You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #24: "I think" [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
high density Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-24-09 09:41 AM
Response to Reply #19
24. "I think"
Edited on Tue Mar-24-09 09:44 AM by high density
What you and I think doesn't matter. The fact is this market will be created. The FDIC will oversee the value of these assets (mortgage backed securities.) Private equity plus the FDIC/Treasury will be involved in purchasing these assets.

This seems to be reasonable. The Treasury is accepting a lot of risk, but it's a lower level of risk than nationalization would bring yet everybody here is excited about that idea.

Edited to add: CDS are not in this program.

The Treasury Department Says:
Through this new program, non-recourse loans will be made available to investors to fund purchases of legacy securitization assets. Eligible assets are expected to include certain non-agency residential mortgage backed securities (RMBS) that were originally rated AAA and outstanding commercial mortgage-backed securities (CMBS) and asset-backed securities (ABS) that are rated AAA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Does the mathematics of the Geithner plan resonate with you? merbex  Mar-24-09 07:09 AM   #0 
  - You Should Be Supporting Our President!  MannyGoldstein   Mar-24-09 07:17 AM   #1 
  - Right! We are funneling even more wealth UPWARD. I'm not a genius but  ShortnFiery   Mar-24-09 07:20 AM   #2 
     - Not only are we funneling money upwards  merbex   Mar-24-09 07:26 AM   #3 
     - Didn't You Get The Memo?  MannyGoldstein   Mar-24-09 07:27 AM   #4 
  - It's not clear that an $84 bid on such a pool would be acceptable to the FDIC  alcibiades_mystery   Mar-24-09 07:42 AM   #5 
  - Reading comprehension problem?  merbex   Mar-24-09 07:54 AM   #6 
  - Don't be an asshole  alcibiades_mystery   Mar-24-09 07:57 AM   #7 
     - First one to swear loses the argument  merbex   Mar-24-09 08:06 AM   #8 
        - First one to insult loses, actually  alcibiades_mystery   Mar-24-09 08:33 AM   #9 
           - Not on my threads n/t  merbex   Mar-24-09 08:35 AM   #10 
              - So, you make up your own scenarios, and therevfore always win  alcibiades_mystery   Mar-24-09 08:40 AM   #11 
              - You very plainly insulted Alb.  Nicholas D Wolfwood   Mar-24-09 08:42 AM   #12 
                 - Write a post and make up your own rules about insulting someone  merbex   Mar-24-09 08:50 AM   #13 
                    - No, I'd like to address your false assertion that you didn't insult Alb first.  Nicholas D Wolfwood   Mar-24-09 08:55 AM   #15 
                       - Odd that I actually did argue the math below  Teaser   Mar-24-09 09:17 AM   #16 
                          - You did, you are just impatient n/t  merbex   Mar-24-09 09:30 AM   #20 
  - Correct, People Are Overlooking (Purposely?) The Oversight Component Of The Plan  Beetwasher   Mar-24-09 09:39 AM   #23 
     - Krugman's implication is that oversight is impossible  alcibiades_mystery   Mar-24-09 10:59 AM   #27 
  - The mathematics make perfect sense  Teaser   Mar-24-09 08:52 AM   #14 
  - Bingo, so now our values come into play  merbex   Mar-24-09 09:26 AM   #18 
  - value, not "values". Our values don't enter into it.  Teaser   Mar-24-09 10:50 AM   #26 
  - And Don't Forget The Value Of COMPETENT OVERSIGHT  Beetwasher   Mar-24-09 09:34 AM   #21 
  - Lots of assumptions going on  high density   Mar-24-09 09:17 AM   #17 
     - Is a CDS worthless? We don't even know if these are some of 'assets'  merbex   Mar-24-09 09:29 AM   #19 
        - Huh?  Beetwasher   Mar-24-09 09:36 AM   #22 
        - "I think"  high density   Mar-24-09 09:41 AM   #24 
           - Right, Even A 15% Reduction In Risk Is How Many Billions?  Beetwasher   Mar-24-09 09:43 AM   #25 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC