Dr Fate
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jun-21-09 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #20 |
| 43. So this is not the DLC website, and Lieberman is not associated with the DLC? |
| -Does the DLC Support Conservative 3rd Parties that Run Against Democrats? |
Dr Fate |
Jun-20-09 11:38 AM |
#0 |
-
If Lieberman had RUN as a strong supporter of Bush's war decisions, he would have lost big. |
blm |
Jun-20-09 12:04 PM |
#1 |
 -
Plus the DLC was counting on Republican voters for the majority of the support- and they got it. |
Dr Fate |
Jun-20-09 12:16 PM |
#5 |
-
I recall seeing the Clintons go up and campaign for Lieberman, pitiful nt |
fadedrose |
Jun-20-09 12:07 PM |
#2 |
 -
But they couldnt make it up to CT for the DEM, for whatever reason. |
Dr Fate |
Jun-20-09 12:14 PM |
#4 |
 -
I recall seeing Obama campaign for Lieberman, pitiful |
Beacool |
Jun-20-09 11:07 PM |
#25 |
  -
My apologies - I did not know that Obama also campained for Lieberman....nt |
fadedrose |
Jun-21-09 02:35 PM |
#81 |
 -
That's OK. |
Beacool |
Jun-21-09 05:45 PM |
#88 |
 -
shit, we had a bunch of longtime DUers campaign for Lieberman |
Blue_Tires |
Jun-24-09 03:53 PM |
#118 |
-
And nothing on the DLC website supporting Lamont (D), that is for sure. |
Dr Fate |
Jun-24-09 03:55 PM |
#120 |
-
Who needs Republicans? |
kenny blankenship |
Jun-20-09 12:09 PM |
#3 |
 -
And these are the hypocrites who cuss moan & groan about "Nader" and "The Far Left" |
Dr Fate |
Jun-20-09 12:17 PM |
#6 |
 -
That is EXACTLY right. |
TheKentuckian |
Jun-20-09 03:47 PM |
#14 |
-
NO! |
LooseWilly |
Jun-20-09 03:52 PM |
#16 |
-
No one who voted "yes" even read the article. n/t |
LoZoccolo |
Jun-20-09 12:23 PM |
#7 |
 -
I take it you agree with the DLC's approval of Joe's 3rd party run? |
Dr Fate |
Jun-20-09 01:42 PM |
#9 |
  -
He's right, you know. And nobody who voted "no" read the article either. |
Occam Bandage |
Jun-20-09 04:28 PM |
#18 |
   -
The one from yesterday worked fine- but here is a good one: |
Dr Fate |
Jun-21-09 12:13 PM |
#30 |
  -
No it didn't. |
LoZoccolo |
Jun-21-09 01:37 PM |
# |
  -
Is there a particular point made in the DLC article that you would like to focus on? (link provided) |
Dr Fate |
Jun-21-09 01:42 PM |
#68 |
  -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Jun-20-09 10:26 PM |
#24 |
 -
You either agree with the DLC's article, or you dont. Which is it? |
Dr Fate |
Jun-21-09 12:25 PM |
#35 |
 -
"before it was removed from their site yester day" |
LoZoccolo |
Jun-21-09 01:20 PM |
#54 |
 -
Working link here- you either agree with the article or you do not. |
Dr Fate |
Jun-21-09 01:27 PM |
#57 |
 -
In other words, and as Dr. fate has demonstrated repeatedly, he doesn't know how to post links |
wyldwolf |
Jun-21-09 01:28 PM |
#58 |
 -
At least you proved that the DLC is not associated with Lieberman. |
Dr Fate |
Jun-21-09 01:29 PM |
#59 |
 -
Again, where? Link? But you might be interested in this: |
wyldwolf |
Jun-21-09 01:31 PM |
#61 |
 -
LOL! It was a joke. You have done nothing to prove that Joe was not a DLC candidate. |
Dr Fate |
Jun-21-09 01:33 PM |
#63 |
 -
you call making smears against more than one DUer a "joke?" |
wyldwolf |
Jun-21-09 01:35 PM |
#64 |
  -
I thought it was funny. Alert the mods if you think I'm smearing you. n/t |
Dr Fate |
Jun-21-09 01:36 PM |
#65 |
 -
you would find it funny. |
wyldwolf |
Jun-21-09 01:37 PM |
#66 |
 -
Someone alerted my message up there BAAAAAAAAW! n/t |
LoZoccolo |
Jun-21-09 01:39 PM |
#67 |
 -
You mean that the former Chairman of the DLC, Joe Lieberman,... |
bvar22 |
Jun-24-09 03:43 PM |
#116 |
 -
Al From, DLC FOUNDER helped run Joe's campaign- the very campaign described on the DLC website. |
Dr Fate |
Jun-24-09 03:50 PM |
#117 |
 -
I thought you cared about Democrats. |
Forkboy |
Jun-20-09 03:16 PM |
#12 |
  -
Pass it on. n/t |
Dr Fate |
Jun-21-09 01:30 PM |
#60 |
  -
I do care about the Democrats. |
LoZoccolo |
Jun-21-09 01:47 PM |
#70 |
 -
I voted yes... and I read the article. |
LooseWilly |
Jun-20-09 03:49 PM |
#15 |
-
The link changed for some reason- here is a good one: |
Dr Fate |
Jun-21-09 12:28 PM |
#36 |
-
no it didn't. You just posted the wrong link. LOL |
wyldwolf |
Jun-21-09 12:42 PM |
#46 |
-
The DLC *IS* a conservative third party that runs against Democrats |
Sebastian Doyle |
Jun-20-09 12:52 PM |
#8 |
 -
Well, their support & approval of Joe's Conservative 3rd party run speaks for itself. n/t |
Dr Fate |
Jun-20-09 01:45 PM |
#10 |
  -
It also rather explains why Lieberman still has his seniority in the Senate. |
LooseWilly |
Jun-20-09 03:42 PM |
#13 |
 -
Could be- it also shows the DLC's very poor long-term judgment. |
Dr Fate |
Jun-21-09 02:08 PM |
#78 |
 -
Couldn't agree more. |
Vidar |
Jun-21-09 11:45 AM |
#29 |
  -
I'm glad you had no trouble getting to the DLC's pro-Lieberman article. |
Dr Fate |
Jun-21-09 02:45 PM |
#82 |
 -
+1 |
Blue_Tires |
Jun-24-09 03:54 PM |
#119 |
-
LOL! 3 "Judas" votes so far. |
Dr Fate |
Jun-20-09 02:19 PM |
#11 |
 -
There's another |
NoPasaran |
Jun-20-09 09:31 PM |
#20 |
  -
So this is not the DLC website, and Lieberman is not associated with the DLC? |
Dr Fate |
Jun-21-09 12:39 PM |
#43 |
 -
Joseph Lieberman was in /Winning New Hampshire/ with Martin Sheen. |
LoZoccolo |
Jun-21-09 01:31 PM |
#62 |
 -
LOL! |
wyldwolf |
Jun-20-09 10:14 PM |
#23 |
-
I thought you would like that one. |
Dr Fate |
Jun-21-09 12:37 PM |
#42 |
-
I did. It's hysterical watching you obsess over this. But here is something real important: |
wyldwolf |
Jun-21-09 12:45 PM |
#49 |
-
I would like to read the whole article. Do you have a working link? |
Occam Bandage |
Jun-20-09 04:26 PM |
#17 |
 -
The link WAS working before, but the article appears to be gone now |
Sebastian Doyle |
Jun-20-09 09:19 PM |
#19 |
  -
Dr. Fate has a habit of giving links that don't work - but OH NO! It's a DLC plot!!! |
wyldwolf |
Jun-20-09 10:07 PM |
#22 |
 -
.... |
Forkboy |
Jun-21-09 12:35 AM |
#27 |
  -
does that mean the nefarious DLC DID NOT remove the link? |
wyldwolf |
Jun-21-09 10:51 AM |
#28 |
 -
Yes. It also means you were wrong to imply that Dr. fate deliberately posted a bad link. |
Forkboy |
Jun-21-09 04:59 PM |
#87 |
 -
I didn't imply he deliberately posted a bad link. |
wyldwolf |
Jun-22-09 08:32 AM |
#89 |
  -
Is there a particular point made in the DLC article that you would like to focus on? (link provided) |
Dr Fate |
Jun-22-09 10:02 AM |
#91 |
 -
It wasn't me that brought up the bad link.. And as I've already stated - it's an election analysis |
wyldwolf |
Jun-22-09 11:12 AM |
#96 |
 -
Apparently the link itself is a much safer discussion than the DLC article (link provided). |
Dr Fate |
Jun-22-09 10:09 AM |
#93 |
 -
you've noticed no one wants to discuss a three year old election analysis with you... but hey! |
wyldwolf |
Jun-22-09 11:13 AM |
#97 |
 -
Almost 100 posts- and well over 1000 views- thanks for the kicks! |
Dr Fate |
Jun-22-09 12:40 PM |
#100 |
 -
and 48 votes on your poll... LOL! People REALLY do care! LOL |
wyldwolf |
Jun-22-09 12:52 PM |
#104 |
 -
Here is where you discuss the DLC's web entry with me at length- before it was removed yesterday: |
Dr Fate |
Jun-21-09 12:21 PM |
#34 |
 -
It wasn't removed. You just don't know how to post a simple link |
wyldwolf |
Jun-21-09 12:29 PM |
#37 |
 -
Seemed to work fine yesterday, all day long. Here is a good one: |
Dr Fate |
Jun-21-09 12:30 PM |
#39 |
 -
It still works. You just don't know how to post it |
wyldwolf |
Jun-21-09 12:40 PM |
#45 |
 -
Fair enough: |
Dr Fate |
Jun-21-09 12:42 PM |
#47 |
 -
see? Just cut and paste. Next we'll teach you have to stay in the lines when coloring: |
wyldwolf |
Jun-21-09 12:43 PM |
#48 |
 -
Here is the link |
Metatron |
Jun-20-09 11:32 PM |
#26 |
  -
DLC sez: Resist the Polarizers in our party!!! |
Moochy |
Jun-21-09 12:20 PM |
#33 |
 -
So you were able to link to & see the article- good. |
Dr Fate |
Jun-21-09 12:31 PM |
#40 |
 -
The link worked yesterday- I saved several paragraphs from it |
Dr Fate |
Jun-21-09 12:19 PM |
#32 |
-
LOL! This is Dr.Fate's THIRD attempt in 2 days to stir shit with a three year old election analysis |
wyldwolf |
Jun-20-09 10:03 PM |
#21 |
 -
Imagine that- me linking the DLC to their own member, and their own website. |
Dr Fate |
Jun-21-09 12:15 PM |
#31 |
-
about a dozen times in three different threads. LOL! Obsessive! |
wyldwolf |
Jun-21-09 12:29 PM |
#38 |
-
At least you proved that the DLC is not associated with Lieberman. |
Dr Fate |
Jun-21-09 12:34 PM |
#41 |
-
where? Link? Is that how you discuss things? By making things up?? LOL |
wyldwolf |
Jun-21-09 12:39 PM |
#44 |
-
WORKING LINK HERE: |
Dr Fate |
Jun-21-09 12:53 PM |
#50 |
 -
Everybody! A round of applause! Fate learned to post a link correctly! |
wyldwolf |
Jun-21-09 12:54 PM |
#51 |
-
You seem to agree with DLC's position on Lieberman-as stated on their website-in any event. n/t |
Dr Fate |
Jun-21-09 12:57 PM |
#52 |
-
I agree the "progressive" attempt at purging the party is a lousy thing |
wyldwolf |
Jun-21-09 12:58 PM |
#53 |
-
So you & the DLC side with Lieberman (I -3rd Party)- we already knew that. |
Dr Fate |
Jun-21-09 01:23 PM |
#55 |
-
ha ha. Amazing - but fine example of how "progressives" smear people. But look here: |
wyldwolf |
Jun-21-09 01:26 PM |
#56 |
-
LOL! So I'm "smearing" DLCers by linking their own DLC website to their own member, Joe Lieberman? |
Dr Fate |
Jun-21-09 01:46 PM |
#69 |
-
no, you're smearing DUers by claiming they've said things they haven't. And I've asked for links. |
wyldwolf |
Jun-21-09 01:47 PM |
#71 |
-
LOL! At least you proved that the DLC is not associated with Lieberman's run. |
Dr Fate |
Jun-21-09 01:53 PM |
#74 |
-
Link? But you forgot this: |
wyldwolf |
Jun-21-09 01:57 PM |
#75 |
-
Their support of Lieberman speaks for itself. |
AtomicKitten |
Jun-21-09 01:52 PM |
#72 |
 -
I also believe that the DLC's own website gives an accurate presentation of DLC views on Lieberman. |
Dr Fate |
Jun-21-09 01:58 PM |
#76 |
-
&*$%# Lieberman was McCain's wingman FFS!!!! |
AtomicKitten |
Jun-21-09 02:17 PM |
#79 |
-
My guess is that the DLC will continue to support Lieberman, as they always have. (Link provided) |
Dr Fate |
Jun-21-09 02:21 PM |
#80 |
-
I didn't bother to do the poll |
newspeak |
Jun-21-09 01:53 PM |
#73 |
 -
Lieberman was a DLC candidate, and he often agreed with Bush on major issues- so you have a point. |
Dr Fate |
Jun-21-09 02:00 PM |
#77 |
-
I blame Nader for Lieberman's Independent Senate Run! |
Moochy |
Jun-21-09 02:58 PM |
#83 |
 -
Sure- and then Nader forced the DLC to brag about the DEM defeat on their website (link provided) |
Dr Fate |
Jun-21-09 03:05 PM |
#84 |
-
And ultimately cant all of du agree on the simple fact |
Moochy |
Jun-21-09 03:29 PM |
#85 |
-
Sure- and it was "Nader" who forced DLCers to kiss George Bush's ass for 8 years too. |
Dr Fate |
Jun-21-09 03:37 PM |
#86 |
-
In Connecticut it was the Repubs and some conservative Dems that voted Loserman back in |
Jennicut |
Jun-22-09 08:46 AM |
#90 |
 -
It's true- the DLC counted on the Republicans to push through their 3rd Party run. |
Dr Fate |
Jun-22-09 10:05 AM |
#92 |
-
No one payed attention to the Repub here in CT so Loserman was the default Repub |
Jennicut |
Jun-22-09 10:35 AM |
#94 |
-
And then the great DLC hero, Joe Lieberman, went on to campaign for SARAH PALIN (R). |
Dr Fate |
Jun-22-09 10:44 AM |
#95 |
-
What speficilly did the DLC do to help Lieberman after he lost the primary? |
Freddie Stubbs |
Jun-22-09 11:53 AM |
#98 |
 -
Al From, FOUNDER of the DLC, helped run his campaign. The DLC's own website approves of the run.. |
Dr Fate |
Jun-22-09 12:38 PM |
#99 |
  -
uu huh |
wyldwolf |
Jun-22-09 12:51 PM |
#103 |
   -
And Yet Al From's "personal remarks" are 100% in line with what we find at the DLC's own website. |
Dr Fate |
Jun-22-09 12:56 PM |
#107 |
  -
which is an election analysis! Go figure! LOL! |
wyldwolf |
Jun-22-09 01:07 PM |
#111 |
  -
A DLC "election analysis" that supports & approves of Joe's 3rd Party run (link provided) |
Dr Fate |
Jun-22-09 01:08 PM |
#112 |
  -
that explains how the election was won and lost |
wyldwolf |
Jun-22-09 01:22 PM |
#114 |
  -
That's right- the DLC article brags about how the DLC candidate defeated the legit DEM nominee. |
Dr Fate |
Jun-24-09 01:51 PM |
#115 |
  -
Oops! Looks like at least one blue dog is totally uninformed. |
Kingofalldems |
Jun-22-09 12:55 PM |
#106 |
 -
Pass it on. n/t |
Dr Fate |
Jun-22-09 01:05 PM |
#109 |
 -
Aren't you a big Lieberman fan? |
Kingofalldems |
Jun-22-09 12:57 PM |
#108 |
-
You do know the Blue Dogs vote against Dem interests more often than DLCers, right? |
redqueen |
Jun-22-09 12:42 PM |
#101 |
-
Then feel free to post something about them-This is about how they support conservative 3rd Parties. |
Dr Fate |
Jun-22-09 12:50 PM |
#102 |
-
I didn't either, till I saw the research. |
redqueen |
Jun-22-09 12:52 PM |
#105 |
-
if it can actually be agreed on what voting the Democratic party line means... |
wyldwolf |
Jun-22-09 01:06 PM |
#110 |
-
A lot of over lap as well. |
Dr Fate |
Jun-22-09 01:12 PM |
#113 |