leftstreet
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-02-09 12:41 AM
Response to Original message |
| 16. What an Orwellian name - 'protecting' detainees. Very 'Healthy Forests!' |
| -The Detainee Photographic Records Protection Act of 2009 - passed by Senate on Friday |
Duer 157099 |
Jun-01-09 02:45 PM |
#0 |
 -
Change that is going in the wrong direction. |
endarkenment |
Jun-01-09 02:57 PM |
#1 |
| -
Obama's obsession with secrecy and power is truly becoming frightening. |
solstice |
Jun-01-09 02:59 PM |
#2 |
 -
Yes, and that the Senate is wholly on board is doubly troubling |
Duer 157099 |
Jun-01-09 03:08 PM |
#3 |
 -
Not Wholly on Board |
zett |
Jun-05-09 05:17 PM |
#51 |
| -
It's fear, pure and simple. He is isolated and feeling fearful. |
JDPriestly |
Jun-02-09 10:53 AM |
#23 |
| -
How dare you criticize Him!!!! This is the One We've Been Waiting For!! |
Syntheto |
Jun-05-09 05:57 PM |
#58 |
| -
I know!!!! Change we can believe in!!!! Let the angels sing!!!!!! |
solstice |
Jun-05-09 10:09 PM |
#60 |
| -
WTF? If we can't see it, we'll forget about it? Wow. |
K Gardner |
Jun-01-09 03:10 PM |
#4 |
| -
How can it not go to the House? |
mvd |
Jun-01-09 03:12 PM |
#5 |
| -
That's what I was wondering - this doesn't sit right with me. |
jillan |
Jun-01-09 11:39 PM |
#14 |
| -
I think they are saying that it will be added as an ammendment and not |
grantcart |
Jun-02-09 12:15 AM |
#15 |
| -
Thanks - glad it does have a final vote |
mvd |
Jun-02-09 01:37 AM |
#18 |
| -
Obama supports it. |
No Elephants |
Jun-02-09 12:22 PM |
#30 |
| -
Greenwald is being disingenuous... ever hear of SCOTUS case ACLU v. Department of Defense (06-3140)? |
zulchzulu |
Jun-01-09 03:34 PM |
#6 |
| -
Feingold is allowed to let off the hook according to some |
Jennicut |
Jun-01-09 05:15 PM |
#10 |
| -
Feingold voted against it so he ain't on no hook |
zett |
Jun-05-09 05:19 PM |
#52 |
| -
Uh...Your Own Link Confirms Greenwald And Refutes Your Claim |
Senator |
Jun-01-09 10:59 PM |
#11 |
| -
People just LOVE to go to Salon to find out how to think... |
NYC_SKP |
Jun-01-09 11:07 PM |
#12 |
| -
I read it, alright. |
Luminous Animal |
Jun-02-09 01:13 AM |
#17 |
| -
The language of the bill you posted supports Salon. |
No Elephants |
Jun-02-09 12:19 PM |
#28 |
| -
Thats been clear here for quite some time now. |
Egnever |
Jun-02-09 08:09 PM |
#46 |
| -
It didn't pass unanimously |
zett |
Jun-05-09 05:26 PM |
#54 |
| -
As opposed to singing in the choir here. |
solstice |
Jun-05-09 10:04 PM |
#59 |
| -
Feingold, Sanders and Coburn voted against the bill - link... |
slipslidingaway |
Jun-02-09 10:19 AM |
#19 |
| -
Obama has been fighting the ACLU in court to prevent disclosure. . |
No Elephants |
Jun-02-09 12:17 PM |
#27 |
| -
Greenwald has no need to go after Feingold - he voted against it |
zett |
Jun-05-09 05:21 PM |
#53 |
| -
The WH is supporting a bill by a Republican and an Independent? |
Canuckistanian |
Jun-01-09 03:36 PM |
#7 |
| -
Obama wants this covered up, so the Democrats support it. And the Republicans want it |
No Elephants |
Jun-02-09 12:21 PM |
#29 |
| -
K&R |
Wednesdays |
Jun-01-09 04:16 PM |
#8 |
| -
Rules, Laws, Transparency ...Just not "pragmatic" enough for this administration I gather |
Dragonfli |
Jun-01-09 04:49 PM |
#9 |
| -
holy shit! i had no idea!! |
inna |
Jun-01-09 11:26 PM |
#13 |
| -
What an Orwellian name - 'protecting' detainees. Very 'Healthy Forests!' |
leftstreet |
Jun-02-09 12:41 AM |
#16 |
| -
The bill's name doesn't imply it protects detainees. |
Occam Bandage |
Jun-02-09 10:21 AM |
#20 |
| -
There were three votes against the final bill... |
slipslidingaway |
Jun-02-09 10:24 AM |
#21 |
| -
Thank you for that correction |
Duer 157099 |
Jun-02-09 02:05 PM |
#40 |
| -
YW and thanks to OmmmSweetOmmm for posting the vote. n/t |
slipslidingaway |
Jun-02-09 03:16 PM |
#43 |
| -
Sorry Duer, I didn't notice that you saw the correction |
zett |
Jun-05-09 05:37 PM |
#56 |
| -
i fail to feel the faux moral outrage that many here feel. |
dionysus |
Jun-02-09 10:27 AM |
#22 |
| -
I LOVED the guy |
spiritual_gunfighter |
Jun-02-09 12:08 PM |
#25 |
| -
maybe i'm too pragmatic. while i'd like to see the bush administration locked away for treason, i |
dionysus |
Jun-02-09 12:31 PM |
#31 |
| -
So, the end justifies the means, even if the only "end" in question is Obama's 2nd term? |
No Elephants |
Jun-02-09 12:35 PM |
#34 |
| -
strawman of the highest order. were this three ring circus to occur, kiss health care, economic |
dionysus |
Jun-02-09 12:40 PM |
#36 |
| -
I think you are basically correct |
spiritual_gunfighter |
Jun-02-09 01:21 PM |
#39 |
| -
Faux moral outrage? |
No Elephants |
Jun-02-09 12:33 PM |
#32 |
| -
ok, maybe it's righteous outrage, but my argument is that by trying to take these guys down, the end |
dionysus |
Jun-02-09 12:46 PM |
#38 |
| -
and what, do you suppose, is the end result of continuing to ignore the "rule of law"?? |
Duer 157099 |
Jun-02-09 02:12 PM |
#42 |
| -
i'm not saying the situation is ideal, i'd like to see those guys thrown behind bars too. |
dionysus |
Jun-02-09 03:18 PM |
#44 |
| -
Just think that if Bush was still in the WH, what an uproar this would cause here at DU..... |
OmmmSweetOmmm |
Jun-02-09 11:59 AM |
#24 |
| -
OMG! This is so wrong. Our damn Senators are bordering on TREASON. NT |
ShortnFiery |
Jun-02-09 12:09 PM |
#26 |
| -
It is so wrong, but a charge of treason would be very hard to prove on this basis. A lot |
No Elephants |
Jun-02-09 12:42 PM |
#37 |
| -
Could our president still veto this? Secondly, when did O said he supported this. n/t |
vaberella |
Jun-02-09 12:34 PM |
#33 |
| -
Yes, he can! But, he won't. Change, my ass. Hope, my ass. |
No Elephants |
Jun-02-09 12:39 PM |
#35 |
| -
K&R |
Wednesdays |
Jun-02-09 02:12 PM |
#41 |
| -
The never look back amendment |
Generator |
Jun-02-09 07:54 PM |
#45 |
| -
What happened January 21 and January 22? |
rug |
Jun-02-09 08:20 PM |
#47 |
| -
They took all the cameras away n/t |
Duer 157099 |
Jun-02-09 09:06 PM |
#50 |
| -
It ends when we quit voting the bastards in power. |
mmonk |
Jun-02-09 08:35 PM |
#48 |
| -
First of all that amendment was slipped into the funding bill. Second, it may not survive |
ProSense |
Jun-02-09 08:40 PM |
#49 |
| -
It sucks and Glennzilla is great, but it didn't pass unanimously |
zett |
Jun-05-09 05:34 PM |
#55 |
| -
No, I didn't notice |
arcadian |
Jun-05-09 05:42 PM |
#57 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
