You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #77: IT IS A BIG FUCKING DEAL UNDER THE UCMJ! [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-14-04 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #75
77. IT IS A BIG FUCKING DEAL UNDER THE UCMJ!
He can be court martialed for wearing an award he did not earn!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -UPI WRONG! Trainees are NOT qualified for ribbons their units are awarded! Walt Starr  Sep-14-04 06:12 AM   #0 
  - Sir, they do not qualify for the wear of that award - YES!!!!  merbex   Sep-14-04 06:20 AM   #1 
  - Walt,  Vote_Clark_In_WI   Sep-14-04 06:21 AM   #2 
  - Walt is Da Man.....  opihimoimoi   Sep-14-04 06:26 AM   #4 
  - Here's a post that will link you to Walt's orginal two threads  rocknation   Sep-14-04 08:40 AM   #24 
  - Good job!  salvorhardin   Sep-14-04 06:24 AM   #3 
  - Thank you for your hard work to get to the truth.  spooky3   Sep-14-04 06:31 AM   #5 
  - If UPI was right, I'd have 2 more ribbons  Catch22Dem   Sep-14-04 06:31 AM   #6 
  - How do you know he's not wrong?  hexola   Sep-14-04 06:47 AM   #7 
  - "Basic Training Squadrons" - Vague....  hexola   Sep-14-04 06:48 AM   #8 
  - Read the original UPI story  Walt Starr   Sep-14-04 08:05 AM   #12 
  - Do you have any information about the origins of the pictures...  hexola   Sep-14-04 08:10 AM   #14 
  - We know he is a second lieutenant in the picture  Walt Starr   Sep-14-04 08:12 AM   #15 
     - Was it an official photo...personal?  hexola   Sep-14-04 08:17 AM   #16 
        - It's a part of the official record released by the White House.  Walt Starr   Sep-14-04 08:25 AM   #17 
        - No not a forgery - but was it an OFFICIAL TANG photo?  hexola   Sep-14-04 08:31 AM   #18 
           - I answered your fucking question!  Walt Starr   Sep-14-04 08:35 AM   #19 
           - You won't answer the question bucause you can't...  hexola   Sep-14-04 08:39 AM   #20 
              - your rants on this issue  AmerDem   Sep-14-04 08:41 AM   #25 
              - Damn, two minutes of searching to come up with the links  Walt Starr   Sep-14-04 08:48 AM   #27 
              - Oh you mean the "Personel File"  hexola   Sep-14-04 09:03 AM   #35 
                 - Hmmm, I thought I said that  Walt Starr   Sep-14-04 09:05 AM   #36 
                 - Official is vague...  hexola   Sep-14-04 09:36 AM   #41 
                    - Doesn't really matter. "Offifical Record" pretty much covers it  Walt Starr   Sep-14-04 09:37 AM   #42 
                 - What is a "personel" file? eom  DesertDem   Sep-14-04 09:13 AM   #37 
                    - The "Official Record"  Walt Starr   Sep-14-04 09:14 AM   #39 
                    - Riiiight.  DesertDem   Sep-14-04 09:29 AM   #40 
                    - I dont know - that's from USA Today...What's an "Official file"? eom  hexola   Sep-14-04 09:38 AM   #43 
                       - I think the word you're looking for is "personnel," not "personel."  DesertDem   Sep-14-04 11:02 AM   #49 
                          - Indeed - unless we are talking about the CBS memos...  hexola   Sep-14-04 11:04 AM   #50 
              - You are silly.  Julian English   Sep-14-04 09:13 AM   #38 
              - It has accomplished one thing, though  Walt Starr   Sep-14-04 09:47 AM   #44 
                 - Atta boy, Walt! nt  hexola   Sep-14-04 09:48 AM   #46 
                    - pfff  AmerDem   Sep-14-04 09:57 AM   #47 
                    - heh  Walt Starr   Sep-14-04 10:11 AM   #48 
                    - Deleted message  Name removed   Sep-14-04 12:23 PM   #78 
              - Official or Personal DOESNT matter !!!  KBlagburn   Sep-14-04 12:15 PM   #74 
              - THANK YOU! Hope that wasn't too hard...  hexola   Sep-14-04 12:20 PM   #75 
                 - IT IS A BIG FUCKING DEAL UNDER THE UCMJ!  Walt Starr   Sep-14-04 12:22 PM   #77 
                    - WALT!!!  KBlagburn   Sep-14-04 12:35 PM   #87 
                       - Yes, my response was to another poster  Walt Starr   Sep-14-04 12:40 PM   #89 
                       - SORRY WALT!!  KBlagburn   Sep-14-04 12:45 PM   #92 
                       - New Headline: Bush photographed not wearing a medal he earned!!!  hexola   Sep-14-04 12:48 PM   #93 
                          - WTF bullshit are you spewing about now?  Walt Starr   Sep-14-04 12:50 PM   #94 
                             - See Post #87  hexola   Sep-14-04 12:51 PM   #95 
                                - Ahhhhhh, so now you're saying Bush should have been wearing the  Walt Starr   Sep-14-04 12:53 PM   #96 
                                   - You know it's too bad...  hexola   Sep-14-04 12:57 PM   #97 
                                      - The holes have all been filled up  Walt Starr   Sep-14-04 01:03 PM   #98 
                                      - I think only donors have the Search feature...  hexola   Sep-14-04 01:13 PM   #99 
                                      - Advanced Search is down right now  Walt Starr   Sep-14-04 01:23 PM   #100 
              - Deleted message  Name removed   Sep-14-04 12:21 PM   #76 
           - What is your problem  AmerDem   Sep-14-04 08:39 AM   #22 
           - They take official photographs hexola  Moonbeam_Starlight   Sep-14-04 11:26 AM   #51 
           - Of course they do  Walt Starr   Sep-14-04 11:34 AM   #52 
           - What is your proof that this is an official TANG photo?  hexola   Sep-14-04 11:41 AM   #55 
              - It was released in the official record  Walt Starr   Sep-14-04 11:43 AM   #57 
                 - I'm trying to make you look good Walt...  hexola   Sep-14-04 11:46 AM   #60 
                    - No, you're making bogus claims that the photograph is a forgery!  Walt Starr   Sep-14-04 11:53 AM   #64 
                       - Where do I claim forgery?  hexola   Sep-14-04 12:00 PM   #69 
                          - Oh, like maybe when you photoshopped the picture  Walt Starr   Sep-14-04 12:24 PM   #79 
                             - The picture is not "PhotoShopped..."  hexola   Sep-14-04 12:25 PM   #80 
                                - Yep, forgery through implication  Walt Starr   Sep-14-04 12:26 PM   #83 
           - I have no doubt they do...but...  hexola   Sep-14-04 11:37 AM   #53 
              - The same photo was released in his official records  Walt Starr   Sep-14-04 11:40 AM   #54 
                 - Released from TANG or BUSHCO?  hexola   Sep-14-04 11:44 AM   #58 
                    - Somehow, I knew you'd be claiming the photo was a forgery!  Walt Starr   Sep-14-04 11:45 AM   #59 
                       - When you find some pictures of other TANG members...  hexola   Sep-14-04 11:50 AM   #62 
                          - IT IS SOLID EVIDENCE!  Walt Starr   Sep-14-04 11:53 AM   #63 
                             - Wouldn't it be MORE SOLID...  hexola   Sep-14-04 12:02 PM   #70 
                                - No, BECAUSE IT DOES NOT MATTER!  Walt Starr   Sep-14-04 12:13 PM   #72 
                                - Deleted message  Name removed   Sep-14-04 12:13 PM   #73 
                                - what the hell is wrong with you?  bagnana   Sep-14-04 02:37 PM   #106 
           - All officers have an official photo but it doesn't look like that  jmowreader   Sep-14-04 02:50 PM   #108 
              - Heh, maybe he was *pretending* to be in a leadership billet  Walt Starr   Sep-14-04 02:56 PM   #109 
                 - Which carries on to today  jmowreader   Sep-14-04 04:56 PM   #111 
        - Besides this already being answered....  gcomeau   Sep-14-04 08:39 AM   #23 
           - The date of the photo...  hexola   Sep-14-04 08:43 AM   #26 
              - It doesn't fucking matter WHEN the photo was taken  Walt Starr   Sep-14-04 08:51 AM   #28 
              - Bush was NEVER entitled to wear the ribbon. EVER.  gcomeau   Sep-14-04 08:56 AM   #31 
              - Deleted message  Name removed   Sep-14-04 12:26 PM   #81 
  - ACTIVE DUTY, ANG, AF RESERVE BASIC TRAINING IS THE SAME  KBlagburn   Sep-14-04 12:04 PM   #71 
  - Deleted message  Name removed   Sep-14-04 11:47 AM   #61 
     - Deleted message  Name removed   Sep-14-04 11:58 AM   #67 
     - Can you document that....??  hexola   Sep-14-04 11:59 AM   #68 
     - Yes, I remember that too.  RetroLounge   Sep-14-04 12:26 PM   #82 
  - Have you ever discoverd any information about the photos...  hexola   Sep-14-04 06:59 AM   #9 
  - Don't get your panties in such a wad  unfrigginreal   Sep-14-04 07:33 AM   #11 
  - Out - STAND - ing, Mr. Starr!  TacticalPeak   Sep-14-04 07:25 AM   #10 
  - Walt, are you planning on contacting UPI with this information?  DesertDem   Sep-14-04 08:09 AM   #13 
  - Just to cross the T's and dot the I's... when did the 3724th earn AFOUA?  MallRat   Sep-14-04 08:39 AM   #21 
  - I've got a request in  Walt Starr   Sep-14-04 08:54 AM   #29 
  - ROLFMAO!  MallRat   Sep-14-04 08:56 AM   #32 
  - A joint US-Saudi squadron with the same number? Oh, the irony!  Mary Pat   Sep-14-04 12:28 PM   #85 
  - The story has been scrubbed from the Moonie Times  unfrigginreal   Sep-14-04 08:54 AM   #30 
  - Here's a link  Walt Starr   Sep-14-04 08:59 AM   #33 
     - I still can't get that link to work  unfrigginreal   Sep-14-04 09:47 AM   #45 
  - You've convinced a lot of people ...  Onlooker   Sep-14-04 09:02 AM   #34 
  - Deleted message  Name removed   Sep-14-04 11:42 AM   #56 
  - You have not followed this story. The Air Force itself debunked that claim  Walt Starr   Sep-14-04 11:55 AM   #65 
  - Deleted message  Name removed   Sep-14-04 11:58 AM   #66 
     - Try search function  RetroLounge   Sep-14-04 12:28 PM   #84 
  - Welcome to DU DEMSTROYER  hexola   Sep-14-04 12:39 PM   #88 
     - DEMSTROYER is no longer with us  Walt Starr   Sep-14-04 12:41 PM   #90 
  - Your work on this is nothing short of admiralble  zwade   Sep-14-04 12:29 PM   #86 
  - If I were Walt...  grasswire   Sep-14-04 12:43 PM   #91 
  - Done! nt  hexola   Sep-14-04 01:31 PM   #101 
  - Walt, if he was discharged Oct. 1, 1973  nomatrix   Sep-14-04 02:16 PM   #102 
  - Those are dates of Reserve status  Walt Starr   Sep-14-04 02:32 PM   #103 
     - Thanks Walt,  nomatrix   Sep-14-04 02:42 PM   #107 
  - But Walt, the 3550th StudSq received the AFOUA for 3 Mar 69-15 Feb 71..  Walt Starr   Sep-14-04 02:34 PM   #104 
  - Good question, let's turn to the AFPC again  Walt Starr   Sep-14-04 02:34 PM   #105 
  - Holy Shit!  Vote_Clark_In_WI   Sep-14-04 04:27 PM   #110 
  - It's almost as if UPI were a rightwing news service owned by  Eric J in MN   Sep-14-04 05:19 PM   #112 
  - Once Again, The Bush White House Dodges With a Flat Out Lie.  David Zephyr   Sep-14-04 05:33 PM   #113 
     - The scandal-plagued president.  TacticalPeak   Sep-14-04 08:37 PM   #114 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC