You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #170: So you would have been fine... [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
jumptheshadow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 09:09 AM
Response to Reply #89
170. So you would have been fine...
if he had invited a preacher who didn't allow blacks or Asians into his church? How about native Americans? Is that group small enough for you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Obama is not going to pander to anyone nomad1776  Jan-03-09 03:33 PM   #0 
  - Warren speaking at the inauguration is pandering. Changing on DC gun ban, FISA, embargo on Cuba...  MookieWilson   Jan-03-09 03:34 PM   #1 
  - Yep - and also caving to the offshore drilling scam.  polichick   Jan-03-09 03:38 PM   #5 
  - Just Big Oil  Cronus Protagonist   Jan-03-09 03:41 PM   #11 
  - I CAN'T believe I forgot that one - THANKS! And I live on a coast!!  MookieWilson   Jan-03-09 03:48 PM   #16 
     - I grew up on the Gulf of Mexico so that one freaks me out too!  polichick   Jan-03-09 03:50 PM   #18 
        - I lived in the FLKeys, Va. Beach and Newport, RI. Damn - that one made me angry!!  MookieWilson   Jan-03-09 03:52 PM   #20 
  - Actually none of what you have listed is pandering......  FrenchieCat   Jan-03-09 03:38 PM   #6 
  - Nomad1776 and Frenchie Cat - Get a room!!!  MookieWilson   Jan-03-09 04:00 PM   #26 
  - Why?  FrenchieCat   Jan-03-09 04:03 PM   #32 
  - I guess you agree with us, since you are unable to offer up anything  nomad1776   Jan-03-09 04:04 PM   #33 
  - no...please....they could spawn!  FarceOfNature   Jan-03-09 05:52 PM   #103 
  - Some of you are just annoying  Wolsh   Jan-04-09 11:04 PM   #231 
  - what, did frenchie step into the middle of your obama bashing or something?  dionysus   Jan-03-09 09:43 PM   #153 
  - What *Is* the Warren Invite Then if Not Pandering to Xtian Wackjobs?  AndyTiedye   Jan-03-09 04:05 PM   #34 
  - I see the Warren pick as pandering  Irvinwalker   Jan-03-09 04:39 PM   #71 
  - Welcome to DU!  yardwork   Jan-03-09 05:09 PM   #88 
  - Lack of pandering? LOL!  yardwork   Jan-03-09 05:08 PM   #87 
  - The majority support these positions, so how would it be pandering?  nomad1776   Jan-03-09 03:58 PM   #22 
  - The majority support a flag burning amendment. Was Hillary pandering? I'd say yes.  Kurt_and_Hunter   Jan-03-09 04:06 PM   #37 
  - The majority believed the drilling scam - Obama knew better...  polichick   Jan-03-09 04:17 PM   #47 
  - Pandering has nothing to do with the majority....  Luminous Animal   Jan-03-09 04:38 PM   #69 
     - Unity and efforts to get along, are not "baser weaknesses"  nomad1776   Jan-03-09 04:41 PM   #73 
        - You made the claim that Obama isn't going to "pander".  Luminous Animal   Jan-03-09 04:44 PM   #75 
           - I don't agree with that assessment, nor do I think it's a reasonable alternative  nomad1776   Jan-03-09 04:51 PM   #76 
              - You can make up your own definitions...  Luminous Animal   Jan-03-09 05:01 PM   #83 
  - some pandering is more equal than others...  TankLV   Jan-03-09 04:19 PM   #51 
  - Awgeeze.  lamp_shade   Jan-03-09 04:53 PM   #77 
  - Wall St Bailout.  bvar22   Jan-03-09 06:44 PM   #114 
  - Oh we all know this already.  Simply Fugue   Jan-03-09 03:34 PM   #2 
  - Yes! Our nation is in too big of mess to play any pandering games  nomad1776   Jan-03-09 03:47 PM   #15 
  - LOL - Obama is pandering BIG TIME with this Warren invite...  polichick   Jan-03-09 03:35 PM   #3 
  - Just the Christian "Right"  Cronus Protagonist   Jan-03-09 03:40 PM   #10 
  - The majority of the nation doesn't have a problem with this choice  nomad1776   Jan-03-09 04:00 PM   #25 
     - You don't understand what pandering is. nt  MookieWilson   Jan-03-09 04:03 PM   #31 
     - panderer n.  Voice for Peace   Jan-03-09 04:30 PM   #62 
        - "caters to the vulgar passions"  depakid   Jan-03-09 08:26 PM   #148 
           - You're asking me to THINK?  Voice for Peace   Jan-03-09 09:54 PM   #154 
     - So, because he panders to the majority, that's not "pandering"?  donco6   Jan-04-09 10:45 AM   #186 
     - The majority of the nation doesn't pay that much attention  dflprincess   Jan-04-09 08:43 PM   #227 
  - Just Israel  Cronus Protagonist   Jan-03-09 03:37 PM   #4 
  - He hasn't spoken on this issue, since he is not president  nomad1776   Jan-03-09 04:00 PM   #27 
     - His lack of comment speaks volumes. He's talked about everything else since he was elected. Except  chimpymustgo   Jan-04-09 08:15 AM   #167 
  - .  sniffa   Jan-03-09 03:39 PM   #7 
  - LOL...funniest political comment ever.  Forkboy   Jan-03-09 03:39 PM   #8 
  - Governing to the left("his perceived base") would be in the best interest of the nation!! n/t  retread   Jan-03-09 03:40 PM   #9 
  - Well, only if you consider the Constitution and the survival of the planet. ;)  polichick   Jan-03-09 03:44 PM   #12 
  - 17 days left before any Governing happens......  FrenchieCat   Jan-03-09 03:44 PM   #13 
  - Deleted message  Name removed   Jan-03-09 04:00 PM   #24 
  - He was NEVER the liberal people here thought he was/is. nt  MookieWilson   Jan-03-09 03:51 PM   #19 
  - He isn't going to govern on an idealogical basis, he is too intelligent  nomad1776   Jan-03-09 04:02 PM   #30 
     - Thats the part that scares me.  bvar22   Jan-03-09 06:54 PM   #117 
     - Check out his pick for DNC chair  dflprincess   Jan-04-09 08:47 PM   #228 
  - Obama is a perfect human being  NWHarkness   Jan-03-09 03:46 PM   #14 
  - Oh, yeah - I forgot! Ooops! Thanks for the reminder!  MookieWilson   Jan-03-09 03:50 PM   #17 
  - Well I guess there is always the intellectual dishonest reply  nomad1776   Jan-03-09 03:59 PM   #23 
  - Why do you think you deserve an intellectually honest reply?  NWHarkness   Jan-03-09 04:05 PM   #35 
     - You demonstrate the point that most people that do wrong  nomad1776   Jan-03-09 04:18 PM   #48 
     - Oops, I forgot to put "wrong doer" on my list!  NWHarkness   Jan-03-09 04:27 PM   #58 
     - Lots Of Hubris In That Poster Dear NWHark  Binka   Jan-03-09 07:11 PM   #120 
  - The point is that Obama isn't perfect, nor does anyone think that he is.....  FrenchieCat   Jan-03-09 04:02 PM   #29 
  - Are you sure about that?  NWHarkness   Jan-03-09 04:09 PM   #40 
     - Well, the important thing is that he doesn't believe himself to be perfect.....  FrenchieCat   Jan-03-09 04:23 PM   #54 
        - "criticizing his every move"  NWHarkness   Jan-03-09 04:30 PM   #61 
           - I'm a grown up and understand the fact long ago that not everyone will agree with Obama  FrenchieCat   Jan-03-09 04:44 PM   #74 
  - thanks for the "reminder" about "saint" obama...  TankLV   Jan-03-09 04:22 PM   #52 
     - See what I mean?  FrenchieCat   Jan-03-09 04:25 PM   #56 
  - .;..and where right-wing religious beliefs align with his Messianic cause  AntiFascist   Jan-03-09 03:53 PM   #21 
  - he will pander and is pandering. he just wont do it for equality and civil rights. nt  lionesspriyanka   Jan-03-09 04:01 PM   #28 
  - you base this comment on his constant attacks on pandering?  nomad1776   Jan-03-09 04:05 PM   #36 
  - Do you even know what the word "pander" means?  Luminous Animal   Jan-03-09 04:13 PM   #44 
     - There must be some artsy phrase generator somewhere on the internets.  Bluebear   Jan-03-09 04:19 PM   #50 
     - Not really, all you managed was gibberish  nomad1776   Jan-03-09 04:23 PM   #53 
        - That's the point, and inspired by your fancy ramblings.  Bluebear   Jan-03-09 04:24 PM   #55 
           - So your point is I should dumb down my responses, so you can understand them?  nomad1776   Jan-03-09 04:27 PM   #57 
              - No, the point is you don't even know when you're being insulted.  Bluebear   Jan-03-09 04:29 PM   #59 
                 - So you are saying you attempted to insult me?  nomad1776   Jan-03-09 04:32 PM   #65 
                 - So you are saying you attempted to insult me?  nomad1776   Jan-03-09 04:32 PM   #66 
                    - pffff are you ever tiresome. go alert that you were insulted lol  Bluebear   Jan-03-09 04:33 PM   #67 
                    - I'm sorry was I supposed to get all fired up by your attempted insults  nomad1776   Jan-03-09 04:38 PM   #70 
                    - Your OP of this thread aside...  JohnnieGordon   Jan-03-09 07:42 PM   #142 
                    - Stop clicking on "SEND" over and over again  sheeptramp   Jan-04-09 11:02 PM   #230 
     - Ultimately he is not going to pander to any group that says large portions of law abiding  nomad1776   Jan-03-09 04:30 PM   #60 
        - Jim Crow was the law, too.  Luminous Animal   Jan-03-09 04:55 PM   #79 
  - Right, because the future has already happened......  FrenchieCat   Jan-03-09 04:06 PM   #38 
     - he is against gay marriage which is a very big symbol of equality. nt  lionesspriyanka   Jan-03-09 04:08 PM   #39 
        - And is this a surprise?  FrenchieCat   Jan-03-09 04:12 PM   #42 
           - 'as did all candidates with any chance of winning' = pandering  Bluebear   Jan-03-09 04:13 PM   #43 
           - Who said that they don't hold that view?  FrenchieCat   Jan-03-09 04:16 PM   #45 
              - Oops, you used a shruggie smiley, Game over, you win.  Bluebear   Jan-03-09 04:17 PM   #46 
                 - Yeah....right! Using a shrug smiley is as easy as predicting the future for the next four years,  FrenchieCat   Jan-03-09 04:32 PM   #64 
           - NOT a surpise. However to say he doesnt pander or will not pander is such bullshit.  lionesspriyanka   Jan-03-09 04:18 PM   #49 
           - Actually he said it in a different way...  AntiFascist   Jan-03-09 05:46 PM   #102 
  - And pandas don't eat bamboo.  rug   Jan-03-09 04:09 PM   #41 
  - What even *more* need  pecwae   Jan-03-09 04:32 PM   #63 
  - lol  redstate_democrat   Jan-03-09 04:34 PM   #68 
  - Well with that many laugh emoticons, what you say just HAS to be true  nomad1776   Jan-03-09 04:40 PM   #72 
     - Your sarcasm tag is showing.  redstate_democrat   Jan-03-09 05:00 PM   #82 
  - Hear! Hear! Which is why he is the Pres. Elect. People who have  Tarheel_Dem   Jan-03-09 04:54 PM   #78 
  - gay rights is such a special interest group.  lionesspriyanka   Jan-03-09 04:56 PM   #80 
  - If it's not a special interest group (of which I approve), then what is it?  Tarheel_Dem   Jan-03-09 05:00 PM   #81 
  - civil rights should not be derided as a special interests group, its an equal rights movement  lionesspriyanka   Jan-03-09 05:01 PM   #84 
  - Yes I do. As well as the Pacific Asian Caucus, the Hispanic Caucus, etc.  Tarheel_Dem   Jan-03-09 05:15 PM   #89 
  - So you would have been fine...  jumptheshadow   Jan-04-09 09:09 AM   #170 
  - lioness -- check your PMs  Lex   Jan-03-09 05:20 PM   #92 
  - There is a deliberate mixing up of interest groups and human rights  nomad1776   Jan-03-09 06:44 PM   #113 
     - What special interst group are you referring to now?  bluedawg12   Jan-03-09 07:33 PM   #140 
  - LOL! You think that all gay people are organized into one group represented by lobbyists?  yardwork   Jan-03-09 05:07 PM   #86 
  - Actually, the Human Rights Campaign  Shiver   Jan-03-09 08:04 PM   #146 
  - Tell me, what makes gay civil rights more special  Luminous Animal   Jan-03-09 05:17 PM   #90 
     - Deleted sub-thread  Name removed   Jan-03-09 05:25 PM   #93 
     - What rights are straight white men lacking? n/t  donco6   Jan-03-09 10:05 PM   #157 
  - The OP is saying the same thing as the far right  jumptheshadow   Jan-04-09 11:20 AM   #200 
     - yeah i know. it was such a stupid argument i didnt want to waste my time on it  lionesspriyanka   Jan-04-09 11:28 AM   #202 
  - Human rights are not a "special interest". (n/t)  Luminous Animal   Jan-03-09 05:04 PM   #85 
  - There is a deliberate mixing up of interest groups and human rights  nomad1776   Jan-03-09 06:42 PM   #111 
  - It is my strong belief that the government has to treat all citizens equally.  bluedawg12   Jan-03-09 05:33 PM   #97 
  - Are you KIDDING? That's almost all he does.  PurityOfEssence   Jan-03-09 05:19 PM   #91 
  - You are correct in that Obama is not an idealogue.......  FrenchieCat   Jan-03-09 05:25 PM   #94 
     - No, he's not. He seems well-meaning, but he's a true cipher.  PurityOfEssence   Jan-03-09 06:17 PM   #106 
        - No offense...  TTUBatfan2008   Jan-03-09 08:12 PM   #147 
        - Let's take a look at that  PurityOfEssence   Jan-03-09 10:14 PM   #159 
        - " Coziness with Medicine Incorporated"  depakid   Jan-03-09 08:41 PM   #149 
        - Best post I've read in a long time.  burythehatchet   Jan-04-09 08:04 AM   #165 
        - Good post  donco6   Jan-04-09 11:53 AM   #205 
  - Virtually every cabinet pick, with one or two exceptions, has been pandering if you ask me.  salguine   Jan-03-09 05:28 PM   #95 
  - Well, apparently he has "pandered" to the satisfaction of most of America.  Tarheel_Dem   Jan-03-09 06:44 PM   #112 
     - and thank goodness the mob is so well informed.  burythehatchet   Jan-04-09 08:07 AM   #166 
     - Well that would be the point would it not?  Raineyb   Jan-05-09 11:29 AM   #235 
  - Recommended. And anyone who was listening KNOWS THIS.  NYC_SKP   Jan-03-09 05:33 PM   #96 
  - Thank you NYC.  Tarheel_Dem   Jan-03-09 06:14 PM   #104 
     - All the usual suspects....  NYC_SKP   Jan-03-09 07:00 PM   #118 
        - I Have Not Been In This Dust Up  Binka   Jan-03-09 07:29 PM   #136 
           - .  NYC_SKP   Jan-03-09 07:32 PM   #139 
  - All politicians pander. Obama is no exception.  Inspired   Jan-03-09 05:33 PM   #98 
  - correct  Skittles   Jan-03-09 06:35 PM   #107 
  - Well Dammit!  sheeptramp   Jan-04-09 11:17 PM   #232 
