You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #22: Oh my resorting to the usual insults instead of answering the real [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
solstice Donating Member (278 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-05-09 06:23 PM
Response to Reply #17
22. Oh my resorting to the usual insults instead of answering the real
question.

Figures.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Sen. Kit Bond: "Mudd's ties to the program would be investigated during the confirmation hearing." ProSense  Jun-05-09 05:04 PM   #0 
  - No comment? n/t  ProSense   Jun-05-09 05:37 PM   #1 
  - I EXPECT hypocrisy from Repug congressmen. I DON'T expect Obama to nominate as an intelligent chief  katandmoon   Jun-05-09 05:42 PM   #2 
  - Fascinating, so who do you want investigated:  ProSense   Jun-05-09 05:47 PM   #3 
  - Fascinating. And how do you feel about this nomination of Obama's?  katandmoon   Jun-05-09 06:01 PM   #4 
     - Funny how the "choir" are attacking you instead of answering the question  solstice   Jun-05-09 06:13 PM   #12 
     - Choir? "That's the issue. Not the repug hypocrisy. "  ProSense   Jun-05-09 06:21 PM   #20 
     - Why did Obama nominate somebody involved in the torture program?  solstice   Jun-05-09 06:24 PM   #23 
        - Link, quote, source, proof? That excludes unsourced hearsay and rumor, BTW.  ClarkUSA   Jun-05-09 06:27 PM   #27 
        - No, I haven't spoken to Obama, and  ProSense   Jun-05-09 06:28 PM   #28 
     - It's a question based on a presumption of guilt, which you two are all to eager to push.  ClarkUSA   Jun-05-09 06:25 PM   #25 
     - That should be obvious from the OP  ProSense   Jun-05-09 06:20 PM   #18 
  - Spare us your melodrama. We all know you expect the worst of Pres. Obama in all things.  ClarkUSA   Jun-05-09 06:06 PM   #7 
     - It's not melodrama. It's a valid question that deserves an answer. Why did Obama nominate someone  katandmoon   Jun-05-09 06:09 PM   #9 
        - Your emotionally biased question is based on a presumption based on zero proof.  ClarkUSA   Jun-05-09 06:12 PM   #11 
           - That's OK. The Bush Administration had no comment, either.  katandmoon   Jun-05-09 06:17 PM   #15 
              - No comment on what?  ClarkUSA   Jun-05-09 06:21 PM   #19 
  - Mudd dropped out over this. Republicans are so disappointed.  ClarkUSA   Jun-05-09 06:01 PM   #5 
     - His dropping out strongly indicates his record will not stand up to hypocritcal Repug investigation  katandmoon   Jun-05-09 06:04 PM   #6 
     - Or it indicates he doesn't want to be a long MSM distraction with Sotomayor waiting in the wings.  ClarkUSA   Jun-05-09 06:08 PM   #8 
        - Then why does he avoid saying his record is clean? And why does the White House  katandmoon   Jun-05-09 06:10 PM   #10 
           - Um, why should he or the WH say anything because of a trumped-up GOP witchhunt?  ClarkUSA   Jun-05-09 06:16 PM   #13 
              - Doesn't say much for Obama if he lets the repugs treat his nominees that way without a peep  solstice   Jun-05-09 06:18 PM   #16 
              - How so? It was Mudd's call, unless you have proof otherwise. Which I doubt.  ClarkUSA   Jun-05-09 06:23 PM   #21 
              - If I were Mudd, and had no tires to torture, I'd appreciate a defense against the GOP witchhunt.  katandmoon   Jun-05-09 06:28 PM   #30 
                 - If I were Mudd, I wouldn't allow myself to be used as a GOP weapon against Pres. Obama.  ClarkUSA   Jun-05-09 06:31 PM   #32 
     - But why did Obama nominate him? That's the question - which you obviously cannot answer.  solstice   Jun-05-09 06:16 PM   #14 
        - Because he's qualified. Do you have proof otherwise or are you doing what you usually do?  ClarkUSA   Jun-05-09 06:20 PM   #17 
           - Oh my resorting to the usual insults instead of answering the real  solstice   Jun-05-09 06:23 PM   #22 
           - Didn't you just throw out the "choir" label? n/t  ProSense   Jun-05-09 06:25 PM   #24 
           - I'm asking for proof of your presumption of guilt on Mudd's part. You don't have any, I'll bet.  ClarkUSA   Jun-05-09 06:28 PM   #29 
           - 'Cause it's  Cha   Jun-05-09 06:26 PM   #26 
              - Way overdue, imo.  ClarkUSA   Jun-05-09 06:29 PM   #31 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC