You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #32: People should have the same protections regardless of whether they are married or not [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
killbotfactory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-30-09 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #22
32. People should have the same protections regardless of whether they are married or not
I don't think marriage should give people any special benefits or protection. Since it does, it is only fair to extend those benefits and rights to all committed couples.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Must "representative" democracy be the only valid type? Ken Burch  Jun-29-09 10:00 PM   #0 
  - the worst that can happen is freedom? I doubt that.  cali   Jun-29-09 10:07 PM   #1 
  - I wasn't necessarily saying we need to abolish Congress  Ken Burch   Jun-29-09 10:14 PM   #5 
  - the problem is politicians represent those paying their paycheck mostly that means big money  stevebreeze   Jun-29-09 10:08 PM   #2 
  - I think that's the most important thing  cali   Jun-29-09 10:18 PM   #8 
     - We all envy you on that.  Ken Burch   Jun-29-09 10:29 PM   #10 
  - In a country where the upper classes control  hughee99   Jun-29-09 10:12 PM   #3 
  - Then we need to learn to use the new media forms even more to counterract that.  Ken Burch   Jun-29-09 10:18 PM   #7 
     - I agree...  hughee99   Jun-29-09 10:30 PM   #11 
  - More referendums! Yes! Lets ban gays from walking on the sidewalk while we are at it  Oregone   Jun-29-09 10:13 PM   #4 
  - Leaving decisions in the hands of an elite hasn't protected gays.  Ken Burch   Jun-29-09 10:17 PM   #6 
  - Recently it has, much more often then when the people have taken a crack at it.  Oregone   Jun-29-09 10:25 PM   #9 
  - Then I'd agree that it should be wrong to take away someone's individual rights through referenda  Ken Burch   Jun-30-09 11:16 AM   #27 
  - well, that's patently not true in CA- where the elites legalized marriage equality  cali   Jun-29-09 10:36 PM   #12 
     - Hamilton to Jefferson: "Your people, sir, are a vicious beast".  Odin2005   Jun-29-09 11:23 PM   #17 
        - The real problem is that the state is allowed to rule over these matters to begin with.  killbotfactory   Jun-30-09 12:34 AM   #21 
           - "People should be free to enter into any kind of consensual relationship they want"  Oregone   Jun-30-09 08:23 AM   #22 
              - People should have the same protections regardless of whether they are married or not  killbotfactory   Jun-30-09 01:32 PM   #32 
  - Democracy doesn't necessarily mean majority rule.  killbotfactory   Jun-30-09 12:29 AM   #20 
  - The French Revolution got rid of those elites, and...  TreasonousBastard   Jun-29-09 10:47 PM   #13 
  - Well, actually, Cromwell aligned himself with a lot of aristocrats against the king  Ken Burch   Jun-30-09 10:58 AM   #24 
  - Weak institutions such as "community councils" tend to produce autocracy  Hippo_Tron   Jun-29-09 10:58 PM   #14 
  - The community councils in China and Libya are weak because those countries are police states  Ken Burch   Jun-29-09 11:20 PM   #16 
     - Ghaddafi and Mao governed under the premise that the people are represented...  Hippo_Tron   Jun-29-09 11:31 PM   #18 
  - You are making a lot of big assumptions, here.  Odin2005   Jun-29-09 11:20 PM   #15 
  - Would you agree  Ken Burch   Jun-30-09 11:19 AM   #28 
     - I am for PR in the Senate, The House whold stay the same but would use instant runoff.  Odin2005   Jun-30-09 02:31 PM   #38 
        - Well, since each state has only two senators it'd need to be IRV for that  Ken Burch   Jun-30-09 02:35 PM   #39 
           - Good point!  Odin2005   Jun-30-09 02:58 PM   #47 
              - Anyway, I apologize for having referenced it at all.  Ken Burch   Jun-30-09 02:59 PM   #48 
                 - No problem!  Odin2005   Jun-30-09 03:06 PM   #49 
  - There are better solutions, the problem has always been dealing with those already in power  killbotfactory   Jun-30-09 12:25 AM   #19 
  - Representative democracy works far better than direct democracy.  Donald Ian Rankin   Jun-30-09 09:42 AM   #23 
  - With direct democracy, you end up with California  scheming daemons   Jun-30-09 11:10 AM   #25 
  - Well, I was coupling the referenda thing with campaign spending limits  Ken Burch   Jun-30-09 11:15 AM   #26 
     - I'm not sure you're correct about Vietnam  Hippo_Tron   Jun-30-09 11:48 AM   #29 
        - Well, a referenda would've brought to the polls a large group of voters  Ken Burch   Jun-30-09 12:26 PM   #30 
           - Well, the public re-elected him with 60% of the vote in 1972  Hippo_Tron   Jun-30-09 01:57 PM   #34 
           - In 1972, Nixon didn't run as the "keep the war going" candidate  Ken Burch   Jun-30-09 02:14 PM   #35 
              - Not very, because Mao brought his forces into the Taiwan Strait before they could  Hippo_Tron   Jun-30-09 02:24 PM   #36 
                 - So, basically, they put their leashes back on and went straight home.  Ken Burch   Jun-30-09 02:27 PM   #37 
                 - It's kind of like they took the dog out of the cage and then put it on an invisible leash  Hippo_Tron   Jun-30-09 02:42 PM   #41 
                    - The whole first paragraph of that post gives me the image  Ken Burch   Jul-01-09 01:18 AM   #51 
                 - Dulles was a fucking lunatic!  Odin2005   Jun-30-09 02:44 PM   #43 
                    - A lunatic who represented pro-Nazi German corporations as a corporate lawyer.  Ken Burch   Jun-30-09 02:47 PM   #44 
                    - We are still living with the ramifications of the Dulles brothers' foreign policy  Hippo_Tron   Jun-30-09 02:48 PM   #45 
           - Humphrey was in no way on the "extreme right".  Odin2005   Jun-30-09 02:39 PM   #40 
              - The forces that imposed Humphrey were on the party's extreme right  Ken Burch   Jun-30-09 02:44 PM   #42 
                 - You are confusing "Hawk" with "Extreme Right"  Odin2005   Jun-30-09 02:51 PM   #46 
                    - It wasn't just liberal "hawks". It was the Southern delegations  Ken Burch   Jun-30-09 07:41 PM   #50 
  - The Honduran and Venezuelan situations point to the most difficult puzzle of constitutional theory  HamdenRice   Jun-30-09 12:40 PM   #31 
  - America is a representative oligarchy, not a representative democracy.  invictus   Jun-30-09 01:41 PM   #33 
  - Yeah! Or Soviets! ("Workers' Councils") --  smalll   Jul-01-09 02:48 AM   #52 
  - The Soviets didn't CAUSE Stalinism. And a conventional parliament couldn't have stopped it.  Ken Burch   Jul-01-09 08:11 PM   #53 
     - When utopian ideologues win a revolution totalitarianism is inevitable.  Odin2005   Jul-01-09 11:25 PM   #54 
        - The Marxist-Leninists who took over in Russia always presented their ideology as NON-utopian  Ken Burch   Jul-01-09 11:33 PM   #55 
           - Read "The Open Society and It's Enemies" by Karl Popper.  Odin2005   Jul-01-09 11:42 PM   #56 
              - I'm not a Marxist(although I do think Marx had some valid observations)  Ken Burch   Jul-02-09 12:45 AM   #58 
                 - I agree.  Odin2005   Jul-02-09 08:15 AM   #59 
  - "Democracy is the worst form of government except all the others that have been tried."  BlooInBloo   Jul-02-09 12:13 AM   #57 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC