| 120. Fuck the fucking Clintons |
|
Sorry, but they are really getting under my nerves. Those two are carpetbaggers. Obama should have never appointed anyone affiliated with Clinton-- this will be a never-ending dramatic nightmare.
|
| -MSNBC's First Read: "Caroline vs. the Clintons?" |
ClarkUSA |
Dec-15-08 09:14 AM |
#0 |
-
I will give up my support of Caroline Kennedy IF |
floridablue |
Dec-15-08 09:20 AM |
#1 |
 -
In regards to Jennifer Lopez, to be fooled by the rocks that she got... |
wyldwolf |
Dec-15-08 09:24 AM |
#2 |
-
No one should be fooled.. i am sure with all the rocks shes got |
Sebass1271 |
Dec-15-08 01:54 PM |
#65 |
-
I have yet to see a statement by Senator Clinton about this issue |
prodn2000 |
Dec-15-08 09:25 AM |
#3 |
 -
That's how I see it, also. I don't believe any of these people represent |
Arkansas Granny |
Dec-15-08 10:04 AM |
#15 |
 -
Yes, the headline is BS |
rvablue |
Dec-15-08 04:37 PM |
#114 |
 -
Exactly. Makes better news to stir up the pot though. |
kikiek |
Dec-16-08 07:37 AM |
#138 |
-
This is exactly what I guessed was happening, and we can see it in a |
pnwmom |
Dec-15-08 09:25 AM |
#4 |
 -
Deleted sub-thread |
Name removed |
Dec-15-08 10:01 AM |
#14 |
 -
Well, Hold It |
Crisco |
Dec-15-08 11:15 AM |
#30 |
  -
"A taste of their own medicine?" |
karynnj |
Dec-15-08 11:55 AM |
#41 |
   -
I Can Only Assume |
Crisco |
Dec-15-08 01:16 PM |
#56 |
  -
Of course I was here |
karynnj |
Dec-15-08 01:30 PM |
#60 |
  -
"A taste of their own medicine"? |
zidzi |
Dec-15-08 04:00 PM |
#99 |
 -
Actually I am supporting Caroline, and I have seen many known Hillary supporters doing the same. |
kikiek |
Dec-16-08 07:39 AM |
#139 |
-
Caroline Kennedy is simply unqualified |
Onlooker |
Dec-15-08 09:38 AM |
#5 |
 -
Don't worry, she'll run in 2010 and 2012..let the other NY Dems run against her |
BluegrassDem |
Dec-15-08 09:46 AM |
#6 |
  -
There will be no dem primary. |
Bleachers7 |
Dec-15-08 09:55 AM |
#9 |
 -
She's no more qualified than Hillary was in 2000. |
Bleachers7 |
Dec-15-08 09:54 AM |
#8 |
  -
Hillary ran. she wasn't appointed. |
cali |
Dec-15-08 09:58 AM |
#10 |
   -
There is no option to run, so what do we do now? |
Bleachers7 |
Dec-15-08 09:59 AM |
#12 |
    -
That's something Paterson will have to figure out. |
cali |
Dec-15-08 10:05 AM |
#16 |
   -
She was given the nomination as everyone else ceded it to her |
karynnj |
Dec-15-08 11:57 AM |
#42 |
  -
And she ran against a weak candidate when Giuliani dropped out. |
Alexander |
Dec-16-08 12:06 PM |
#174 |
  -
Bingo. |
Lucky 13 |
Dec-15-08 11:22 AM |
#32 |
 -
Caroline's not "running." |
dbaker41 |
Dec-15-08 03:18 PM |
#77 |
 -
So? Does that mean she's less qualified? |
Lucky 13 |
Dec-16-08 11:28 AM |
#164 |
 -
She's raised over $350 million as the chief fundraiser for the NYC Department |
pnwmom |
Dec-15-08 11:14 AM |
#29 |
  -
What exactly did she do to raise the money? |
Onlooker |
Dec-15-08 09:29 PM |
#126 |
 -
"obsessed"? What makes you think that? She writes about her family sometimes but not ALL |
CTyankee |
Dec-15-08 12:59 PM |
#52 |
 -
Strom Thurmond was "unqualified" for DECADES |
SoCalDem |
Dec-16-08 04:07 AM |
#137 |
 -
She is qualified and trustworthy. Which I can't say about a whole |
harun |
Dec-16-08 08:22 AM |
#147 |
 -
She is as qualified as Hillary was when she ran. Period. |
Lucky 13 |
Dec-16-08 12:11 PM |
#175 |
  -
Nope. We just don't have "royalty" in this country. |
dbaker41 |
Dec-16-08 02:09 PM |
#191 |
 -
beyond the lawyer thing they both share and being a part of a |
roguevalley |
Dec-16-08 03:33 PM |
#192 |
-
I wonder if Weiner, Ackerman, and Silver said the same things about Hillary in 2000. |
Bleachers7 |
Dec-15-08 09:53 AM |
#7 |
-
Robert F Kennedy had NO electoral experience ? What BS! |
saracat |
Dec-15-08 09:58 AM |
#11 |
 -
What "experience" did Hillary have? |
Bleachers7 |
Dec-15-08 10:01 AM |
#13 |
  -
HIllary was part of the national scene for ages. She worked for several presidential and |
saracat |
Dec-15-08 10:12 AM |
#17 |
 -
Caroline headed up the VP vetting process along with Eric Holder, the incoming AG. |
ClarkUSA |
Dec-15-08 10:21 AM |
#20 |
  -
That is hardly being actively involved. Vetting isn't campaigning and neither is giving a few |
saracat |
Dec-15-08 10:26 PM |
#129 |
 -
You've got to be kidding. Vetting Obama's VP pick is "hardly being actively involved"? |
ClarkUSA |
Dec-16-08 11:06 AM |
#157 |
 -
You seem to think she did it alone and was a lot more invoved than was indicated. |
saracat |
Dec-16-08 12:14 PM |
#176 |
 -
No, that's not what I think at all, but you act like Caroline did nothing important when she did. |
ClarkUSA |
Dec-16-08 12:30 PM |
#178 |
 -
If 8 years is ages, then Caroline has been involved for a lifetime. |
Bleachers7 |
Dec-15-08 10:36 AM |
#22 |
 -
8 years ago, Hillary had no Official Experience. This year she ran for President |
Billy Shears |
Dec-15-08 11:37 AM |
#35 |
 -
Caroline worked in at least one campaign office and spoke of it in 2004 |
karynnj |
Dec-15-08 12:07 PM |
#46 |
  -
Never mind. Real experience on the campaign trail is obviously of no importance to some. Whatever. |
saracat |
Dec-15-08 10:21 PM |
#128 |
 -
Yeah, she has real campaign trail experience with poorly managed, ineffectual, campaign FAILURES. |
Lucky 13 |
Dec-16-08 12:38 PM |
#181 |
 -
Really? Don't know much if anything about the Clinton Presidential campaigns do ya? |
saracat |
Dec-16-08 01:25 PM |
#188 |
 -
I know she was his WIFE while he was running. |
Lucky 13 |
Dec-16-08 01:27 PM |
#189 |
 -
Hillary was the originator and guiding force behind the famous Clinton War Room |
saracat |
Dec-16-08 01:58 PM |
#190 |
 -
Involvement in a CAMPAIGN does not qualify one for office! |
Lucky 13 |
Dec-16-08 12:35 PM |
#180 |
 -
Caroline will have to be elected -- twice -- if she is to retain this seat. |
pnwmom |
Dec-15-08 11:16 AM |
#31 |
-
i love that she is interested. |
psychmommy |
Dec-15-08 10:16 AM |
#18 |
-
Isn't that the same problem Chris Matthews will run into? |
Blu Dahlia |
Dec-15-08 10:19 AM |
#19 |
 -
Not so much... PA Gov. Rendell et al are mature enough not to hold primary grudges |
ClarkUSA |
Dec-15-08 10:32 AM |
#21 |
  -
Rendell clearly demonstrates both sexism and racism ... with as side of diarrhea of the mouth. |
ShortnFiery |
Dec-15-08 03:29 PM |
#86 |
 -
Too funny! This is ONE topic = No Matthews for PA Senate = that Hillary fans and I concur ... |
ShortnFiery |
Dec-15-08 03:27 PM |
#84 |
-
N.Y.S. may have another |
disndat |
Dec-15-08 10:36 AM |
#23 |
 -
What state do you live in? |
Bleachers7 |
Dec-15-08 10:38 AM |
#25 |
-
People from outside of NY that are worried about this should get lost. |
Bleachers7 |
Dec-15-08 10:36 AM |
#24 |
 -
LOL |
ClarkUSA |
Dec-15-08 01:31 PM |
#61 |
-
Interesting that you're still buying into the media's divisivness. I'm a huge Hillary supporter and |
MetricSystem |
Dec-15-08 10:53 AM |
#26 |
 -
Your personal reaction does not disprove media observations of who's been publicly dissing Caroline |
ClarkUSA |
Dec-15-08 11:05 AM |
#27 |
-
Aw bullshit. But you bought into it and look at this thread. The ugliness of the campaign is back. |
kikiek |
Dec-16-08 07:42 AM |
#140 |
-
lol! You're one to preach about being "real classy" with that language! |
ClarkUSA |
Dec-16-08 08:09 AM |
#143 |
-
They are trying to sell something. Apparently so are you. You're full of it so |
kikiek |
Dec-16-08 08:21 AM |
#146 |
-
Stop disrupting this thread with your personal attacks. Is that the only reason you're here? |
ClarkUSA |
Dec-16-08 08:55 AM |
#148 |
-
Oh you weren't looking for trouble with that post. Hahaha yeah sure. |
kikiek |
Dec-16-08 06:24 PM |
#194 |
-
Still here? You sure are looking for trouble with your replies on this thread, eh? |
ClarkUSA |
Dec-17-08 08:17 AM |
#198 |
-
I'm tired of making this argument, but here it goes again. |
Beacool |
Dec-15-08 11:08 AM |
#28 |
 -
if a non-New Yorker can be elected, a New Yorker can be appointed |
Billy Shears |
Dec-15-08 11:40 AM |
#36 |
 -
What is RFKjr's track record - other than endorsing HRC, who lost |
karynnj |
Dec-15-08 12:13 PM |
#48 |
 -
Look at it this way: Caroline Kennedy knows her name and persona can help Obama |
CTyankee |
Dec-15-08 01:06 PM |
#54 |
  -
You're echoing an assessment in the current New York magazine story, "The Cinderella Kennedy" |
ClarkUSA |
Dec-15-08 01:17 PM |
#57 |
   -
Gawd, that's funny! I never read that piece but it sure does mirror what I said! |
CTyankee |
Dec-15-08 01:37 PM |
#62 |
  -
GMTA, obviously ; ) |
ClarkUSA |
Dec-15-08 02:03 PM |
#68 |
  -
My sentiments entirely! I couldn't have said it better. |
CTyankee |
Dec-15-08 03:41 PM |
#93 |
  -
Sure... |
ClarkUSA |
Dec-15-08 06:24 PM |
#122 |
  -
Right back atcha! Thanks for the GMTA translation. I'm flattered! |
CTyankee |
Dec-15-08 06:40 PM |
#123 |
  -
It's been a pleasure. |
ClarkUSA |
Dec-16-08 09:01 AM |
#149 |
  -
It's a deal! |
CTyankee |
Dec-16-08 11:21 AM |
#162 |
  -
Good. |
ClarkUSA |
Dec-16-08 12:52 PM |
#186 |
  -
sure thing! a good road ahead (if tough)...n/t |
CTyankee |
Dec-16-08 01:18 PM |
#187 |
  -
"She just wants to give back." ... No, a good part of it is for family dynasty ... |
ShortnFiery |
Dec-15-08 03:32 PM |
#88 |
   -
I think if she wanted dynasty she would have become more active earlier |
CTyankee |
Dec-15-08 04:08 PM |
#105 |
  -
It's all a BIG CLUB ... and you and I are not in it. |
ShortnFiery |
Dec-15-08 10:16 PM |
#127 |
  -
If you cannot see the difference between Caroline Kennedy and, say, Dick Cheney |
CTyankee |
Dec-16-08 08:09 AM |
#144 |
  -
This isn't about Obama.It is about NY and what is best for NY State. |
saracat |
Dec-15-08 10:37 PM |
#131 |
 -
Would Nita Lowey have stepped aside for "Hillary Smith"? |
Starbucks Anarchist |
Dec-16-08 11:08 AM |
#158 |
 -
As you said. |
PM Martin |
Dec-16-08 09:32 PM |
#195 |
-
the Clintonites are starting to realize that Obama has plans for who comes after him |
Billy Shears |
Dec-15-08 11:24 AM |
#33 |
 -
Yeah, right. |
Beacool |
Dec-15-08 11:43 AM |
#37 |
  -
in 8 years, Hillary went from no elected experience to Presidential Frontrunner |
Billy Shears |
Dec-15-08 11:49 AM |
#39 |
 -
Clintonites? |
ronnykmarshall |
Dec-15-08 03:24 PM |
#82 |
-
I live in Obamaland. And believe you me, I'm enjoying every moment of it. |
Billy Shears |
Dec-15-08 03:31 PM |
#87 |
-
You may think you live in Obamaland |
ronnykmarshall |
Dec-15-08 03:48 PM |
#97 |
-
no, it's Obamaland. I just saw him on TV announcing some of his Cabinet |
Billy Shears |
Dec-15-08 04:23 PM |
#106 |
 -
What are you 12? |
ronnykmarshall |
Dec-15-08 04:42 PM |
#117 |
-
Oh that is the best response I have ever seen on DU. Love it. |
kikiek |
Dec-16-08 07:46 AM |
#141 |
-
Doing MSM's work for them. |
Jakes Progress |
Dec-15-08 11:30 AM |
#34 |
 -
WHY am I supposed to believe ANYTHING the media says? |
Notorious Bohemian |
Dec-15-08 11:46 AM |
#38 |
-
If this is true, one really ironic thing is that Clinton allies are punishing |
karynnj |
Dec-15-08 11:51 AM |
#40 |
 -
Some of them are bitter and want revenge. |
Alexander |
Dec-15-08 12:00 PM |
#43 |
  -
It's ironic to see those that screeched "sexism" with their boot on Caroline's neck. |
AtomicKitten |
Dec-15-08 12:04 PM |
#44 |
 -
Yeah, funny how they whine about "dynasties" too. |
Alexander |
Dec-15-08 12:05 PM |
#45 |
 -
what's funny is that some people don't know the definition of |
paulk |
Dec-15-08 12:10 PM |
#47 |
 -
But in 2010, guess who is old enough to run? |
Alexander |
Dec-15-08 12:31 PM |
#51 |
  -
that's an absurd argument |
paulk |
Dec-15-08 01:48 PM |
#63 |
 -
Absurd is their logic. |
Jakes Progress |
Dec-15-08 03:11 PM |
#74 |
  -
At least we actually use logic instead of double standards. |
Alexander |
Dec-15-08 03:36 PM |
#90 |
 -
No, you let me guess. |
Jakes Progress |
Dec-15-08 04:28 PM |
#111 |
 -
That's all you have, guesses, assumptions and bullshit. |
Alexander |
Dec-16-08 11:00 AM |
#154 |
 -
You are quite a bit more |
Jakes Progress |
Dec-16-08 11:20 AM |
#161 |
 -
So now you're a mind reader. Excellent! |
Alexander |
Dec-16-08 11:42 AM |
#167 |
 -
Consistent to the extreme. |
Jakes Progress |
Dec-16-08 11:57 AM |
#171 |
 -
And you're not consistent at all. |
Alexander |
Dec-16-08 12:04 PM |
#173 |
 -
Wow. Just Wow. |
Jakes Progress |
Dec-16-08 12:41 PM |
#184 |
 -
I thought it was absurd that Hillary Clinton would run in New York. |
Alexander |
Dec-15-08 03:34 PM |
#89 |
 -
dynasties also usually do something memorable. |
Billy Shears |
Dec-15-08 01:21 PM |
#59 |
  -
so are you going to start using Republican arguments now |
paulk |
Dec-15-08 01:53 PM |
#64 |
 -
no, I just agree with you that the Clintons don't qualify as a Dynasty |
Billy Shears |
Dec-15-08 02:02 PM |
#67 |
 -
Now don't go using facts and words |
Jakes Progress |
Dec-15-08 03:09 PM |
#73 |
  -
Ah yes, anyone that doesn't worship at the Clinton altar is a "hater". |
Alexander |
Dec-15-08 03:37 PM |
#92 |
 -
I like Caroline. |
Jakes Progress |
Dec-15-08 04:24 PM |
#109 |
 -
Newsflash: I don't hate the Clintons. |
Alexander |
Dec-16-08 10:56 AM |
#152 |
 -
You asked if I could |
Jakes Progress |
Dec-16-08 11:15 AM |
#159 |
 -
I see you've answered my question. |
Alexander |
Dec-16-08 11:34 AM |
#166 |
 -
Read a few. |
Jakes Progress |
Dec-16-08 11:54 AM |
#169 |
 -
In that case, I'm sorry you failed reading comprehension. |
Alexander |
Dec-16-08 12:01 PM |
#172 |
 -
See the above reply for a definition |
Jakes Progress |
Dec-16-08 12:40 PM |
#183 |
 -
True. |
PM Martin |
Dec-16-08 09:36 PM |
#196 |
 -
maybe they don't think she deserves the job |
paulk |
Dec-15-08 12:18 PM |
#49 |
  -
Yet Hillary Clinton somehow did? |
Alexander |
Dec-15-08 12:30 PM |
#50 |
   -
try to stay on topic |
paulk |
Dec-15-08 01:58 PM |
#66 |
  -
But Hillary bashing is his only topic. nt |
Jakes Progress |
Dec-15-08 03:12 PM |
#75 |
   -
And hit-and-run, fact-free snark posts are yours. |
Alexander |
Dec-15-08 03:44 PM |
#95 |
    -
Oh, you will win. |
Jakes Progress |
Dec-15-08 04:29 PM |
#112 |
   -
You're right. Because I use facts. |
Alexander |
Dec-16-08 11:01 AM |
#155 |
   -
It is your life. |
Jakes Progress |
Dec-16-08 11:24 AM |
#163 |
   -
Yep. Yours is so busy that you spend it PMing other Clinton supporters |
Alexander |
Dec-16-08 11:47 AM |
#168 |
   -
Ah, again the attack |
Jakes Progress |
Dec-16-08 12:17 PM |
#177 |
   -
Yeah, because I dare to call you out on your nonsense, it's an "attack". |
Alexander |
Dec-16-08 12:34 PM |
#179 |
   -
Easy because of my profession. |
Jakes Progress |
Dec-16-08 12:43 PM |
#185 |
   -
That's for damn sure. |
ronnykmarshall |
Dec-15-08 03:59 PM |
#98 |
  -
When have your posts been anything other than Clinton worship |
Alexander |
Dec-15-08 04:05 PM |
#102 |
  -
Perhaps you need to read more. |
ronnykmarshall |
Dec-15-08 04:42 PM |
#115 |
  -
Still waiting for your responce. |
ronnykmarshall |
Dec-15-08 08:30 PM |
#125 |
  -
If we hold them to equal standards, HRC and KCS had the same qualifications... |
Alexander |
Dec-15-08 03:43 PM |
#94 |
  -
You are betraying |
Jakes Progress |
Dec-15-08 04:32 PM |
#113 |
  -
So, can you refute what I said with FACTS? No, of course not. |
Alexander |
Dec-16-08 11:02 AM |
#156 |
  -
Take some deep cleansing breaths. |
Jakes Progress |
Dec-16-08 11:31 AM |
#165 |
  -
No thanks, I'd rather not huff the noxious fumes of your bullshit. |
Alexander |
Dec-16-08 11:55 AM |
#170 |
  -
You ask questions you know the answers to. |
Jakes Progress |
Dec-16-08 12:39 PM |
#182 |
  -
That is why I started my post with a conditional phrase |
karynnj |
Dec-15-08 01:02 PM |
#53 |
 -
You are being played. |
Jakes Progress |
Dec-15-08 03:06 PM |
#71 |
-
MSNBC Breaking News: "NY Times: Caroline Kennedy To Seek Senate Seat" with link to story --> |
ClarkUSA |
Dec-15-08 01:10 PM |
#55 |
-
when has Zimmerman ever not been a complete asshole? |
Billy Shears |
Dec-15-08 01:19 PM |
#58 |
 -
I give up... when? Can't think of any. |
ClarkUSA |
Dec-16-08 03:46 PM |
#193 |
-
Story is being discussed on MSNBC now |
ClarkUSA |
Dec-15-08 02:19 PM |
#69 |
-
Misleading headline.... |
S_E_Fudd |
Dec-15-08 02:33 PM |
#70 |
 -
MSNBC's First Read made a point to include a question mark, so I don't see where it's misleading |
ClarkUSA |
Dec-15-08 03:07 PM |
#72 |
-
Same as their oft used "Some Say" before slamming someone... |
S_E_Fudd |
Dec-15-08 03:17 PM |
#76 |
-
The stories named very familiar names... so your analogy seems inaccurate. |
ClarkUSA |
Dec-15-08 03:20 PM |
#78 |
-
Was either Bill, Hillary or Chelsea Clinton named ?...nt |
S_E_Fudd |
Dec-15-08 03:24 PM |
#81 |
-
Maybe by some voices in someone's head(s). |
ronnykmarshall |
Dec-15-08 03:26 PM |
#83 |
-
Um, maybe this wouldn't be the first time known mouthpieces have been used in a proxy fight? |
ClarkUSA |
Dec-15-08 03:29 PM |
#85 |
-
the Clintons plausible deniability with these Parrots became implausible years ago |
Billy Shears |
Dec-15-08 03:36 PM |
#91 |
 -
I don't want to replay the primaries... |
S_E_Fudd |
Dec-15-08 04:04 PM |
#101 |
-
but it's not Obama that Zimmerman is after this time. |
Billy Shears |
Dec-15-08 04:26 PM |
#110 |
-
And until there is any evidence for that ...the headline is misleading... |
S_E_Fudd |
Dec-15-08 04:01 PM |
#100 |
-
I disagree. The "evidence" involves using common sense deductive reasoning. |
ClarkUSA |
Dec-15-08 04:06 PM |
#103 |
-
Yes...the common sense deductive reasoning here |
S_E_Fudd |
Dec-15-08 04:07 PM |
#104 |
-
In this case of concerted high-profile kvetching attacks on Caroline, yes. |
ClarkUSA |
Dec-15-08 04:23 PM |
#107 |
-
With the Clinton's... |
S_E_Fudd |
Dec-15-08 04:24 PM |
#108 |
-
See reply #103. |
ClarkUSA |
Dec-15-08 04:42 PM |
#116 |
-
Yeah... |
S_E_Fudd |
Dec-15-08 04:45 PM |
#118 |
-
Agreed. |
ClarkUSA |
Dec-15-08 05:03 PM |
#121 |
-
man does anybody other then me get really sick of seeing some |
okieinpain |
Dec-15-08 03:22 PM |
#79 |
-
How about no more ROYALTY - no one should be selected because of their name or their family ... |
ShortnFiery |
Dec-15-08 03:23 PM |
#80 |
 -
For once I agree with you, up to a point. |
Beacool |
Dec-15-08 11:34 PM |
#133 |
-
Now often do sitting candidates lose in the primaries in New York? |
question everything |
Dec-15-08 03:46 PM |
#96 |
 -
So...what if CKS is actually a SUCCESSFUL Progressive senator? |
CakeGrrl |
Dec-16-08 03:13 AM |
#136 |
-
Why is there ALWAYS drama with Clinton and her supporters? |
Wolsh |
Dec-15-08 05:00 PM |
#119 |
 -
On MSNBC this afternoon, Amy Stoddard of The Hill called it... |
ClarkUSA |
Dec-15-08 07:11 PM |
#124 |
-
Fuck the fucking Clintons |
LittleBlue |
Dec-15-08 05:02 PM |
#120 |
 -
Oh look, another manufactured excuse for people to get their Clinton hate on. |
MetricSystem |
Dec-15-08 10:34 PM |
#130 |
-
Don't argue with assholes, it never goes well. |
Beacool |
Dec-15-08 11:31 PM |
#132 |
-
Wow, I am envious. That sounds so amazing. Yeah, DU has decided to pit Hillary vs. Caroline as an |
MetricSystem |
Dec-15-08 11:38 PM |
#134 |
-
Same old jerks, different fight. |
Beacool |
Dec-15-08 11:55 PM |
#135 |
 -
Pot, meet kettle. I seem to recall a recent anti-Kennedy meme OP by you... |
ClarkUSA |
Dec-16-08 10:48 AM |
#151 |
-
Yeah and it isn't even true. The whole split is different. More along bucking the name it appears. |
kikiek |
Dec-16-08 07:50 AM |
#142 |
-
This thing has gotten out of control. Just appoint someone already and get on with it. |
Jennicut |
Dec-16-08 08:18 AM |
#145 |
-
"How many freshman senators at the bottom of the seniority list can pick up the phone and get... |
sohndrsmith |
Dec-16-08 09:04 AM |
#150 |
-
i really dont understand what the clintons have to do with anything |
iamthebandfanman |
Dec-16-08 10:59 AM |
#153 |
-
CNN is discussing this issue now; the usual suspects are attacking Caroline. |
ClarkUSA |
Dec-16-08 11:16 AM |
#160 |
-
They wish. Divide and Conquer is the GOP's favorite game. Engels said THIS is why workers in the US |
McCamy Taylor |
Dec-16-08 10:58 PM |
#197 |
-
Well, now Hillary has called off her dogs. |
polichick |
Dec-17-08 08:57 AM |
#199 |
-
NYT today describes Caroline's efforts to win over officials and visit the upstate area. |
ClarkUSA |
Dec-17-08 11:18 AM |
#200 |
-
CKS should promise to create 200,000 new jobs upstate. |
heraldsqure |
Dec-17-08 01:42 PM |
#201 |
-
Isn't that what Hillary did? |
ClarkUSA |
Dec-17-08 04:06 PM |
#202 |