You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #15: Yes, but they are small in number....the "rift" is bogus. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
PassingFair Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-19-09 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. Yes, but they are small in number....the "rift" is bogus.
Anyone who has seriously looked into
the Public Option plan knows that it
will be the only way we can ease into
National Health.

The "SinglePayer Only" peeps must know
that it is politically impossible to
overhaul the system when the insurance
companies wield so much power.

The bogus "rift" will somehow be used
to spin why we can't have any reform
at all.

Personally, I want a crack at the same
Medicare program that my Senator has.

So will everyone else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC