You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #7: Why? nt [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
Seen the light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-06-09 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Why? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -It would be unconstitutional for the Senate to seat Burris Freddie Stubbs  Jan-06-09 10:15 AM   #0 
  - Thanks Freddie for a the FACT update......we need more of it when it comes to this issue. n/t  rvablue   Jan-06-09 10:17 AM   #1 
  - Thanks for that  Bluzmann57   Jan-06-09 10:21 AM   #2 
  - It would be unconstitutional to seat Franken, too  IWantAnyDem   Jan-06-09 10:22 AM   #3 
     - so what is holding up Pawlenty, Franken won fair and square.  alyce douglas   Jan-06-09 10:35 AM   #8 
        - He cannot sign it under the law  IWantAnyDem   Jan-06-09 10:40 AM   #12 
           - so this falls on Coleman again, and to realize he has lost.  alyce douglas   Jan-06-09 10:50 AM   #14 
              - HE has a legal right to contest the election  IWantAnyDem   Jan-06-09 10:54 AM   #16 
  - It's time for our state legislature to direct an election for the seat  frazzled   Jan-06-09 10:31 AM   #4 
  - White needs to be tossed on the street.  Blarch   Jan-06-09 10:33 AM   #5 
  - Why? nt  Seen the light   Jan-06-09 10:34 AM   #7 
  - By law, he has to sign the certificate.  Blarch   Jan-06-09 10:37 AM   #9 
     - Until the ILSC rules he has to sign it, he doesn't have to sign anything  IWantAnyDem   Jan-06-09 10:39 AM   #11 
        - "a check on the appointment" ????  Blarch   Jan-06-09 10:57 AM   #17 
           - The statute is vague enough that this is what will be argued  IWantAnyDem   Jan-06-09 11:03 AM   #19 
  - No he doesn't "have to sign it"  IWantAnyDem   Jan-06-09 10:39 AM   #10 
  - Here is the rub, it was reported that Blagojevich has a number of generic certificates. . .  wndycty   Jan-06-09 10:41 AM   #13 
     - Link please  IWantAnyDem   Jan-06-09 10:53 AM   #15 
        - Yes he does, but since you don't believe me without a link I will attempt to find  wndycty   Jan-06-09 10:58 AM   #18 
           - Still working on the link (I messaged a reporter friend who will help) but it appears. . .  wndycty   Jan-06-09 11:12 AM   #20 
  - Which is why we have courts for that sort of thing  Hippo_Tron   Jan-06-09 10:12 PM   #22 
  - thanks for the information.  alyce douglas   Jan-06-09 10:34 AM   #6 
  - He has already stated that he will not certify anyone appointed by Blago  Freddie Stubbs   Jan-06-09 10:08 PM   #21 
     - The courts will probably say that he doesn't have the power not to sign it  Hippo_Tron   Jan-06-09 10:15 PM   #23 
  - Not really. The Senate could seat either Franken or Burris if it wished  tritsofme   Jan-06-09 11:37 PM   #24 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC