depakid
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-25-09 05:14 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
| 10. His track record on politics has been pretty damn accurate |
|
and so I tend not to dimiss what he has to say in that regard- particularly when it lines up with historical tendencies.
Call me old school, I guess.
|
| -Krugman is ignoring parts of the Geithner plan |
BootinUp |
Mar-25-09 04:53 PM |
#0 |
 -
Maybe it is best if Krugman he doesn't deal with this part of the issue..... |
FrenchieCat |
Mar-25-09 04:57 PM |
#1 |
  -
krugman is was too personal and |
Cha |
Mar-25-09 05:11 PM |
#9 |
| -
If only I could recommend a post within a thread! |
AZBlue |
Mar-25-09 10:22 PM |
#15 |
| -
The problem with Krugman is that he has gone |
Political Tiger |
Mar-25-09 04:59 PM |
#2 |
| -
What... so you're telling us that we want to avoid panic? |
redqueen |
Mar-25-09 05:00 PM |
#3 |
| -
That's not what the OP said. When the OP said avoiding bank runs... |
vaberella |
Mar-25-09 10:10 PM |
#14 |
| -
Sorry, yes... |
redqueen |
Mar-26-09 09:33 AM |
#29 |
| -
He's not ignoring it- he just questions whether the administration will have the political capital |
depakid |
Mar-25-09 05:02 PM |
#4 |
| -
does he have nobel prize in politics as well? |
asphalt.jungle |
Mar-25-09 05:08 PM |
#7 |
| -
His track record on politics has been pretty damn accurate |
depakid |
Mar-25-09 05:14 PM |
#10 |
| -
yeah he was on the ball with all his political prognostications |
asphalt.jungle |
Mar-25-09 09:49 PM |
#11 |
| -
Not certain what prognostications you're referring to in that regard |
depakid |
Mar-25-09 09:57 PM |
#12 |
| -
hmmmm |
asphalt.jungle |
Mar-25-09 10:02 PM |
#13 |
| -
I don't recall ever seeing that |
depakid |
Mar-25-09 11:32 PM |
#17 |
| -
Yes, I picked that up, but he hasn't commented on the effort |
BootinUp |
Mar-25-09 05:09 PM |
#8 |
| -
But IF its a part of the plan, then what has been proposed so far will make the argument for this |
EmilyAnne |
Mar-26-09 04:07 AM |
#22 |
| -
... |
xchrom |
Mar-25-09 05:03 PM |
#5 |
| -
I almost never post things that aren't a little controversial |
BootinUp |
Mar-25-09 05:07 PM |
#6 |
| -
He mentioned it at least twice in the last week. |
girl gone mad |
Mar-26-09 01:04 AM |
#19 |
| -
Must Krugman now be faulted for ignoring an imaginary reality? |
Kurt_and_Hunter |
Mar-25-09 11:00 PM |
#16 |
| -
But most of economics is sort of imaginary. He is counting on a certain value to "toxic assets," |
EmilyAnne |
Mar-26-09 04:14 AM |
#23 |
| -
Plans are different from actions... |
grillo7 |
Mar-25-09 11:51 PM |
#18 |
| -
That's been speculated by several folks.... |
BlooInBloo |
Mar-26-09 01:10 AM |
#20 |
| -
K & R for the later read. n/t |
truedelphi |
Mar-26-09 02:23 AM |
#21 |
| -
when he wrote that column, it was before the geithner plan was out |
La Lioness Priyanka |
Mar-26-09 08:06 AM |
#24 |
| -
You're correct. Geithner is looking to nationalize... |
vaberella |
Mar-26-09 08:16 AM |
#25 |
| -
yes, and for the OUTRAGE that everyone poured on krugman, i read the column |
La Lioness Priyanka |
Mar-26-09 08:23 AM |
#27 |
| -
Apparently Krugman also said he didn't read the plan before he spoke. |
vaberella |
Mar-26-09 11:19 AM |
#31 |
| -
he said the details of the package were leaked and if they were true etc... |
La Lioness Priyanka |
Mar-26-09 11:21 AM |
#32 |
| -
Details leaked, but he didn't know the whole truth before he wrote an Op-Ed. |
vaberella |
Mar-26-09 03:06 PM |
#34 |
| -
people shouldnt blame their inability to comprehend on krugman. nt |
La Lioness Priyanka |
Mar-27-09 09:47 AM |
#35 |
| -
Nouriel Roubini's take on the plan alludes to your assertion. |
EmilyAnne |
Mar-26-09 08:17 AM |
#26 |
| -
Krugman is allowing his personal judgment detract from his professional opinion. > |
cooolandrew |
Mar-26-09 08:29 AM |
#28 |
| -
So Obama and Tim "Wall Street" Geithner are diabolically clever liars |
leftofthedial |
Mar-26-09 09:46 AM |
#30 |
| -
Krugman keeps assuming that the current economic plan is the last. |
Dawgs |
Mar-26-09 11:21 AM |
#33 |
| -
The recovery won't happen by 2010, because almost everyone is ignoring |
CAcyclist |
Mar-27-09 10:03 AM |
#36 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread