placton
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun May-24-09 05:20 PM
Response to Original message |
| 103. Let's Not Criticize Obama! |
|
He is ALWAYS RIGHT!! OMG!! The guy is just amazing - another Churchill!! Another Kennedy! All Hail Obama!! Such a pretty family too!! He has to break promises to keep promises - don't you see it?
|
| -All this outrage over the "prolonged detention" policy is premature and ignores what HAS changed. |
phleshdef |
May-23-09 03:57 PM |
#0 |
-
Rec'd...thanks for your post. It's a mess and I'm glad he's working |
firedupdem |
May-23-09 04:06 PM |
#1 |
-
I agree with the primise of you OP, I wish I had a solution to this problem. |
ZombieHorde |
May-23-09 04:07 PM |
#2 |
-
Get your outrage in early |
Uzybone |
May-23-09 04:12 PM |
#3 |
-
You first. n/t |
5X |
May-23-09 04:13 PM |
#4 |
-
Adults Only! |
NYC_SKP |
May-23-09 04:27 PM |
#5 |
-
Well said. nt |
quiet.american |
May-23-09 05:25 PM |
#6 |
-
The outrage proves the adage that nothing is impossible to those who do not have to do it. |
ClarkUSA |
May-23-09 05:28 PM |
#7 |
 -
Rubbish. Please find a human rights or constitutional scholar |
EFerrari |
May-24-09 01:14 AM |
#22 |
-
Constitutional scholar: John Yoo |
Autonomy |
May-24-09 02:19 PM |
#84 |
-
LOL! You're right about Yoo. But the specious privileging of |
EFerrari |
May-24-09 02:31 PM |
#85 |
-
"These people would kill you and your entire family just because you are American" |
rug |
May-23-09 05:47 PM |
#8 |
-
Thanks for thinking this |
Cha |
May-23-09 05:54 PM |
#9 |
-
"no one knows the details of how this is going to be carried out" |
mzmolly |
May-23-09 08:17 PM |
#10 |
-
oh stop it! |
EquallyExhausted |
May-23-09 09:18 PM |
#11 |
 -
that's supposed to include snark tags |
EquallyExhausted |
May-23-09 09:20 PM |
#12 |
-
That's what I've been thinking...... |
FrenchieCat |
May-23-09 11:23 PM |
#13 |
 -
Too bad Rachel Maddow can't see it that way... |
jenmito |
May-23-09 11:39 PM |
#15 |
 -
The mess that Bush left is horrible but Obama is responsible for his own positions. |
EFerrari |
May-24-09 12:37 AM |
#19 |
-
The other Dems need to have the light shown on them for their NIMBY bullshit also. |
SemiCharmedQuark |
May-24-09 01:33 AM |
#24 |
 -
Absolutely. Our crazy uncles in the Senate and the weenies in the House |
EFerrari |
May-24-09 01:41 AM |
#25 |
-
God, I am so sick of the total turn around....... |
springhill |
May-24-09 02:33 AM |
#26 |
-
I always wanted to be the 24th person to recommend a thread! |
jenmito |
May-23-09 11:36 PM |
#14 |
-
We Should Call This What It Really Is -- Paranoid Detention |
Senator |
May-23-09 11:40 PM |
#16 |
 -
How do you know for sure what the threat is? |
creeksneakers2 |
May-24-09 03:02 PM |
#87 |
-
No one knows "for sure" ... |
Senator |
May-24-09 09:38 PM |
#110 |
-
Thank you for your thoughtful OP. |
Brigid |
May-24-09 12:11 AM |
#17 |
-
The administration presented an idea that is incompatible with the rule of law |
EFerrari |
May-24-09 12:36 AM |
#18 |
 -
Bingo what EFerrari said |
Vincardog |
May-24-09 12:42 AM |
#20 |
 -
You have no idea how this would be put into practice so you have no idea what its in line with. |
phleshdef |
May-24-09 06:03 AM |
#27 |
  -
What difference does it make? |
Raineyb |
May-24-09 10:58 AM |
#38 |
  -
Nope, the other guy's assumptions are better |
DireStrike |
May-24-09 11:12 AM |
#47 |
  -
Why would you need details to know that holding someone without charging them |
EFerrari |
May-24-09 01:25 PM |
#74 |
 -
Habeas corpus was so last century. Only the choir sings this is ok. nt |
Mithreal |
May-24-09 10:36 AM |
#35 |
-
The house band is a little off key |
Moochy |
May-24-09 12:14 PM |
#58 |
-
"To some degree it matters who's in office"......... |
flyarm |
May-24-09 12:50 AM |
#21 |
-
I don't see what's so complicated here. |
Usrename |
May-24-09 01:30 AM |
#23 |
 -
Here here! |
grahamhgreen |
May-24-09 09:30 AM |
#30 |
 -
Basic human rights aren't in style when the President says so. nt |
Mithreal |
May-24-09 10:38 AM |
#36 |
 -
Presumption of innocence doesn't apply to external threats |
geek tragedy |
May-24-09 11:01 AM |
#41 |
  -
Considering he is a human being, the Constitution does |
Mithreal |
May-24-09 11:21 AM |
#50 |
  -
If he is considered a person... |
Usrename |
May-25-09 09:57 AM |
#117 |
 -
It's not that clear because this resembles a war |
creeksneakers2 |
May-24-09 03:06 PM |
#88 |
-
I guess they are a separate sub-species of non-humans. |
Usrename |
May-25-09 09:52 AM |
#116 |
-
Thank you for the thoughtful OP nt |
Adelante |
May-24-09 07:51 AM |
#28 |
-
Most of the people detained have been innocent. Your logic is tortured. |
grahamhgreen |
May-24-09 09:27 AM |
#29 |
-
He's attacking habeus corpus and our constitution - you know, the costitution he swore to defend, |
grahamhgreen |
May-24-09 09:40 AM |
#31 |
 -
Right on, and I am sure he can find some lawyers to defend his position |
Mithreal |
May-24-09 10:44 AM |
#37 |
-
First you have to have EVIDENCE, most of these people are guilty because? |
HillbillyBob |
May-24-09 09:57 AM |
#32 |
 -
If there were real evidence they could be tried. |
Mithreal |
May-24-09 01:32 PM |
#75 |
-
Don't pretend to know us. |
mmonk |
May-24-09 10:06 AM |
#33 |
 -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
May-24-09 11:01 AM |
#42 |
-
It's unconstitutional pure and simple. |
mmonk |
May-24-09 11:13 AM |
#48 |
 -
Geek hasn't read the Constitution. nt |
Mithreal |
May-24-09 11:22 AM |
#51 |
  -
I'm all for people reading it and highly recommend it. |
mmonk |
May-24-09 11:41 AM |
#53 |
 -
The problem is you only think you understand |
geek tragedy |
May-24-09 12:18 PM |
#62 |
 -
The problem is without evidence, one tends to play god. |
mmonk |
May-24-09 01:43 PM |
#78 |
 -
I apologize for my directness. |
mmonk |
May-24-09 02:12 PM |
#83 |
 -
We all know what the Constitution doesn't say. |
Mithreal |
May-24-09 04:32 PM |
#102 |
 -
It entitles them to a fair trial and theright to challenge their detention in court, this is what |
grahamhgreen |
May-24-09 07:24 PM |
#107 |
 -
The right to challenge their detention, yes. |
geek tragedy |
May-25-09 09:29 AM |
#112 |
 -
Congress has the power to declare war |
creeksneakers2 |
May-24-09 03:12 PM |
#89 |
-
I see no reason to abandon our laws because a war is declared. |
mmonk |
May-24-09 03:28 PM |
#94 |
-
The SCOTUS has ruled that the government has to provide |
geek tragedy |
May-25-09 09:35 AM |
#115 |
-
Yes, you are. |
Forkboy |
May-24-09 11:43 AM |
#54 |
-
The outrage is not "premature." |
noamnety |
May-24-09 10:26 AM |
#34 |
 -
MOST detainees will in fact be tried so the ones that are innocent will likely be let go. |
phleshdef |
May-24-09 10:59 AM |
#39 |
-
"known terrorists" can't be tried like anybody else? |
ima_sinnic |
May-24-09 11:18 AM |
#49 |
 -
It's possible to be certain and unable to hold a trial |
creeksneakers2 |
May-24-09 03:17 PM |
#91 |
-
how convenient, that the informant "can't be revealed" |
ima_sinnic |
May-24-09 03:29 PM |
#95 |
-
I also said confirmed by a listening device |
creeksneakers2 |
May-24-09 03:49 PM |
#97 |
-
gee, how do people ever get busted for conspiracy and brought to trial? |
ima_sinnic |
May-24-09 05:34 PM |
#104 |
-
The stakes |
creeksneakers2 |
May-24-09 07:39 PM |
#108 |
-
you mean like the 10 year old and 14 & 15 year old boys sent to Gitmo by Bush?????? |
flyarm |
May-24-09 12:23 PM |
#65 |
-
Excessive overreacting, throwing out silly scenarious and using a billion ??? characters... |
phleshdef |
May-26-09 09:07 AM |
#121 |
-
I can't believe so many people support this. |
DireStrike |
May-24-09 11:00 AM |
#40 |
 -
Belonging to an organization dedicated to killing Americans |
geek tragedy |
May-24-09 11:02 AM |
#43 |
  -
Do they actually get little Al Qaeda membership cards now? |
noamnety |
May-24-09 11:04 AM |
#44 |
   -
They train at AQ camps, they swear allegiance, same |
geek tragedy |
May-24-09 12:15 PM |
#60 |
  -
How do you know they trained at AQ camps or swore allegiance? |
Bjorn Against |
May-24-09 12:38 PM |
#70 |
   -
Federal courts will be the judge of that. |
geek tragedy |
May-25-09 09:34 AM |
#114 |
  -
If they were all getting trials in federal court we wouldn't be debating this. |
Bjorn Against |
May-25-09 10:41 AM |
#119 |
  -
AQ members aren't entitled to trials. |
geek tragedy |
May-25-09 11:45 AM |
#120 |
  -
First, there isn't any evidence of that with the vast majority of these people. |
noamnety |
May-24-09 01:34 PM |
#76 |
  -
excellent analogy! I will have to use that in these threads |
ima_sinnic |
May-24-09 06:32 PM |
#106 |
  -
If they belong to an enemy organization like AQ, that |
geek tragedy |
May-25-09 09:32 AM |
#113 |
  -
The Constitution is stronger than your demonstrated fears. nt |
Mithreal |
May-24-09 11:07 AM |
#45 |
  -
And you don't see the potential for abuse made possible by that framework? |
DireStrike |
May-24-09 11:08 AM |
#46 |
   -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
May-24-09 12:13 PM |
#57 |
  -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
May-24-09 12:19 PM |
#64 |
  -
That is not what the previous poster said. |
Bjorn Against |
May-24-09 12:39 PM |
#71 |
  -
ooohhhh, hide under the bed!!! oh, I AM SO AFWAID!!! |
ima_sinnic |
May-24-09 11:23 AM |
#52 |
  -
Deleted sub-thread |
Name removed |
May-24-09 11:44 AM |
#55 |
  -
Deleted sub-thread |
Name removed |
May-24-09 11:59 AM |
#56 |
  -
The far left like Pat Tillman? |
EFerrari |
May-24-09 01:55 PM |
#80 |
 -
This is DU |
Moochy |
May-24-09 12:15 PM |
#59 |
-
Do you really think Obama is further from the American mainstream |
geek tragedy |
May-24-09 12:16 PM |
#61 |
 -
I have NEVER seen a "free the terrorists" post from a non-low-post troll poster |
LostinVA |
May-24-09 12:19 PM |
#63 |
  -
Nah... |
Mythsaje |
May-24-09 12:34 PM |
#67 |
 -
LOL |
EFerrari |
May-24-09 01:52 PM |
#79 |
-
Yes, the opposition are Marxists. |
Mythsaje |
May-24-09 12:35 PM |
#68 |
-
Have to disagree strongly. No more indefinite detentions! |
jonestonesusa |
May-24-09 12:31 PM |
#66 |
 -
"President Obama Announces Tribunal Changes That Bring Them In Line With The Rule Of Law" |
ClarkUSA |
May-24-09 03:35 PM |
#96 |
-
I totally disagree. Either we are a nation of laws or we are not. In the |
MasonJar |
May-24-09 12:36 PM |
#69 |
-
Bullshit...... |
Tangerine LaBamba |
May-24-09 12:41 PM |
#72 |
 -
CO-SIGN |
DerekJ |
May-24-09 03:55 PM |
# |
-
Ah, the "These are evil bad terrible terrorist evil dudes" defense. Where have I heard that before? |
dorkulon |
May-24-09 12:57 PM |
#73 |
-
Unlimited imprisonment without due process is a violation of the Constitution. Period. |
Better Believe It |
May-24-09 01:39 PM |
#77 |
 -
Who said "unlimited imprisonment" but you? Pres. Obama restored due process for detainees. |
ClarkUSA |
May-24-09 03:27 PM |
#93 |
-
With all due respect, Obama doesn't make law. |
mmonk |
May-24-09 03:55 PM |
#98 |
-
I never said he could "make law"; however these immediate rule changes were made by executive order. |
ClarkUSA |
May-24-09 04:08 PM |
#101 |
-
I have one big problem with giving the DOJ and Congress any more time. |
mmonk |
May-25-09 09:09 AM |
#111 |
-
lol "terrorist scum". Maybe most people who are arrested are criminal scum |
LittleBlue |
May-24-09 02:09 PM |
#81 |
-
How Long? How Long Has This Been Going On??? IT IS NOW TIME |
ChiciB1 |
May-24-09 02:11 PM |
#82 |
-
the utter vacuousness of your argument is made plain by the use of the word "scum" |
bread_and_roses |
May-24-09 02:39 PM |
#86 |
-
I agree with you. Now, in the meantime, |
Enthusiast |
May-24-09 03:15 PM |
#90 |
-
K & R |
creeksneakers2 |
May-24-09 03:22 PM |
#92 |
-
I asked my self, would a president voluntarily restrict his executive powers?! |
DerekJ |
May-24-09 03:59 PM |
#99 |
-
To make excuses to keep human beings locked up indefinitely is just wrong... |
winyanstaz |
May-24-09 04:07 PM |
#100 |
-
Let's Not Criticize Obama! |
placton |
May-24-09 05:20 PM |
#103 |
 -
Ah, I was waiting for someone to trot out that ol' red herring again. Epic fail... |
ClarkUSA |
May-24-09 06:05 PM |
#105 |
 -
Who said that? |
creeksneakers2 |
May-24-09 07:53 PM |
#109 |
-
dangerous precedent |
thread-bear |
May-25-09 10:26 AM |
#118 |