You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #20: I just think that there are a couple of ways you could read your analysis [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
Cant trust em Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-29-09 07:28 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. I just think that there are a couple of ways you could read your analysis
You should probably check out my post upthread.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -White House thinks staying DADT will release pressure on Congress to pass legislation repealing it. Pirate Smile  Jun-29-09 04:30 PM   #0 
  - Heard that.  graywarrior   Jun-29-09 04:31 PM   #1 
  - Not if you are one of the 265 that have been released on his watch. nt  DURHAM D   Jun-29-09 04:35 PM   #3 
     - Yeah. I only hope that the plights of Lt. Choi, Lt. Col. Fehrenbach and others get Congress to act.  backscatter712   Jun-29-09 04:46 PM   #5 
     - No, it still makes sense  mikiturner   Jun-29-09 04:47 PM   #6 
     - How many lives should be sacrificed for the "sense" making? nt  DURHAM D   Jun-29-09 04:53 PM   #7 
     - What is this signature pic? Is that the cabinet? nt  Cant trust em   Jun-29-09 05:33 PM   #15 
     - True.  graywarrior   Jun-29-09 06:06 PM   #17 
  - That observation has often been made on this board.  NYC_SKP   Jun-29-09 04:34 PM   #2 
  - that would make more sense to me coupled with a big push to get it repealed  Cant trust em   Jun-29-09 04:44 PM   #4 
  - LOL. I've been saying that up here the last two months  Thrill   Jun-29-09 04:54 PM   #8 
  - It is the first time I've heard them making it.  Pirate Smile   Jun-29-09 05:09 PM   #10 
  - Me too, I finally gave up  MiniMe   Jun-29-09 06:25 PM   #18 
  - As long as Article 125, as currently reads, is on the book,  sarge43   Jun-29-09 05:06 PM   #9 
  - I'm sort of conflicted with that argument  Hippo_Tron   Jun-29-09 05:13 PM   #11 
  - So either way, if you're a gay service member, you're absolutely screwed  katandmoon   Jun-29-09 05:26 PM   #12 
     - That's an interesting point of view.  Cant trust em   Jun-29-09 05:32 PM   #13 
     - Just keep up the rationalizations for whatever Obama does or doesn't do --  katandmoon   Jun-29-09 06:32 PM   #19 
        - I just think that there are a couple of ways you could read your analysis  Cant trust em   Jun-29-09 07:28 PM   #20 
     - I don't see how it provides cover. Everybody already knows Obama is against DADT.  Pirate Smile   Jun-29-09 05:33 PM   #14 
        - Somehow I doubt those polls are accurate  Cant trust em   Jun-29-09 05:35 PM   #16 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC