You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Reply #14: It's not a federal constituional "donnybrook" [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-09 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #6
14. It's not a federal constituional "donnybrook"
It's a matter for the state of Illinois and nobody else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
  -The Illinois State Senate should affirm Burrus. Perky  Jan-05-09 02:43 PM   #0 
  - Or...they spend 24 hours a day on Bogo's impeachment.  Democrats_win   Jan-05-09 02:48 PM   #1 
  - I am not sure they can convict him in the Senate  Perky   Jan-05-09 03:02 PM   #2 
  - It should only take about 5 minutes in the House.  ieoeja   Jan-05-09 03:18 PM   #5 
     - Umm you seem to forget rhe need for a trial  Perky   Jan-05-09 03:32 PM   #8 
        - And who sets the rules for that trial? The Senate.  ieoeja   Jan-05-09 03:36 PM   #9 
           - Um no....The State Constition sets therprocess not the State Senate,  Perky   Jan-05-09 03:43 PM   #11 
              - Since you seem determined to butt in to our business in Illinois....  ieoeja   Jan-05-09 04:05 PM   #15 
  - That would mean exactly nothing  IWantAnyDem   Jan-05-09 03:05 PM   #3 
  - The problem is that gov would be deemed subservient to the SOS  Perky   Jan-05-09 03:30 PM   #6 
     - It's not a federal constituional "donnybrook"  IWantAnyDem   Jan-05-09 03:58 PM   #14 
  - Hey, here's a better solution  IWantAnyDem   Jan-05-09 03:10 PM   #4 
  - Umm...that strains credulity  Perky   Jan-05-09 03:31 PM   #7 
     - Well, it's probably the only way Burris gets seated n/t  IWantAnyDem   Jan-05-09 03:47 PM   #12 
  - Seat and move on.  bigwillq   Jan-05-09 03:41 PM   #10 
  - Just sying the political cover cause a special election would be ruled unconstitutional.  Perky   Jan-05-09 03:48 PM   #13 
  - It is precisely because the process is tainted that Burris should NOT be confirmed.  AtomicKitten   Jan-05-09 04:07 PM   #16 
  - i think the point here is you can get rid of Blago  jacksonian   Jan-05-09 06:21 PM   #17 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC