You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #43: So this is not the DLC website, and Lieberman is not associated with the DLC? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-21-09 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #20
43. So this is not the DLC website, and Lieberman is not associated with the DLC?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Does the DLC Support Conservative 3rd Parties that Run Against Democrats? Dr Fate  Jun-20-09 11:38 AM   #0 
  - If Lieberman had RUN as a strong supporter of Bush's war decisions, he would have lost big.  blm   Jun-20-09 12:04 PM   #1 
  - Plus the DLC was counting on Republican voters for the majority of the support- and they got it.  Dr Fate   Jun-20-09 12:16 PM   #5 
  - I recall seeing the Clintons go up and campaign for Lieberman, pitiful nt  fadedrose   Jun-20-09 12:07 PM   #2 
  - But they couldnt make it up to CT for the DEM, for whatever reason.  Dr Fate   Jun-20-09 12:14 PM   #4 
  - I recall seeing Obama campaign for Lieberman, pitiful  Beacool   Jun-20-09 11:07 PM   #25 
  - My apologies - I did not know that Obama also campained for Lieberman....nt  fadedrose   Jun-21-09 02:35 PM   #81 
     - That's OK.  Beacool   Jun-21-09 05:45 PM   #88 
  - shit, we had a bunch of longtime DUers campaign for Lieberman  Blue_Tires   Jun-24-09 03:53 PM   #118 
     - And nothing on the DLC website supporting Lamont (D), that is for sure.  Dr Fate   Jun-24-09 03:55 PM   #120 
  - Who needs Republicans?  kenny blankenship   Jun-20-09 12:09 PM   #3 
  - And these are the hypocrites who cuss moan & groan about "Nader" and "The Far Left"  Dr Fate   Jun-20-09 12:17 PM   #6 
  - That is EXACTLY right.  TheKentuckian   Jun-20-09 03:47 PM   #14 
     - NO!  LooseWilly   Jun-20-09 03:52 PM   #16 
  - No one who voted "yes" even read the article. n/t  LoZoccolo   Jun-20-09 12:23 PM   #7 
  - I take it you agree with the DLC's approval of Joe's 3rd party run?  Dr Fate   Jun-20-09 01:42 PM   #9 
  - He's right, you know. And nobody who voted "no" read the article either.  Occam Bandage   Jun-20-09 04:28 PM   #18 
  - The one from yesterday worked fine- but here is a good one:  Dr Fate   Jun-21-09 12:13 PM   #30 
     - No it didn't.  LoZoccolo   Jun-21-09 01:37 PM   # 
        - Is there a particular point made in the DLC article that you would like to focus on? (link provided)  Dr Fate   Jun-21-09 01:42 PM   #68 
  - Deleted message  Name removed   Jun-20-09 10:26 PM   #24 
     - You either agree with the DLC's article, or you dont. Which is it?  Dr Fate   Jun-21-09 12:25 PM   #35 
        - "before it was removed from their site yester day"  LoZoccolo   Jun-21-09 01:20 PM   #54 
           - Working link here- you either agree with the article or you do not.  Dr Fate   Jun-21-09 01:27 PM   #57 
           - In other words, and as Dr. fate has demonstrated repeatedly, he doesn't know how to post links  wyldwolf   Jun-21-09 01:28 PM   #58 
              - At least you proved that the DLC is not associated with Lieberman.  Dr Fate   Jun-21-09 01:29 PM   #59 
                 - Again, where? Link? But you might be interested in this:  wyldwolf   Jun-21-09 01:31 PM   #61 
                    - LOL! It was a joke. You have done nothing to prove that Joe was not a DLC candidate.  Dr Fate   Jun-21-09 01:33 PM   #63 
                       - you call making smears against more than one DUer a "joke?"  wyldwolf   Jun-21-09 01:35 PM   #64 
                       - I thought it was funny. Alert the mods if you think I'm smearing you. n/t  Dr Fate   Jun-21-09 01:36 PM   #65 
                          - you would find it funny.  wyldwolf   Jun-21-09 01:37 PM   #66 
                          - Someone alerted my message up there BAAAAAAAAW! n/t  LoZoccolo   Jun-21-09 01:39 PM   #67 
                       - You mean that the former Chairman of the DLC, Joe Lieberman,...  bvar22   Jun-24-09 03:43 PM   #116 
                          - Al From, DLC FOUNDER helped run Joe's campaign- the very campaign described on the DLC website.  Dr Fate   Jun-24-09 03:50 PM   #117 
  - I thought you cared about Democrats.  Forkboy   Jun-20-09 03:16 PM   #12 
  - Pass it on. n/t  Dr Fate   Jun-21-09 01:30 PM   #60 
  - I do care about the Democrats.  LoZoccolo   Jun-21-09 01:47 PM   #70 
  - I voted yes... and I read the article.  LooseWilly   Jun-20-09 03:49 PM   #15 
     - The link changed for some reason- here is a good one:  Dr Fate   Jun-21-09 12:28 PM   #36 
        - no it didn't. You just posted the wrong link. LOL  wyldwolf   Jun-21-09 12:42 PM   #46 
  - The DLC *IS* a conservative third party that runs against Democrats  Sebastian Doyle   Jun-20-09 12:52 PM   #8 
  - Well, their support & approval of Joe's Conservative 3rd party run speaks for itself. n/t  Dr Fate   Jun-20-09 01:45 PM   #10 
  - It also rather explains why Lieberman still has his seniority in the Senate.  LooseWilly   Jun-20-09 03:42 PM   #13 
     - Could be- it also shows the DLC's very poor long-term judgment.  Dr Fate   Jun-21-09 02:08 PM   #78 
  - Couldn't agree more.  Vidar   Jun-21-09 11:45 AM   #29 
  - I'm glad you had no trouble getting to the DLC's pro-Lieberman article.  Dr Fate   Jun-21-09 02:45 PM   #82 
  - +1  Blue_Tires   Jun-24-09 03:54 PM   #119 
  - LOL! 3 "Judas" votes so far.  Dr Fate   Jun-20-09 02:19 PM   #11 
  - There's another  NoPasaran   Jun-20-09 09:31 PM   #20 
  - So this is not the DLC website, and Lieberman is not associated with the DLC?  Dr Fate   Jun-21-09 12:39 PM   #43 
     - Joseph Lieberman was in /Winning New Hampshire/ with Martin Sheen.  LoZoccolo   Jun-21-09 01:31 PM   #62 
  - LOL!  wyldwolf   Jun-20-09 10:14 PM   #23 
     - I thought you would like that one.  Dr Fate   Jun-21-09 12:37 PM   #42 
        - I did. It's hysterical watching you obsess over this. But here is something real important:  wyldwolf   Jun-21-09 12:45 PM   #49 
  - I would like to read the whole article. Do you have a working link?  Occam Bandage   Jun-20-09 04:26 PM   #17 
  - The link WAS working before, but the article appears to be gone now  Sebastian Doyle   Jun-20-09 09:19 PM   #19 
  - Dr. Fate has a habit of giving links that don't work - but OH NO! It's a DLC plot!!!  wyldwolf   Jun-20-09 10:07 PM   #22 
     - ....  Forkboy   Jun-21-09 12:35 AM   #27 
     - does that mean the nefarious DLC DID NOT remove the link?  wyldwolf   Jun-21-09 10:51 AM   #28 
        - Yes. It also means you were wrong to imply that Dr. fate deliberately posted a bad link.  Forkboy   Jun-21-09 04:59 PM   #87 
           - I didn't imply he deliberately posted a bad link.  wyldwolf   Jun-22-09 08:32 AM   #89 
           - Is there a particular point made in the DLC article that you would like to focus on? (link provided)  Dr Fate   Jun-22-09 10:02 AM   #91 
              - It wasn't me that brought up the bad link.. And as I've already stated - it's an election analysis  wyldwolf   Jun-22-09 11:12 AM   #96 
           - Apparently the link itself is a much safer discussion than the DLC article (link provided).  Dr Fate   Jun-22-09 10:09 AM   #93 
              - you've noticed no one wants to discuss a three year old election analysis with you... but hey!  wyldwolf   Jun-22-09 11:13 AM   #97 
                 - Almost 100 posts- and well over 1000 views- thanks for the kicks!  Dr Fate   Jun-22-09 12:40 PM   #100 
                    - and 48 votes on your poll... LOL! People REALLY do care! LOL  wyldwolf   Jun-22-09 12:52 PM   #104 
     - Here is where you discuss the DLC's web entry with me at length- before it was removed yesterday:  Dr Fate   Jun-21-09 12:21 PM   #34 
        - It wasn't removed. You just don't know how to post a simple link  wyldwolf   Jun-21-09 12:29 PM   #37 
           - Seemed to work fine yesterday, all day long. Here is a good one:  Dr Fate   Jun-21-09 12:30 PM   #39 
              - It still works. You just don't know how to post it  wyldwolf   Jun-21-09 12:40 PM   #45 
                 - Fair enough:  Dr Fate   Jun-21-09 12:42 PM   #47 
                    - see? Just cut and paste. Next we'll teach you have to stay in the lines when coloring:  wyldwolf   Jun-21-09 12:43 PM   #48 
  - Here is the link  Metatron   Jun-20-09 11:32 PM   #26 
  - DLC sez: Resist the Polarizers in our party!!!  Moochy   Jun-21-09 12:20 PM   #33 
     - So you were able to link to & see the article- good.  Dr Fate   Jun-21-09 12:31 PM   #40 
  - The link worked yesterday- I saved several paragraphs from it  Dr Fate   Jun-21-09 12:19 PM   #32 
  - LOL! This is Dr.Fate's THIRD attempt in 2 days to stir shit with a three year old election analysis  wyldwolf   Jun-20-09 10:03 PM   #21 
  - Imagine that- me linking the DLC to their own member, and their own website.  Dr Fate   Jun-21-09 12:15 PM   #31 
     - about a dozen times in three different threads. LOL! Obsessive!  wyldwolf   Jun-21-09 12:29 PM   #38 
        - At least you proved that the DLC is not associated with Lieberman.  Dr Fate   Jun-21-09 12:34 PM   #41 
           - where? Link? Is that how you discuss things? By making things up?? LOL  wyldwolf   Jun-21-09 12:39 PM   #44 
  - WORKING LINK HERE:  Dr Fate   Jun-21-09 12:53 PM   #50 
  - Everybody! A round of applause! Fate learned to post a link correctly!  wyldwolf   Jun-21-09 12:54 PM   #51 
     - You seem to agree with DLC's position on Lieberman-as stated on their website-in any event. n/t  Dr Fate   Jun-21-09 12:57 PM   #52 
        - I agree the "progressive" attempt at purging the party is a lousy thing  wyldwolf   Jun-21-09 12:58 PM   #53 
           - So you & the DLC side with Lieberman (I -3rd Party)- we already knew that.  Dr Fate   Jun-21-09 01:23 PM   #55 
              - ha ha. Amazing - but fine example of how "progressives" smear people. But look here:  wyldwolf   Jun-21-09 01:26 PM   #56 
                 - LOL! So I'm "smearing" DLCers by linking their own DLC website to their own member, Joe Lieberman?  Dr Fate   Jun-21-09 01:46 PM   #69 
                    - no, you're smearing DUers by claiming they've said things they haven't. And I've asked for links.  wyldwolf   Jun-21-09 01:47 PM   #71 
                       - LOL! At least you proved that the DLC is not associated with Lieberman's run.  Dr Fate   Jun-21-09 01:53 PM   #74 
                          - Link? But you forgot this:  wyldwolf   Jun-21-09 01:57 PM   #75 
  - Their support of Lieberman speaks for itself.  AtomicKitten   Jun-21-09 01:52 PM   #72 
  - I also believe that the DLC's own website gives an accurate presentation of DLC views on Lieberman.  Dr Fate   Jun-21-09 01:58 PM   #76 
     - &*$%# Lieberman was McCain's wingman FFS!!!!  AtomicKitten   Jun-21-09 02:17 PM   #79 
        - My guess is that the DLC will continue to support Lieberman, as they always have. (Link provided)  Dr Fate   Jun-21-09 02:21 PM   #80 
  - I didn't bother to do the poll  newspeak   Jun-21-09 01:53 PM   #73 
  - Lieberman was a DLC candidate, and he often agreed with Bush on major issues- so you have a point.  Dr Fate   Jun-21-09 02:00 PM   #77 
  - I blame Nader for Lieberman's Independent Senate Run!  Moochy   Jun-21-09 02:58 PM   #83 
  - Sure- and then Nader forced the DLC to brag about the DEM defeat on their website (link provided)  Dr Fate   Jun-21-09 03:05 PM   #84 
     - And ultimately cant all of du agree on the simple fact  Moochy   Jun-21-09 03:29 PM   #85 
        - Sure- and it was "Nader" who forced DLCers to kiss George Bush's ass for 8 years too.  Dr Fate   Jun-21-09 03:37 PM   #86 
  - In Connecticut it was the Repubs and some conservative Dems that voted Loserman back in  Jennicut   Jun-22-09 08:46 AM   #90 
  - It's true- the DLC counted on the Republicans to push through their 3rd Party run.  Dr Fate   Jun-22-09 10:05 AM   #92 
     - No one payed attention to the Repub here in CT so Loserman was the default Repub  Jennicut   Jun-22-09 10:35 AM   #94 
        - And then the great DLC hero, Joe Lieberman, went on to campaign for SARAH PALIN (R).  Dr Fate   Jun-22-09 10:44 AM   #95 
  - What speficilly did the DLC do to help Lieberman after he lost the primary?  Freddie Stubbs   Jun-22-09 11:53 AM   #98 
  - Al From, FOUNDER of the DLC, helped run his campaign. The DLC's own website approves of the run..  Dr Fate   Jun-22-09 12:38 PM   #99 
  - uu huh  wyldwolf   Jun-22-09 12:51 PM   #103 
  - And Yet Al From's "personal remarks" are 100% in line with what we find at the DLC's own website.  Dr Fate   Jun-22-09 12:56 PM   #107 
     - which is an election analysis! Go figure! LOL!  wyldwolf   Jun-22-09 01:07 PM   #111 
        - A DLC "election analysis" that supports & approves of Joe's 3rd Party run (link provided)  Dr Fate   Jun-22-09 01:08 PM   #112 
           - that explains how the election was won and lost  wyldwolf   Jun-22-09 01:22 PM   #114 
              - That's right- the DLC article brags about how the DLC candidate defeated the legit DEM nominee.  Dr Fate   Jun-24-09 01:51 PM   #115 
  - Oops! Looks like at least one blue dog is totally uninformed.  Kingofalldems   Jun-22-09 12:55 PM   #106 
     - Pass it on. n/t  Dr Fate   Jun-22-09 01:05 PM   #109 
  - Aren't you a big Lieberman fan?  Kingofalldems   Jun-22-09 12:57 PM   #108 
  - You do know the Blue Dogs vote against Dem interests more often than DLCers, right?  redqueen   Jun-22-09 12:42 PM   #101 
     - Then feel free to post something about them-This is about how they support conservative 3rd Parties.  Dr Fate   Jun-22-09 12:50 PM   #102 
        - I didn't either, till I saw the research.  redqueen   Jun-22-09 12:52 PM   #105 
           - if it can actually be agreed on what voting the Democratic party line means...  wyldwolf   Jun-22-09 01:06 PM   #110 
           - A lot of over lap as well.  Dr Fate   Jun-22-09 01:12 PM   #113 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC