You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #93: My sentiments entirely! I couldn't have said it better. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 04:41 PM
Response to Reply #68
93. My sentiments entirely! I couldn't have said it better.
That Obama thinks so highly of her just reinforces my view of her. His judgment is pretty damn good and I really don't think he's all starry eyed over her. He just respects her deeply and doesn't mind asking her for this. I think it underscores the importance of getting his agenda through Congress; it is where she can be enormously helpful. I think she knew that the "time had come."

I am dismayed by the disrespectful tone of some DUers about Caroline Kennedy. They regard her as some kind of schemer who is "obsessed" with her family's story! I think that's crazy. She strikes me as one of the most balanced members of the Kennedy family (see my post above on this). It is so unfair and I feel embarrassed that any of my fellow liberals would act like this!

I do, however, think it's worth considering the "dynasty" issue. There are a lot of DUers distressed about this. I know of one who is downright apoplectic, a really angry person. Here's a thought about dynasty: the whole idea of a ruling dynasty is distasteful from the point of view of a democracy and I agree with that entirely. Now, one would think that Obama is at polar opposites with anything that smacks of dynasty, yet he is her strongest proponent. So, what he knows about her must have convinced him that she transcends the dynasty issue. I think we have to remember that our second president, himself a founder of our nation, had a son who also served as president. Yet no dynasty of Adamses ever came into being. So if it was ok for old John Adams, it's just fine with me!

Oh, by the way, could you tell me what GMTA stands for? I've been wracking my brain trying to figure it out...



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC