annabanana
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jun-20-09 08:29 AM
Response to Original message |
| 31. Yes. It would fail at it's two most important missions: |
|
Make healthcare available to all citizens and Lower the cost of healthcare
|
| -Should Obama veto a Health Care bill without a viable public option, |
denem |
Jun-19-09 03:52 PM |
#0 |
-
Yes. |
avaistheone1 |
Jun-19-09 03:59 PM |
#1 |
-
In my opinion, it wouldn't be a "reform" bill without one, |
rockymountaindem |
Jun-19-09 03:59 PM |
#2 |
-
Yes, because the 76% of us who want one that is workable and cost |
Cleita |
Jun-19-09 04:02 PM |
#3 |
-
Yes. A bad bill is worse than no bill at all. nt |
johnaries |
Jun-19-09 04:03 PM |
#4 |
-
Yes, veto it with contempt. n/t |
Uncle Joe |
Jun-19-09 04:03 PM |
#5 |
 -
Best answer. |
avaistheone1 |
Jun-19-09 04:04 PM |
#6 |
-
He will sign whatever. |
kenny blankenship |
Jun-19-09 04:06 PM |
#7 |
 -
How do you figure? |
quakerboy |
Jun-20-09 02:36 AM |
#23 |
-
Depends. Even without it, there are some things that could be improved. |
denverbill |
Jun-19-09 04:29 PM |
#8 |
 -
Even with a mandate? |
quakerboy |
Jun-20-09 02:34 AM |
#22 |
-
No, the idea of a mandate completely sucks. |
denverbill |
Jun-20-09 08:24 AM |
#30 |
-
What I am still stuck on |
quakerboy |
Jun-20-09 01:40 PM |
#40 |
-
yes |
DJ13 |
Jun-19-09 04:33 PM |
#9 |
-
Yes, but only if they cap costs and premiums |
andym |
Jun-19-09 04:38 PM |
#10 |
 -
Actually I meant "NO", but only if the bill includes a cap on costs and premiums |
andym |
Jun-19-09 06:46 PM |
#18 |
-
YES!!! |
Independent_Voice |
Jun-19-09 05:06 PM |
#11 |
-
Absolutely!!! |
OHdem10 |
Jun-19-09 05:08 PM |
#12 |
-
Yes. nt |
Occam Bandage |
Jun-19-09 05:08 PM |
#13 |
-
A bill without one should never make it to his desk |
Thrill |
Jun-19-09 05:41 PM |
#14 |
 -
But when Baucus brings it there anyway, |
quakerboy |
Jun-20-09 02:32 AM |
#21 |
-
Yes, otherwise what's the point of this whole legislative exercise? |
CTyankee |
Jun-19-09 05:50 PM |
#15 |
-
The Progressives in the House are not going to back a bill without |
MasonJar |
Jun-19-09 06:24 PM |
#16 |
 -
"...the political environment is somewhat different than the last time..." |
masuki bance |
Jun-20-09 04:02 AM |
#25 |
-
Yes. Once it's law, we'll never get another chance. n/t |
Phx_Dem |
Jun-19-09 06:41 PM |
#17 |
 -
YES! What you wrote is probably true. |
Better Believe It |
Jun-19-09 10:07 PM |
#19 |
-
Hell Yes |
quakerboy |
Jun-20-09 02:31 AM |
#20 |
-
he won't if the corporate PTB don't want him to |
ima_sinnic |
Jun-20-09 03:49 AM |
#24 |
-
He had better |
Zodiak |
Jun-20-09 06:15 AM |
#26 |
-
Yes.....but I think he'll sign whatever is presented. n/t |
grillo7 |
Jun-20-09 06:18 AM |
#27 |
 -
and they will have a signing ceremony can call it the BIGGEST |
sisters6 |
Jun-20-09 06:34 AM |
#28 |
-
so sad....and so true n/t |
grillo7 |
Jun-20-09 07:09 AM |
#29 |
-
Yes. It would fail at it's two most important missions: |
annabanana |
Jun-20-09 08:29 AM |
#31 |
-
Absolutely. |
crazylikafox |
Jun-20-09 08:34 AM |
#32 |
-
Yes |
ebbie15644 |
Jun-20-09 09:20 AM |
#33 |
-
Yes. He's said that he only supports a plan with a strong public option that meets his criteria. |
vaberella |
Jun-20-09 09:54 AM |
#34 |
 -
Yes. 1/2 & 1/2 still just a beginning for industry to reform. Just like regulatory framework. We |
MarjorieG |
Jun-20-09 01:47 PM |
#42 |
-
I think he probably should |
Proud Liberal Dem |
Jun-20-09 09:55 AM |
#35 |
-
Yes, but he won't. |
Vidar |
Jun-20-09 11:18 AM |
#36 |
-
Absofuckinlutely he should. |
kath |
Jun-20-09 12:16 PM |
#37 |
 -
;-) |
sisters6 |
Jun-20-09 12:59 PM |
#38 |
-
Hell yes |
Bluenorthwest |
Jun-20-09 01:11 PM |
#39 |
-
No. |
quiller4 |
Jun-20-09 01:47 PM |
#41 |
-
Yes |
AlexanderProgressive |
Jun-20-09 01:52 PM |
#43 |
-
It depends |
karynnj |
Jun-20-09 02:10 PM |
#44 |
-
I can't see a scenario where I think health care would be improved enough |
mvd |
Jun-20-09 02:34 PM |
#45 |