  - Pandering to the Christian Right already.  mycritters2   Jan-03-09 05:36 PM   #99 
  - I think there is an enormous danger  bluedawg12   Jan-03-09 05:38 PM   #100 
  - He is already pandering to the Religious Right and the DLC  Liberal_Stalwart71   Jan-03-09 05:46 PM   #101 
  - Please repair the incoherent syntax in your OP.  FarceOfNature   Jan-03-09 06:15 PM   #105 
  - You don't like ponies? nt  mycritters2   Jan-03-09 06:36 PM   #108 
  - well you certainly managed to waste everyone's time with this post  nomad1776   Jan-03-09 06:41 PM   #109 
  - You're a one trick pony.  FarceOfNature   Jan-03-09 06:45 PM   #115 
     - What exactly qualifies you to "teach" anyone??????  nomad1776   Jan-03-09 06:51 PM   #116 
        - ahhh projection!  FarceOfNature   Jan-03-09 07:13 PM   #121 
           - More than one person here bought that "deep thought" seat!  Bluebear   Jan-03-09 07:14 PM   #122 
           - Hey didn't say you were leaving, after you were embarrassed badly?  nomad1776   Jan-03-09 07:17 PM   #124 
           - Well, no I didn't. Go babble at someone else.  Bluebear   Jan-03-09 07:18 PM   #126 
              - Yes you did, on post 67  nomad1776   Jan-03-09 07:22 PM   #131 
                 - You sound like a Bill O'Reilly wannabe. You really do.  Bluebear   Jan-03-09 07:25 PM   #133 
                    - That's the best you can come up with?  nomad1776   Jan-03-09 07:29 PM   #135 
                       - Deleted message  Name removed   Jan-03-09 07:30 PM   #137 
                          - you're in good company, though!  FarceOfNature   Jan-03-09 07:43 PM   #143 
                             - No kidding. n/t  donco6   Jan-04-09 11:08 AM   #194 
           - hahahaha Bluebear!  FarceOfNature   Jan-03-09 07:20 PM   #129 
           - Is the laughing icon your qualifications?  nomad1776   Jan-03-09 07:17 PM   #123 
              - "While that might be enough for lesser minds, I require more than that."- talk about EGO!  Bluebear   Jan-03-09 07:19 PM   #127 
              - Well, we could start with the fact that my grasp of the English language exceeds yours.  FarceOfNature   Jan-03-09 07:19 PM   #128 
                 - Well I find there are too many DUers to respond to all of them  nomad1776   Jan-03-09 07:27 PM   #134 
                    - hahahaha you can't be serious! Oh, you ARE?  FarceOfNature   Jan-03-09 07:39 PM   #141 
                    - OMG...talk about delusions of grandeur!  Bluebear   Jan-03-09 09:21 PM   #151 
                    - Now THAT'S how you do condescension.  donco6   Jan-03-09 10:10 PM   #158 
                       - Yeah I gave ignored a taste of their own medicine  nomad1776   Jan-04-09 09:10 AM   #171 
                          - Or childish tit-for-tatism.  donco6   Jan-04-09 09:37 AM   #177 
                             - Just you, I saw your deleted message  nomad1776   Jan-04-09 10:25 AM   #179 
                                - I haven't had a deleted message that I know of.  donco6   Jan-04-09 10:33 AM   #181 
                                   - Post 161- seeing how you are all over this thread  nomad1776   Jan-04-09 10:59 AM   #188 
                                      - Well, if it was me, it must have been really good.  donco6   Jan-04-09 11:11 AM   #195 
  - Will wake you up in 8 years......  FrenchieCat   Jan-03-09 06:41 PM   #110 
  - He'll be accused of it anyway. It's a stock rationalization for some.  AtomicKitten   Jan-03-09 07:02 PM   #119 
  - Yes clearly that is the case  nomad1776   Jan-03-09 07:18 PM   #125 
  - -  YeOldeBostonEarl   Jan-04-09 07:38 PM   #225 
  - If that is true, whether I like what he is doing or not, then I can live with that. I think we  IsItJustMe   Jan-03-09 07:20 PM   #130 
  - Can't be any worse than what George Bush has done  nomad1776   Jan-03-09 07:23 PM   #132 
     - Sad to say, but I think there forces at work in this country that even outweight the power of the  IsItJustMe   Jan-03-09 10:00 PM   #156 
  - I guess that you haven't followed his senate career or the presidential campaign...  depakid   Jan-03-09 07:31 PM   #138 
  - I think we know he will not pander to racists....now other bigots, well...nt.  IndianaJones   Jan-03-09 07:45 PM   #144 
  - But they aren't really bigots, after all.  yardwork   Jan-03-09 07:55 PM   #145 
  - I was appalled that he voted for FISA; that really threw me.  MasonJar   Jan-03-09 08:50 PM   #150 
  - Me too. And he turned on the DC Gun Ban and used NRA language to describe...  MookieWilson   Jan-03-09 09:43 PM   #152 
  - He's a politician who doesn't pander? n/t  cynatnite   Jan-03-09 09:56 PM   #155 
  - Oh geez. You just don't quit  Lorien   Jan-03-09 10:27 PM   #160 
  - Deleted message  Name removed   Jan-03-09 11:06 PM   #161 
  - Why should I quit?  nomad1776   Jan-04-09 09:00 AM   #169 
  - Nonsense  Everybody   Jan-04-09 07:44 AM   #162 
  - Unless He's "Pandering" to Rick Warren  From The Left   Jan-04-09 07:52 AM   #163 
  - President Elect Obama is not pandering, which is why he wouldn't cave  nomad1776   Jan-04-09 09:20 AM   #175 
     - So, you're saying . . .  donco6   Jan-04-09 10:36 AM   #183 
     - Oh those poor persecuted religious people, cry me a river, please...  Solon   Jan-05-09 03:12 AM   #234 
  - He only panders to the right  burythehatchet   Jan-04-09 07:59 AM   #164 
  - That's what special interests complain about, when they don't get the  nomad1776   Jan-04-09 09:18 AM   #173 
     - Since when did gays become "special interest"?  donco6   Jan-04-09 10:43 AM   #185 
  - How you can say this with a straight face is beyond me  MadHound   Jan-04-09 08:16 AM   #168 
  - What you call pandering, the vast majority of liberals and the nation  nomad1776   Jan-04-09 09:17 AM   #172 
     - The majority of the nation favors prayer in public schools. Is that a good idea?  Kurt_and_Hunter   Jan-04-09 09:20 AM   #174 
        - School prayer is a rather complex issue and the wording on those polls  nomad1776   Jan-04-09 09:30 AM   #176 
  - Disagree.  area51   Jan-04-09 10:03 AM   #178 
  - What proof do you offer? I mean what do you base your assumption  nomad1776   Jan-04-09 10:27 AM   #180 
     - He DOESN'T think a single-payer would be best.  donco6   Jan-04-09 10:34 AM   #182 
     - Nope, if he doesn't think it's best, than he is not pandering by not supporting it  nomad1776   Jan-04-09 10:43 AM   #184 
        - He's obviously pandering to the status quo.  donco6   Jan-04-09 10:50 AM   #187 
           - That was an odd and illogical statement  nomad1776   Jan-04-09 10:59 AM   #189 
              - Not at all.  donco6   Jan-04-09 11:03 AM   #190 
                 - It's a simple idea built on a foundation of quick sand  nomad1776   Jan-04-09 11:06 AM   #191 
                    - Oh. I see.  donco6   Jan-04-09 11:07 AM   #193 
                       - You love to disagree for the sake of disagreeing  nomad1776   Jan-04-09 11:14 AM   #197 
                          - C-ya. n/t  donco6   Jan-04-09 11:16 AM   #198 
                             - He's such a tool  sniffa   Jan-04-09 12:46 PM   #214 
                                - GAWD! No effing kidding.  donco6   Jan-04-09 12:54 PM   #216 
                                   - It's not worth it  sniffa   Jan-04-09 01:12 PM   #218 
     - He certainly supports it in principle, but says it would only work if starting from scratch.  OMomma   Jan-05-09 12:38 AM   #233 
  - If by pandering you mean 'keeping his campaign promises' you're right.  acmavm   Jan-04-09 11:07 AM   #192 
  - ha ha ha!  leftofthedial   Jan-04-09 11:12 AM   #196 
  - guess you are one of the people that are pissed off that he didn't pander to you  nomad1776   Jan-04-09 11:16 AM   #199 
     - I never expected him to pander to me.  leftofthedial   Jan-04-09 11:26 AM   #201 
        - But . . .but . . . Obama CAN'T be a panderer!  donco6   Jan-04-09 11:31 AM   #204 
        - Glad to see you are waiting until he is President before passing judgment  nomad1776   Jan-04-09 12:05 PM   #206 
           - Why should I (or anyone) wait until some arbitrary date of your choosing?  leftofthedial   Jan-04-09 12:21 PM   #208 
              - Yes if you don't rush to judgment you will have the crowds of reasonable people to deal with  nomad1776   Jan-04-09 12:26 PM   #209 
                 - "rush to judgment"?  leftofthedial   Jan-04-09 12:34 PM   #210 
                    - lol! yeah that must be it  nomad1776   Jan-04-09 12:39 PM   #211 
                       - not anyone.  leftofthedial   Jan-04-09 12:42 PM   #212 
                          - judging by your close minded view of the world  nomad1776   Jan-04-09 12:44 PM   #213 
                             - Why do you care? Why bother posting responses to me?  leftofthedial   Jan-04-09 12:53 PM   #215 
                                - Well I like to keep an open mind. So I gave you a chance to lay out a reasoned argument  nomad1776   Jan-04-09 01:03 PM   #217 
                                   - delete  donco6   Jan-04-09 01:15 PM   #219 
  - Why would he quit pandering?  cosmik debris   Jan-04-09 11:29 AM   #203 
  - He definitely panders, and if you don't think so you are really drinking the kool-aid BUT...  cbc5g   Jan-04-09 12:11 PM   #207 
  - Of course he will  varelse   Jan-04-09 01:37 PM   #220 
  - That kind of support for pandering wasn't present when Hillary "pandered"  danania   Jan-04-09 06:10 PM   #221 
     - I accept that pandering is part of politics  varelse   Jan-04-09 07:00 PM   #224 
  - do you ever fucking stop?  sundog   Jan-04-09 06:36 PM   #222 
  - Answer: no.  Bluebear   Jan-04-09 06:42 PM   #223 
     - it's becoming more & more obvious that this poster's primary objective  sundog   Jan-04-09 08:38 PM   #226 
  - Are you saying we will be ignored as usual?  mmonk   Jan-04-09 09:32 PM   #229 
  - Pandering to any size of a majority is a mistake  nolabels   Jan-05-09 11:47 AM   #236 
  - And what do you call the Saddleback Church and its Fuehrer Rick Warren?  IndianaGreen   Jan-05-09 01:39 PM   #237 
  - Yeah, the cold shoulder he's been giving the DLC hacks has been a sight  Skwmom   Jan-05-09 01:53 PM   #238 
  - Yeah, the cold shoulder he's been giving the DLC hacks has been a sight  Skwmom   Jan-05-09 01:53 PM   #239 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC