You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #171: That disagrees with your interpretation of this thread. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-11-09 05:10 PM
Response to Reply #170
171. That disagrees with your interpretation of this thread.
They have posted here and have sent me private communications. Yes, believe it or not, I do know some gays on DU and many are not happy with the direction the board is taking. I know, I know, to say I am friends with can be perceived as patronizing but that is not my intention.

The majority of DUers support the GLBT community in every way possible, they just can't seem to make them happy on DU. It is unclear what they want. They can bash Obama all they like but that does not mean they are free from criticism and that their bashing will go unchallenged. It is a message board, if they want to post a message bashing Obama or another dem or a dem principle that goes without challenge then they should post it where others who do not share their views will read it.

There are many who have posted in this thread that have provided me with useful links that give me more avenues to pursue. They have told me what they are doing and have suggested things for me to do. While I appreciate all the links, the purpose of this thread is not to shut up the GLBT members, is not to try to make them stop speaking out, it was an effort to try to find someone to propose some action that all of DU can get behind as we have done in the past.

You post of issues beyond the purpose of this thread and others have read into it beyond its purpose.

I apparently have used words that some understand and others take offense to. Again, that is DU.

I've never claimed perfection and if you don't agree with my efforts that is okay too. What you read on DU is not all that I am and if there are those who post here think that DU defines them, then that is very sad indeed.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC