Donate to DU!
Democratic Underground Latest Threads
Latest
Greatest Threads
Greatest
Lobby
Lobby
Journals
Journals
Search
Search
Options
Options
Help
Help
Login
Login
Google

Reply #4: Executive Order of 1/22/09 re lawful interrogations [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
First thread | Last thread
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr-30-09 09:58 AM
Response to Original message
4. Executive Order of 1/22/09 re lawful interrogations
THE WHITE HOUSE

Office of the Press Secretary

For Immediate Release January 22, 2009

EXECUTIVE ORDER

ENSURING LAWFUL INTERROGATIONS

By the authority vested in me by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, in order to improve the effectiveness of human intelligence gathering, to promote the safe, lawful, and humane treatment of individuals in United States custody and of United States personnel who are detained in armed conflicts, to ensure compliance with the treaty obligations of the United States, including the Geneva Conventions, and to take care that the laws of the United States are faithfully executed, I hereby order as follows:

Section 1. Revocation. Executive Order 13440 of July 20, 2007, is revoked. All executive directives, orders, and regulations inconsistent with this order, including but not limited to those issued to or by the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) from September 11, 2001, to January 20, 2009, concerning detention or the interrogation of detained individuals, are revoked to the extent of their inconsistency with this order. Heads of departments and agencies shall take all necessary steps to ensure that all directives, orders, and regulations of their respective departments or agencies are consistent with this order. Upon request, the Attorney General shall provide guidance about which directives, orders, and regulations are inconsistent with this order.

Sec. 2. Definitions. As used in this order:

(a) “Army Field Manual 2 22.3″ means FM 2-22.3, Human Intelligence Collector Operations, issued by the Department of the Army on September 6, 2006.

(b) “Army Field Manual 34-52″ means FM 34-52, Intelligence Interrogation, issued by the Department of the Army on May 8, 1987.

(c) “Common Article 3″ means Article 3 of each of the Geneva Conventions.

(d) “Convention Against Torture” means the Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, December 10, 1984, 1465 U.N.T.S. 85, S. Treaty Doc. No. 100 20 (1988).

(e) “Geneva Conventions” means:

(i) the Convention for the Amelioration of the Condition of the Wounded and Sick in Armed Forces in the Field, August 12, 1949 (6 UST 3114);

(ii) the Convention for the Amelioration of the Condition of Wounded, Sick and Shipwrecked Members of Armed Forces at Sea, August 12, 1949 (6 UST 3217);

(iii) the Convention Relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, August 12, 1949 (6 UST 3316); and

(iv) the Convention Relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War, August 12, 1949 (6 UST 3516).

(f) “Treated humanely,” “violence to life and person,” “murder of all kinds,” “mutilation,” “cruel treatment,” “torture,” “outrages upon personal dignity,” and “humiliating and degrading treatment” refer to, and have the same meaning as, those same terms in Common Article 3.

(g) The terms “detention facilities” and “detention facility” in section 4(a) of this order do not refer to facilities used only to hold people on a short-term, transitory basis.

Sec. 3. Standards and Practices for Interrogation of Individuals in the Custody or Control of the United States in Armed Conflicts.

(a) Common Article 3 Standards as a Minimum Baseline. Consistent with the requirements of the Federal torture statute, 18 U.S.C. 2340 2340A, section 1003 of the Detainee Treatment Act of 2005, 42 U.S.C. 2000dd, the Convention Against Torture, Common Article 3, and other laws regulating the treatment and interrogation of individuals detained in any armed conflict, such persons shall in all circumstances be treated humanely and shall not be subjected to violence to life and person (including murder of all kinds, mutilation, cruel treatment, and torture), nor to outrages upon personal dignity (including humiliating and degrading treatment), whenever such individuals are in the custody or under the effective control of an officer, employee, or other agent of the United States Government or detained within a facility owned, operated, or controlled by a department or agency of the United States.

(b) Interrogation Techniques and Interrogation-Related Treatment. Effective immediately, an individual in the custody or under the effective control of an officer, employee, or other agent of the United States Government, or detained within a facility owned, operated, or controlled by a department or agency of the United States, in any armed conflict, shall not be subjected to any interrogation technique or approach, or any treatment related to interrogation, that is not authorized by and listed in Army Field Manual 2 22.3 (Manual). Interrogation techniques, approaches, and treatments described in the Manual shall be implemented strictly in accord with the principles, processes, conditions, and limitations the Manual prescribes. Where processes required by the Manual, such as a requirement of approval by specified Department of Defense officials, are inapposite to a department or an agency other than the Department of Defense, such a department or agency shall use processes that are substantially equivalent to the processes the Manual prescribes for the Department of Defense. Nothing in this section shall preclude the Federal Bureau of Investigation, or other Federal law enforcement agencies, from continuing to use authorized, non-coercive techniques of interrogation that are designed to elicit voluntary statements and do not involve the use of force, threats, or promises.

(c) Interpretations of Common Article 3 and the Army Field Manual. From this day forward, unless the Attorney General with appropriate consultation provides further guidance, officers, employees, and other agents of the United States Government may, in conducting interrogations, act in reliance upon Army Field Manual 2 22.3, but may not, in conducting interrogations, rely upon any interpretation of the law governing interrogation — including interpretations of Federal criminal laws, the Convention Against Torture, Common Article 3, Army Field Manual 2 22.3, and its predecessor document, Army Field Manual 34 52 issued by the Department of Justice between September 11, 2001, and January 20, 2009.

Sec. 4. Prohibition of Certain Detention Facilities, and Red Cross Access to Detained Individuals.

(a) CIA Detention. The CIA shall close as expeditiously as possible any detention facilities that it currently operates and shall not operate any such detention facility in the future.

(b) International Committee of the Red Cross Access to Detained Individuals. All departments and agencies of the Federal Government shall provide the International Committee of the Red Cross with notification of, and timely access to, any individual detained in any armed conflict in the custody or under the effective control of an officer, employee, or other agent of the United States Government or detained within a facility owned, operated, or controlled by a department or agency of the United States Government, consistent with Department of Defense regulations and policies.

Sec. 5. Special Interagency Task Force on Interrogation and Transfer Policies.

(a) Establishment of Special Interagency Task Force. There shall be established a Special Task Force on Interrogation and Transfer Policies (Special Task Force) to review interrogation and transfer policies.

(b) Membership. The Special Task Force shall consist of the following members, or their designees:

(i) the Attorney General, who shall serve as Chair;

(ii) the Director of National Intelligence, who shall serve as Co-Vice-Chair;

(iii) the Secretary of Defense, who shall serve as Co-Vice-Chair;

(iv) the Secretary of State;

(v) the Secretary of Homeland Security;

(vi) the Director of the Central Intelligence Agency;

(vii) the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff; and

(viii) other officers or full-time or permanent part time employees of the United States, as determined by the Chair, with the concurrence of the head of the department or agency concerned.

(c) Staff. The Chair may designate officers and employees within the Department of Justice to serve as staff to support the Special Task Force. At the request of the Chair, officers and employees from other departments or agencies may serve on the Special Task Force with the concurrence of the head of the department or agency that employ such individuals. Such staff must be officers or full-time or permanent part-time employees of the United States. The Chair shall designate an officer or employee of the Department of Justice to serve as the Executive Secretary of the Special Task Force.

(d) Operation. The Chair shall convene meetings of the Special Task Force, determine its agenda, and direct its work. The Chair may establish and direct subgroups of the Special Task Force, consisting exclusively of members of the Special Task Force, to deal with particular subjects.

(e) Mission. The mission of the Special Task Force shall be:
(i) to study and evaluate whether the interrogation practices and techniques in Army Field Manual 2 22.3, when employed by departments or agencies outside the military, provide an appropriate means of acquiring the intelligence necessary to protect the Nation, and, if warranted, to recommend any additional or different guidance for other departments or agencies; and

(ii) to study and evaluate the practices of transferring individuals to other nations in order to ensure that such practices comply with the domestic laws, international obligations, and policies of the United States and do not result in the transfer of individuals to other nations to face torture or otherwise for the purpose, or with the effect, of undermining or circumventing the commitments or obligations of the United States to ensure the humane treatment of individuals in its custody or control.

(f) Administration. The Special Task Force shall be established for administrative purposes within the Department of Justice and the Department of Justice shall, to
the extent permitted by law and subject to the availability of appropriations, provide administrative support and funding for the Special Task Force.

(g) Recommendations. The Special Task Force shall provide a report to the President, through the Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs and the Counsel to the President, on the matters set forth in subsection (d) within 180 days of the date of this order, unless the Chair determines that an extension is necessary.

(h) Termination. The Chair shall terminate the Special Task Force upon the completion of its duties.

Sec. 6. Construction with Other Laws. Nothing in this order shall be construed to affect the obligations of officers, employees, and other agents of the United States Government to comply with all pertinent laws and treaties of the United States governing detention and interrogation, including but not limited to: the Fifth and Eighth Amendments to the United States Constitution; the Federal torture statute, 18 U.S.C. 2340 2340A; the War Crimes Act, 18 U.S.C. 2441; the Federal assault statute, 18 U.S.C. 113; the Federal maiming statute, 18 U.S.C. 114; the Federal “stalking” statute, 18 U.S.C. 2261A; articles 93, 124, 128, and 134 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. 893, 924, 928, and 934; section 1003 of the Detainee Treatment Act of 2005, 42 U.S.C. 2000dd; section 6(c) of the Military Commissions Act of 2006, Public Law 109 366; the Geneva Conventions; and the Convention Against Torture. Nothing in this order shall be construed to diminish any rights that any individual may have under these or other laws and treaties. This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity against the United States, its departments, agencies, or other entities, its officers or employees, or any other person.

BARACK OBAMA

THE WHITE HOUSE,
January 22, 2009.


http://washingtonindependent.com/26836/executive-order-...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  Mr. President, stop saying you banned torture. Deep13  Apr-30-09 09:37 AM   #0 
   "severe" "extreme" "substantial"  sandnsea   Apr-30-09 09:48 AM   #1 
   Those things are argued in courts all the time, the arguing  merh   Apr-30-09 10:00 AM   #5 
   If you define all uncomfortable conditions  sandnsea   Apr-30-09 11:19 AM   #14 
      That's not the loopholes I refer to.  merh   Apr-30-09 11:30 AM   #18 
         Yes, uncomfortable conditions  sandnsea   Apr-30-09 12:04 PM   #34 
   I guess we should let a jury decide. nt  Deep13   Apr-30-09 10:21 AM   #7 
      Well, now waterboarding is defined as torture  sandnsea   Apr-30-09 11:14 AM   #12 
      If the cases are prosecuted, the jury will decide...  Deep13   Apr-30-09 11:50 AM   #28 
      I think we should, rather, use the power of the Executive branch to clarify the situation  Occam Bandage   Apr-30-09 11:31 AM   #19 
         Those are judgment call questions are for juries to decide.  Deep13   Apr-30-09 11:48 AM   #27 
            No, they are not. They are why we have an Executive Branch.  Occam Bandage   Apr-30-09 11:57 AM   #30 
               "Political pressure ought not have anything to do with how the AG determines past violations"  Deep13   Apr-30-09 12:09 PM   #36 
               "My impression is that POTUS is preventing Holder from proceeding."  Occam Bandage   Apr-30-09 12:15 PM   #41 
               this may answer the question for you whether waterboarding is torture..  flyarm   Apr-30-09 09:28 PM   #57 
   He re-banned it. The booshies made it 'legal', remember.  tekisui   Apr-30-09 09:49 AM   #2 
   Sure I remember. They had no legal authority to do it.  Deep13   Apr-30-09 10:22 AM   #8 
   that what the powdered faces on television keep saying...."Catapults!!"  Supersedeas   May-05-09 10:53 AM   #73 
   I hadn't thought about it in that way but you are absolutely correct.  seaglass   Apr-30-09 09:50 AM   #3 
   Executive Order of 1/22/09 re lawful interrogations  Adelante   Apr-30-09 09:58 AM   #4 
   Yes and bravo. But Bush never had the power to allow it.  Deep13   Apr-30-09 10:24 AM   #9 
   This was a VERY clear signal  BelgianMadCow   Apr-30-09 10:49 AM   #10 
   Thanks for that  Egnever   Apr-30-09 11:36 PM   #60 
   .  merh   Apr-30-09 10:05 AM   #6 
   Didn't President Obama say  Froward69   Apr-30-09 11:01 AM   #11 
   Thank  Cha   Apr-30-09 11:17 AM   #13 
   Yes and no. Maybe he didn't say he "banned it" per se, but the central point is still valid.  Towlie   Apr-30-09 11:22 AM   #15 
   No, he didn't really.  Occam Bandage   Apr-30-09 11:29 AM   #17 
      answer to whether waterboarding is illegal..  flyarm   Apr-30-09 09:30 PM   #58 
         You'll note that you said, "the DOJ defines waterboarding as torture."  Occam Bandage   May-05-09 01:07 AM   #71 
   What's the difference?  Deep13   Apr-30-09 11:52 AM   #29 
      "What's the difference?"  Occam Bandage   Apr-30-09 11:58 AM   #32 
         So you don't know either. nt  Deep13   Apr-30-09 12:11 PM   #38 
            Maybe you could look at one of the number of posts I've made in this thread where I explain it. nt  Occam Bandage   Apr-30-09 12:16 PM   #42 
   I don't recall him ever saying he "banned" it.  Occam Bandage   Apr-30-09 11:24 AM   #16 
   I disagree.. he has been adamant that this will never happen again  Peacetrain   Apr-30-09 11:34 AM   #20 
   That is not the same as claiming to have "banned" it, either.  Occam Bandage   Apr-30-09 11:37 AM   #22 
      I agree with that..  Peacetrain   Apr-30-09 11:46 AM   #25 
   Right. Axelrod is the one who said Obama banned it  Old Hank   May-05-09 12:51 AM   #69 
   This is FAUX OUTRAGE!!!  vaberella   Apr-30-09 11:36 AM   #21 
   I agree. The entire thing is  Occam Bandage   Apr-30-09 11:38 AM   #23 
   Until he sees that the e loopholes in the Army Field Manual are closed  merh   Apr-30-09 11:42 AM   #24 
   That's very nice, but not what the OP is about. nt  Occam Bandage   Apr-30-09 11:48 AM   #26 
   And neither is the post I replied to.  merh   Apr-30-09 11:58 AM   #31 
   I realize that he welcomes criticism.  vaberella   Apr-30-09 12:05 PM   #35 
      The only outrage I read in this thread would be your outrage.  merh   Apr-30-09 12:12 PM   #39 
         And...from what I know...  vaberella   Apr-30-09 12:25 PM   #47 
            The OP's post is legitimate  merh   Apr-30-09 12:29 PM   #48 
               As I stated.  vaberella   Apr-30-09 12:37 PM   #50 
                  And as I said, get past the word "banned" which annoys you so  merh   Apr-30-09 12:40 PM   #52 
   Banned vs. ended is an academic distinction.  Deep13   Apr-30-09 12:03 PM   #33 
      No, it is not, and it is not remotely.  Occam Bandage   Apr-30-09 12:11 PM   #37 
      Attacking him?  Deep13   Apr-30-09 12:15 PM   #40 
         "I merely said that I disagree with something that the president did"  Occam Bandage   Apr-30-09 12:17 PM   #43 
      You presume a lot about me.  vaberella   Apr-30-09 12:20 PM   #45 
   What is the exact quote that you are torturing into a strawman argument against Pres. Obama?  ClarkUSA   Apr-30-09 12:19 PM   #44 
   See post#15...there's a direct quote there of Pres.O's speech.  vaberella   Apr-30-09 12:21 PM   #46 
      Deleted message  Name removed   Apr-30-09 12:35 PM   #49 
      So the OP is misstating the case. I thought so. Thanks.  ClarkUSA   May-01-09 06:31 PM   #68 
   In what way do you consider this bullshit to be constructive criticism?  HiFructosePronSyrup   Apr-30-09 12:39 PM   #51 
   This OP is based on an inaccuracy and therefore is just really STUPID  DevonRex   Apr-30-09 01:18 PM   #53 
   Flamebait. n/t  guruoo   Apr-30-09 01:40 PM   #54 
   Don't forget the UN Convention Against Torture  crimsonblue   Apr-30-09 02:41 PM   #55 
   He didn't. He discontinued the policy of his predecessor because it was already banned long ago.  AtomicKitten   Apr-30-09 02:47 PM   #56 
   So if the Bush Administration...  stillcool   Apr-30-09 10:22 PM   #59 
   Because the previous ones DIDN'T declare a legal basis  Prophet 451   May-01-09 09:44 AM   #61 
      the whole purpose...  stillcool   May-01-09 12:44 PM   #64 
         You can ignore it  Prophet 451   May-01-09 02:05 PM   #65 
            Can you keep using it?  stillcool   May-01-09 02:29 PM   #66 
               Depends  Prophet 451   May-01-09 06:07 PM   #67 
   Agreed  Prophet 451   May-01-09 09:46 AM   #62 
   Very good point!!  OwnedByFerrets   May-01-09 09:57 AM   #63 
   Except for the fact that Obama never claimed to have banned it, yes!  Occam Bandage   May-05-09 12:59 AM   #70 
   Its not up to Presidents to decide which laws are to be obeyed  mmonk   May-05-09 04:24 AM   #72 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals  |  Links  |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2009 Democratic Underground, LLC