You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #10: The story goes that they were already there [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
frog92969 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-03-09 12:15 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. The story goes that they were already there
but hadn't been counted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -250,000 Military Contractors Now Deployed in Iraq/Afghanistan: 23% Iraq & 29% Afghanistan Increase Better Believe It  Jun-02-09 09:29 PM   #0 
  - I suppose you could consider paying civilians to fight as ending the war, kind of.  rug   Jun-02-09 09:34 PM   #1 
  - But you have to pay them a lot more money than grunts  Better Believe It   Jun-02-09 09:36 PM   #2 
  - Money, shmoney. The war is over. Hooray.  rug   Jun-02-09 09:43 PM   #5 
  - Well, let the Iraqi gov't pay to keep them there.  Dark   Jun-03-09 01:45 PM   #27 
  - with Obama, "there has been a 23% increase in the number of Private Security Contractors”  Just-plain-Kathy   Jun-02-09 09:38 PM   #3 
  - The increase has been debunked as an accounting error  frog92969   Jun-02-09 09:42 PM   #4 
  - It's a war begun on a lie, continued with bogus soldiers.  rug   Jun-02-09 09:44 PM   #6 
  - No doubt  frog92969   Jun-02-09 09:52 PM   #7 
  - On account of what?  Better Believe It   Jun-02-09 10:38 PM   #9 
     - The story goes that they were already there  frog92969   Jun-03-09 12:15 AM   #10 
        - Link?  Luminous Animal   Jun-03-09 12:30 AM   #11 
           - Link  frog92969   Jun-03-09 12:42 AM   #12 
  - time to privatize all these contractors - private enterprise and all that nt  msongs   Jun-02-09 10:20 PM   #8 
  - Private mercenary armies! Way to go!  Better Believe It   Jun-03-09 08:46 AM   #13 
  - Not "military contractors"  nichomachus   Jun-03-09 09:14 AM   #14 
  - That increase is YoY, not since Obama took office, so the charge is a lie.  redqueen   Jun-03-09 09:18 AM   #15 
  - +1  ClarkUSA   Jun-03-09 09:30 AM   #17 
  - Where are you getting the YoY numbers?  chill_wind   Jun-03-09 10:44 AM   #18 
     - You're right. I misread it.  redqueen   Jun-03-09 10:48 AM   #19 
     - So we would rather trash Jeremy Scahill wholesale as a LIAR  chill_wind   Jun-03-09 11:21 AM   #21 
     - 3,184 to 4,111... and not due to any of Obama's policy changes.  redqueen   Jun-03-09 11:24 AM   #22 
     - You insistently repeated that misinfo in 3 separate theads now, and added a new strawman on top.  chill_wind   Jun-03-09 12:16 PM   #24 
        - That's how people overreacting to this misleading story are acting.  redqueen   Jun-03-09 12:33 PM   #25 
           - "as if these are all armed thugs". wow you seriously need to  jonnyblitz   Jun-03-09 02:06 PM   #28 
     - It is correct that there was an increase in the first quarter, the following is not correct  grantcart   Jun-03-09 11:00 AM   #20 
  - And the other 732 mercenary contractor companies are located where?  earcandle   Jun-03-09 09:21 AM   #16 
  - Please adjust your post with context. The Obama admin. didn't increase the number of contracts.  phleshdef   Jun-03-09 11:53 AM   #23 
  - 2,042 more in Iraq; 927 more in Afghanistan  ieoeja   Jun-03-09 01:08 PM   #26 
  - It sounds inevitable, as troops draw down.  chill_wind   Jun-03-09 03:37 PM   #29 
  - And as for the State Department's numbers? Good luck  chill_wind   Jun-03-09 06:38 PM   #30 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC