You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #75: You're right [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread		 This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
Nederland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-04 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #74
75. You're right
I'm begining to believe this whole thing will blow up in our faces.

People around here have been centering solely on the earliest points about proportional spacing and superscipts and how they have been debunked. Meanwhile, the conservative blog community has proceeded to debunk the debunking, addressing ever point we've raised. For example, there now is incontrovertable proof that an IBM Composer could not have produced the CBS documents because there are only 7 possible portional font widths and the CBS document cannot be reproduced using only them. I'm afraid people around here just watch CBS defend its position, cheered and moved on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -CBS Bush documents NOT fake! Eye See You  Sep-12-04 06:20 PM   #0 
  - "superscript" and "proportional spacing" began in 1941.  papau   Sep-12-04 06:35 PM   #1 
  - Any specifics re: "including the raised th via the extra key one purchase  troublemaker   Sep-12-04 07:14 PM   #10 
     - Many typewriters of that era could be set to half space  Cleita   Sep-12-04 07:23 PM   #16 
     - this is precisely the problem with this whole deal  troublemaker   Sep-12-04 07:42 PM   #23 
     - 'official' records th same width as new docs  phish420   Sep-12-04 09:22 PM   #42 
     - The "Roman" ball was 3rd party as I recall - the key purchase is for the  papau   Sep-13-04 07:50 AM   #59 
        - No it can't  Nederland   Sep-13-04 03:33 PM   #76 
           - How can you possible tell?  yardwork   Sep-13-04 03:47 PM   #78 
              - Kerning  Nederland   Sep-13-04 03:51 PM   #79 
  - All good points  joefree1   Sep-12-04 06:38 PM   #2 
  - Your link doesn't work and the Typewriter was an  BeatleBoot   Sep-12-04 06:39 PM   #3 
  - cbs reported this AM - on TV or what?  pinkpops   Sep-12-04 07:06 PM   #7 
  - The link works - take off the trailing comma in address bar...n/t  phish420   Sep-12-04 09:24 PM   #43 
  - I'm beginning to see this as a loser issue.  robcon   Sep-12-04 06:48 PM   #4 
  - Deleted message  Name removed   Sep-12-04 07:01 PM   #5 
  - OOOHH look at this another REPUKE TALKING POINT POST!  AmerDem   Sep-12-04 07:22 PM   #15 
  - LOL  Cheswick   Sep-12-04 08:11 PM   #28 
  - Do you have a link?  alarcoeg   Sep-12-04 09:06 PM   #40 
  - Whats wrong with you?  saracat   Sep-12-04 07:03 PM   #6 
  - Notice that neither of the anti-Rather posters offered any evidence.  spooky3   Sep-12-04 07:06 PM   #8 
  - Deleted message  Name removed   Sep-12-04 07:25 PM   #18 
     - I smell a rat.  abrock   Sep-12-04 07:29 PM   #20 
     - Deleted message  Name removed   Sep-12-04 07:31 PM   #21 
     - I actually ttied that.  girl gone mad   Sep-12-04 08:17 PM   #30 
     - don't expect it  AmerDem   Sep-12-04 08:24 PM   #33 
     - They say they compared with Word but...  LiberalFighter   Sep-12-04 10:02 PM   #47 
     - The match is NOT perfect  demwing2   Sep-12-04 08:27 PM   #34 
     - What I'm saying is that..  girl gone mad   Sep-12-04 10:47 PM   #49 
     - Thats cool GGM, I was actually responding to the freep  demwing2   Sep-12-04 11:57 PM   #54 
        - I know you were..  girl gone mad   Sep-13-04 12:21 AM   #55 
     - Here's what I got when I tried to reproduce the document..  girl gone mad   Sep-12-04 11:01 PM   #53 
     - Perhaps you can show us?  gatorboy   Sep-12-04 09:08 PM   #41 
        - Deleted message  Name removed   Sep-12-04 10:42 PM   #48 
  - I think a Killian mistress produced the documents  rosebud57   Sep-12-04 07:07 PM   #9 
  - Huh? What does the FACT of whether the documents are fake...  robcon   Sep-12-04 07:40 PM   #22 
  - only upside is that casual viewers keep hearing "Bush service record" and  troublemaker   Sep-12-04 07:17 PM   #11 
  - Deleted message  Name removed   Sep-12-04 07:25 PM   #17 
     - Deleted message  Name removed   Sep-12-04 07:48 PM   #25 
        - Stop whining  Iceburg   Sep-12-04 09:00 PM   #39 
           - Deleted message  Name removed   Sep-12-04 09:49 PM   #45 
  - I'm begining to see a LOSER!  AmerDem   Sep-12-04 07:26 PM   #19 
  - yeah, so?  Cheswick   Sep-12-04 08:09 PM   #27 
  - Why would they have to admit the papers are a forgery?  Moonbeam_Starlight   Sep-12-04 10:50 PM   #50 
  - What are you reading? - major media has caved - CBS wins  papau   Sep-13-04 07:54 AM   #60 
  - What have your read?  goodhue   Sep-13-04 08:14 AM   #61 
  - you noticed huh  Snivi Yllom   Sep-13-04 01:11 PM   #67 
  - You are correct  vadood   Sep-13-04 01:59 PM   #71 
  - Superscripts ... how to from the IBM Selectric Manual  Iceburg   Sep-12-04 07:19 PM   #12 
  - All true, but not useful to answer the actual question involved  troublemaker   Sep-12-04 08:01 PM   #26 
     - Exactly  Nederland   Sep-13-04 01:19 PM   #68 
  - Wow...  Hepburn   Sep-12-04 07:20 PM   #13 
  - None of this matters: If whores say they're fake, they might as well be.  John_H   Sep-12-04 07:21 PM   #14 
  - I beg to differ ... I checked about 20 local (on-line) papers  Iceburg   Sep-12-04 07:47 PM   #24 
  - Those do not look like good reports  Generic Other   Sep-12-04 09:37 PM   #44 
  - This is a winning issue  Cheswick   Sep-12-04 08:16 PM   #29 
  - Serious question: Did the Executive model D have a "th" special character?  troublemaker   Sep-12-04 08:24 PM   #32 
  - Buck Up! Don't be a defeatist!  zidzi   Sep-12-04 08:32 PM   #35 
  - Please check out..  girl gone mad   Sep-12-04 08:21 PM   #31 
  - Thanks for this...I've been going back  zidzi   Sep-12-04 08:39 PM   #38 
  - Thank you! I saw Dan Rather asserting that the documents were authentic,  Rhiannon12866   Sep-12-04 08:36 PM   #36 
  - Time Mag: The X Files Of Lt. Bush  Iceburg   Sep-12-04 08:36 PM   #37 
  - Sweet!  crickets   Sep-13-04 02:16 PM   #72 
  - Kerry needs to thank the bushbots across the country  Bimini_Twisted   Sep-12-04 10:00 PM   #46 
  - This hoax that "superscript" and "proportional spacing" was not available  goodhue   Sep-12-04 10:51 PM   #51 
  - Deleted message  Name removed   Sep-12-04 10:52 PM   #52 
  - Thanks! This is a great post! I appreciate all the info and the links  Rhiannon12866   Sep-13-04 02:17 AM   #56 
  - kickin  meany   Sep-13-04 05:28 AM   #57 
  - Bush Worshippers Professional Liars Club. dandy name.  oasis   Sep-13-04 05:32 AM   #58 
  - Look at this...  girl gone mad   Sep-13-04 08:51 AM   #62 
  - Guess what?  girl gone mad   Sep-13-04 09:17 AM   #63 
     - Great work. "Another freeper argument blown out of the water".  oasis   Sep-13-04 01:07 PM   #65 
     - Err, folks  Jonathan Little   Sep-13-04 01:23 PM   #69 
        - No its not  Nederland   Sep-13-04 02:20 PM   #73 
           - Girl gone mad's screenshot is  Jonathan Little   Sep-13-04 02:48 PM   #74 
              - You're right  Nederland   Sep-13-04 03:31 PM   #75 
  - Found some very similar text from 1962  starroute   Sep-13-04 11:33 AM   #64 
  - Wow. Typewritten JUSTIFIED text from 1964.  OilemFirchen   Sep-13-04 01:30 PM   #70 
  - Thanks for defining our message for us New Comer  Must_B_Free   Sep-13-04 01:10 PM   #66 
  - It is so easy to prove the genuineness of these docs  AngryAmish   Sep-13-04 03:43 PM   #77 
  - kick  ArnoldLayne   Sep-13-04 04:12 PM   #80 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC