mix
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-22-09 10:28 AM
Response to Original message |
| 41. You realize Wall Street is playing you, right? |
| -You guys realize that you're being played by Krugman, right? |
Dawgs |
Mar-22-09 09:45 AM |
#0 |
 -
What is with this obsession? |
tekisui |
Mar-22-09 09:46 AM |
#1 |
  -
Because it's fun. |
Dawgs |
Mar-22-09 09:48 AM |
#5 |
| -
I don't think they want to realize that |
NJmaverick |
Mar-22-09 09:47 AM |
#2 |
| -
It's funny. In physics, a pendulum will swing back to its original spot.... |
BlooInBloo |
Mar-22-09 09:48 AM |
#3 |
| -
I agree with Rahm |
wyldwolf |
Mar-22-09 09:48 AM |
#4 |
| -
Anyone who says anything even remotely negative about Obama is no better than Rush. |
Pale Blue Dot |
Mar-22-09 09:49 AM |
#6 |
| -
exactly! Get rid of those Nobel winners. They have nothing to offer! |
DrDan |
Mar-22-09 09:51 AM |
#9 |
| -
Making shit up ain't going to prove your point. |
Dawgs |
Mar-22-09 09:55 AM |
#12 |
| -
you don't like him because he is offering criticism relative to the administration's economic plan |
DrDan |
Mar-22-09 10:19 AM |
#35 |
| -
Yes, that is NOT true. |
Dawgs |
Mar-22-09 10:34 AM |
#48 |
| -
see 61 for apology |
DrDan |
Mar-22-09 11:29 AM |
#63 |
| -
What economic plan? |
stillcool |
Mar-22-09 11:16 AM |
#60 |
| -
Huh? I have no problem with anyone criticizing Obama. |
Dawgs |
Mar-22-09 09:53 AM |
#10 |
| -
Remotely negative?? More like CONSTANT harping and |
Phx_Dem |
Mar-22-09 10:28 AM |
#42 |
| -
... |
Pale Blue Dot |
Mar-22-09 11:06 AM |
#55 |
| -
You just proved my point. |
Phx_Dem |
Mar-22-09 11:56 AM |
#66 |
| -
"Never been faced before"? Huh? |
PVnRT |
Mar-23-09 03:27 PM |
#88 |
| -
You talking about Paul Krugman? Here's why I think Paul Krugman is a talking ass-h |
Sarah Ibarruri |
Mar-22-09 09:50 AM |
#7 |
| -
WORLD TRADE enables every country in the world to participate |
elleng |
Mar-22-09 09:59 AM |
#16 |
| -
UH not exactly. Mobility is expensive and the ones therefore running the show are the RICH |
Sarah Ibarruri |
Mar-22-09 10:00 AM |
#19 |
| -
Yes, mobility is expensive, and |
elleng |
Mar-22-09 10:17 AM |
#31 |
| -
Yep, regulations are good, however, you can't enforce regulations in other countries |
Sarah Ibarruri |
Mar-22-09 10:18 AM |
#33 |
| -
I suggested that |
elleng |
Mar-22-09 10:25 AM |
#38 |
| -
No way you can enforce rules and regulations in another country |
Sarah Ibarruri |
Mar-22-09 10:27 AM |
#40 |
| -
WE would not enforce; |
elleng |
Mar-22-09 10:39 AM |
#49 |
| -
Oh yes of course - relying on other countries for our jobs and well being - how nice |
Sarah Ibarruri |
Mar-22-09 10:42 AM |
#50 |
| -
The answer to that is, |
elleng |
Mar-22-09 10:50 AM |
#54 |
| -
Isolated? When were isolated? And you want to know what? |
Sarah Ibarruri |
Mar-22-09 11:10 AM |
#56 |
| -
I don't 'need to believe' anything but what I see. |
elleng |
Mar-22-09 11:16 AM |
#59 |
| -
Oy vey. Do you work in some capacity that is benefited by world trade without tariffs? |
Sarah Ibarruri |
Mar-22-09 11:33 AM |
#64 |
| -
No, I'm a retired attorney. |
elleng |
Mar-22-09 11:57 AM |
#67 |
| -
Tariffs may be a huge pain, but it's been that way until recently when |
Sarah Ibarruri |
Mar-22-09 12:25 PM |
#70 |
| -
So commerce could run more freely, |
elleng |
Mar-22-09 12:48 PM |
#71 |
| -
Paralegal - recently unemployed - my firm is currently... |
Sarah Ibarruri |
Mar-22-09 04:48 PM |
#73 |
| -
Good luck to you and them. |
elleng |
Mar-23-09 07:08 AM |
#80 |
| -
Thank you. It's already looking bad for the firm, and me, I've been looking for over 1 month and |
Sarah Ibarruri |
Mar-24-09 12:14 AM |
#94 |
| -
Just saw this! |
elleng |
Mar-24-09 04:52 AM |
#98 |
| -
Weird angle of attack on Krugman |
mix |
Mar-22-09 10:31 AM |
#45 |
| -
Obama hasn't spoken too much on that, but you're probably right.... |
Sarah Ibarruri |
Mar-22-09 06:24 PM |
#76 |
| -
"Krugman won a Nobel prize for promoting world trade, didn't he"--uh, NO |
HamdenRice |
Mar-23-09 03:37 PM |
#89 |
| -
And you think that Geithner and Summers aren't enthusiastic supporters |
amandabeech |
Mar-24-09 12:46 AM |
#97 |
| -
Oy Vey |
SanchoPanza |
Mar-24-09 07:12 AM |
#99 |
| -
shades of the bush administration |
DrDan |
Mar-22-09 09:50 AM |
#8 |
| -
Where did I say anything about Obama? |
Dawgs |
Mar-22-09 09:56 AM |
#13 |
| -
so exacly what is it that you don't like about Krugman? |
DrDan |
Mar-22-09 10:17 AM |
#32 |
| -
I'm very disappointed with Obama's economic plan's. |
Dawgs |
Mar-22-09 10:32 AM |
#46 |
| -
ok - I was wrong in my assumption - there has been so much Krugman bashing |
DrDan |
Mar-22-09 11:27 AM |
#61 |
| -
We guys READ it, and THINK about it regularly. |
elleng |
Mar-22-09 09:53 AM |
#11 |
| -
Then maybe you guys should concentrate on WRITING. |
Dawgs |
Mar-22-09 09:58 AM |
#15 |
| -
Yeah! When are the anti-Obama forces going to realize |
Pale Blue Dot |
Mar-22-09 10:02 AM |
#21 |
| -
Why do you guys keep bringing up Obama? |
Dawgs |
Mar-22-09 10:19 AM |
#34 |
| -
I don't think its my job to 'convince' you of anything. |
elleng |
Mar-22-09 10:03 AM |
#22 |
| -
I smell an effort to marginalize Krugman. You will hurt Obama |
OHdem10 |
Mar-22-09 09:58 AM |
#14 |
| -
I agree. |
Dawgs |
Mar-22-09 10:01 AM |
#20 |
| -
"Krugman is no better than Rush" |
Warren Stupidity |
Mar-22-09 09:59 AM |
#17 |
| -
I'd rather be "played" by Krugman than be "played" by Obama. |
MercutioATC |
Mar-22-09 10:00 AM |
#18 |
| -
Curious. Why do you think Krugman has a better handle on the economy than Obama? |
Dawgs |
Mar-22-09 10:04 AM |
#24 |
| -
I believe Obama is doing two very dangerous things right now. |
MercutioATC |
Mar-22-09 10:11 AM |
#27 |
| -
Okay. Now give me two SPECIFIC Krugrman ideas that are better. |
Dawgs |
Mar-22-09 10:14 AM |
#29 |
| -
1) Temporary nationalization of failed banks. |
MercutioATC |
Mar-22-09 10:32 AM |
#47 |
| -
Oh geez. Can we stop with the Krugman threads already? |
Jennicut |
Mar-22-09 10:03 AM |
#23 |
| -
You don't find this fun? |
Dawgs |
Mar-22-09 10:06 AM |
#25 |
| -
LMAO! Yeah, it really worked everyone up. I could give a crap |
Jennicut |
Mar-22-09 10:07 AM |
#26 |
| -
It's interesting how some people's credibility has an exact expiration date |
Dreamer Tatum |
Mar-22-09 10:12 AM |
#28 |
| -
Maybe for other people, but not for me. |
Dawgs |
Mar-22-09 10:15 AM |
#30 |
| -
Look, if you don't like what he has to say, that's fine |
Dreamer Tatum |
Mar-22-09 10:20 AM |
#36 |
| -
Fair enough. Maybe hack was a little harsh. |
Dawgs |
Mar-22-09 10:26 AM |
#39 |
| -
Yeah, but i bet you loved him when he was hammering Bush for most of Bush's administration. |
RandomKoolzip |
Mar-22-09 10:47 AM |
#52 |
| -
When have you ever created policy? |
Bjorn Against |
Mar-22-09 12:09 PM |
#68 |
| -
Your are the one being played, not by Obama, but by the corporate special interests |
Onlooker |
Mar-22-09 10:25 AM |
#37 |
| -
I'm being played by the hands of the corporate interests? |
Dawgs |
Mar-22-09 10:29 AM |
#43 |
| -
No, because you said nothing |
Onlooker |
Mar-22-09 11:15 AM |
#58 |
| -
You realize Wall Street is playing you, right? |
mix |
Mar-22-09 10:28 AM |
#41 |
| -
How are they playing me? |
Dawgs |
Mar-22-09 10:30 AM |
#44 |
| -
You lie about Krugman, question his motivation, |
mix |
Mar-22-09 10:42 AM |
#51 |
| -
Yes, you have. |
chascarrillo |
Mar-22-09 11:28 AM |
#62 |
| -
Face the facts |
Celebration |
Mar-22-09 10:50 AM |
#53 |
| -
I respect both President Obama AND Paul Krugman. |
liberalmuse |
Mar-22-09 11:10 AM |
#57 |
| -
I've criticized Krugman when I thought he was wrong. |
The Backlash Cometh |
Mar-22-09 11:39 AM |
#65 |
| -
Enough with Krugman. How about reasonable plus and minus with any policy. All have risk. |
MarjorieG |
Mar-22-09 12:24 PM |
#69 |
| -
Funniest thread ever. It is a parody, right? |
camera obscura |
Mar-22-09 01:10 PM |
#72 |
| -
Possibly. |
Dawgs |
Mar-22-09 04:54 PM |
#74 |
| -
You are on the money - so to speak n/t |
cadmium |
Mar-22-09 06:12 PM |
#75 |
| -
yes, dr, krugmans phd from MIT, very similar to rush's 2 terms in college |
La Lioness Priyanka |
Mar-22-09 07:20 PM |
#77 |
| -
And yet they both chose to do the same(sort of) thing. |
Dawgs |
Mar-23-09 08:20 AM |
#82 |
| -
one offers an intelligent critique of policy. the other incoherent ramblings. exactly the same. nt |
La Lioness Priyanka |
Mar-23-09 08:24 AM |
#83 |
| -
Writing and/or saying bullshit and getting paid for it. |
Dawgs |
Mar-23-09 03:10 PM |
#84 |
| -
Thank you! |
bicentennial_baby |
Mar-23-09 04:16 PM |
#92 |
| -
Of course, he's a capitalist ... |
GeorgeGist |
Mar-22-09 07:53 PM |
#78 |
| -
you DO know he compared Obama supporters to NIXON's PEOPLE right??? |
burythehatchet |
Mar-22-09 07:57 PM |
#79 |
| -
No, I think Krugman falls on the in between. Krugman has many excellent points but he does NOT |
ShortnFiery |
Mar-23-09 07:22 AM |
#81 |
| -
He has always had a disdain for Obama and made no secret of that |
Liberal_Stalwart71 |
Mar-23-09 03:14 PM |
#85 |
| -
The Times is losing money hand over fist. Note on one day |
cadmium |
Mar-23-09 03:20 PM |
#86 |
| -
Jesus Christ, this place is fucking stupid sometimes. |
Forkboy |
Mar-23-09 03:25 PM |
#87 |
| -
idiots called him a freeper also |
democracy1st |
Mar-23-09 04:07 PM |
#90 |
| -
This is what passes for astute political analysis in our new & improved DU. n/t |
QC |
Mar-24-09 12:18 AM |
#96 |
| -
you realize that's nonsense, right? |
leftofthedial |
Mar-23-09 04:14 PM |
#91 |
| -
Well there's 10 seconds of my life I'll never get back. |
Political Heretic |
Mar-23-09 04:17 PM |
#93 |
| -
You're equating Krugman with Limbaugh??? |
JeffR |
Mar-24-09 12:16 AM |
#95 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread