Donate to DU!
Democratic Underground Latest Threads
Latest
Greatest Threads
Greatest
Lobby
Lobby
Journals
Journals
Search
Search
Options
Options
Help
Help
Login
Login
Google

Reply #13: It's an appointment, actually. If memory serves, the state party... [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
First thread | Last thread
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
Smarmie Doofus Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Mon Dec-15-08 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. It's an appointment, actually. If memory serves, the state party...
... cleared the field for Clinton in 2000 so that there would be no primary fight. In effect, appointing her as the candidate.

Yes, it's true she then had to run against a republican. But the arguments against Kennedy would pretty much apply across the board to Clinton.

And ... there's one HUGE difference: Kennedy is a legit New Yorker. Clinton was a transplant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  29 (D) state senators in New York.... none of 'em are Caroline Kennedy. boppers  Dec-15-08 10:13 PM   #0 
   as if that matters  TexasObserver   Dec-15-08 10:15 PM   #1 
   brush it off  tabatha   Dec-15-08 10:15 PM   #2 
   The same logic would have held true for Hillary. No? nt  PaulHo   Dec-15-08 10:15 PM   #3 
   a vote and a nomination are a little different. i dont mind caroline kennedy  lionesspriyanka   Dec-15-08 10:17 PM   #7 
   It's an appointment, actually. If memory serves, the state party...  PaulHo   Dec-15-08 10:33 PM   #13 
      Kennedy was actually voted upon, even if it was an easy election and a weak candidate.  boppers   Dec-15-08 11:57 PM   #28 
   Or RFK.  jobycom   Dec-15-08 10:22 PM   #11 
   Hillary actually had people vote for her.  boppers   Dec-15-08 10:39 PM   #15 
      And all those people you listed didn't win a state-wide election.  Drunken Irishman   Dec-15-08 10:50 PM   #20 
         You are correct.  boppers   Dec-15-08 11:03 PM   #24 
         Winning an election does not mean you're better suited for the job.  Drunken Irishman   Dec-16-08 03:33 AM   #51 
         And Kennedy hasn't won any election.  gmudem   Dec-16-08 12:19 AM   #31 
            She has served your state.  Drunken Irishman   Dec-16-08 03:35 AM   #52 
               Do you think she would have a chance at getting appointed  gmudem   Dec-16-08 04:54 PM   #64 
   29 people who would STILL be rookies in the US Senate  DJ13   Dec-15-08 10:16 PM   #4 
   They'd be rookies in the US senate, yes.  boppers   Dec-15-08 10:35 PM   #14 
   That would be fine with me.  Beacool   Dec-16-08 12:41 AM   #44 
   No thank you. I'm delighted by the idea of the getting HRC  RhodaGrits   Dec-16-08 09:37 AM   #56 
   Any who are statewide known?  FrenchieCat   Dec-15-08 10:16 PM   #5 
   And...????  Rabrrrrrr   Dec-15-08 10:16 PM   #6 
   I live in NY, and I would vote for Caroline Kennedy.  BrklynLiberal   Dec-15-08 10:18 PM   #8 
   30 Helens agree.  AtomicKitten   Dec-15-08 10:20 PM   #9 
   I'm gonna have to consult the "Daves I know" on this, and get back to y'all!  dicksteele   Dec-16-08 12:36 AM   #41 
   Such silliness.  Old Crusoe   Dec-15-08 10:22 PM   #10 
   I doubt all 29 are good and qualified  Jake3463   Dec-15-08 10:27 PM   #12 
   You are correct.  Bleachers7   Dec-15-08 10:45 PM   #18 
   When you have 29 of anything, some of it will likely suck ass.  boppers   Dec-15-08 10:53 PM   #22 
   And I bet some of them are smart, qualified individuals  gmudem   Dec-16-08 12:23 AM   #33 
      This stupid Govenor appoitnment thing I feel has outlived its simplicity  Jake3463   Dec-16-08 04:33 AM   #53 
      ask Louise Slaughter - she apparently supports Caroline  onenote   Dec-16-08 02:43 PM   #61 
         Where are you from?  gmudem   Dec-16-08 04:53 PM   #63 
            I now live in the DC area. I lived in New York in the 70s and still have a lot of family there.  onenote   Dec-16-08 05:38 PM   #68 
   You need to come to grips with the fact that if Caroline wants the seat,  Tarheel_Dem   Dec-15-08 10:43 PM   #16 
   "... if Caroline wants the seat, it's hers." So you acknowledge cronyism? nepotism?  ShortnFiery   Dec-16-08 12:41 AM   #45 
      WTF do you care? Like the o.p., she won't be representing you.  Tarheel_Dem   Dec-16-08 09:58 PM   #69 
   What part of NY is Portland in?  Bleachers7   Dec-15-08 10:45 PM   #17 
   Last I checked, this was about a US senate seat.  boppers   Dec-15-08 11:07 PM   #25 
      Yeah! If you aren't in NY, then you shouldn't even have an opinion!  AndrewP   Dec-15-08 11:22 PM   #26 
   Yay for them!  Lex   Dec-15-08 10:47 PM   #19 
   A New Yorker who knows some of the Senators, not all equally worthy. Many unworthy.  MarjorieG   Dec-15-08 10:50 PM   #21 
   The NYS Legislature is not a treasure trove of great leadership, unfortunately  Lavender Brown   Dec-15-08 10:53 PM   #23 
   And all 29 can  verges   Dec-15-08 11:27 PM   #27 
   i finally get it  swampg8r   Dec-16-08 12:05 AM   #29 
   Huh?  boppers   Dec-16-08 12:18 AM   #30 
   Biden was only on a city council when asked to run in 1972  Jennicut   Dec-16-08 12:21 AM   #32 
   Do you really think Caroline is an "outsider?"  gmudem   Dec-16-08 12:25 AM   #34 
   Yeah, I guess not. She has not been a politician her whole life but has grown up in it.  Jennicut   Dec-16-08 12:27 AM   #36 
      That would probably be better.  gmudem   Dec-16-08 12:34 AM   #37 
         How the hell do you know the appt would be based on her family name?  Tarheel_Dem   Dec-16-08 10:07 PM   #70 
   This is where we intersect with Blago and corruption.  boppers   Dec-16-08 12:35 AM   #39 
   Chelsea would be fine with me in like 10 years, she is a bit young  Jennicut   Dec-16-08 12:44 AM   #46 
   heck... Moynihan couldn't even get elected  whistler162   Dec-16-08 12:40 AM   #43 
   thank you for conclusively establishing that having run for office isn't a guarantee  onenote   Dec-16-08 12:25 AM   #35 
   DUmmy award for worst post in this day of very DUmb posts.  sofedupwithbush   Dec-16-08 12:35 AM   #38 
   Don't worry, I just posted another.  boppers   Dec-16-08 12:53 AM   #47 
      Yeah, I saw it. Nice work.  sofedupwithbush   Dec-16-08 12:54 AM   #48 
         Hm. Being congratulated on being a DUmmy...  boppers   Dec-16-08 01:02 AM   #49 
   Excellent point. But too many of our fellow DUers want to believe in the FANTASY of Camelot.  ShortnFiery   Dec-16-08 12:36 AM   #40 
   Okay.... lets have Paterson appoint Bruno!  whistler162   Dec-16-08 12:39 AM   #42 
   I remember being told a Senator shouldn't be prez, because it had  babylonsister   Dec-16-08 01:20 AM   #50 
   How many of them are black?  Radical Activist   Dec-16-08 04:48 AM   #54 
   Ruben Diaz is black. He also is adamantly anti-gay, anti-abortion and votes with the conservative  onenote   Dec-16-08 02:19 PM   #60 
   I'm glad the only thing that's important is "party loyalty". Seems to be the only thing that matters  Double_Talk_Express   Dec-16-08 06:41 AM   #55 
   more qualified? per who's and which criteria? n/t  sohndrsmith   Dec-16-08 10:56 AM   #57 
   29 people who are no doubt beholden to this special interest or that . . .  OneBlueSky   Dec-16-08 02:01 PM   #58 
   so you'd rather have Ruben Diaz Sr than Caroline Kennedy?  onenote   Dec-16-08 02:18 PM   #59 
   Actually, I wouldn't trust a lot of those people with a shiny nickel.  TheWraith   Dec-16-08 04:33 PM   #62 
   I am willing to bet Kennedy could beat any one of those 29 in an election  MN Against Bush   Dec-16-08 05:09 PM   #65 
   Being elected does not equal being qualified. Bush was elected, more or less.  polichick   Dec-16-08 05:12 PM   #66 
   Governor Paterson? Is that you?  SidneyCarton   Dec-16-08 05:34 PM   #67 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals  |  Links  |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2009 Democratic Underground, LLC