Clio the Leo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Dec-13-08 07:37 AM
Response to Reply #22 |
| 25. He doesn't strike me as the brightest bulb..... |
|
... on the IL Christmas tree.
|
| -Why does Jesse Jackson, Jr. need a lawyer? |
question everything |
Dec-12-08 11:32 PM |
#0 |
 -
Well seeing that he's been named as someone who works for him possibly offering a bribe |
Jake3463 |
Dec-12-08 11:41 PM |
#1 |
| -
To protect his legal rights. There's nothing wrong with it. NT |
Clio the Leo |
Dec-12-08 11:46 PM |
#2 |
| -
Any time your name is included in an inquiry, you should get a lawyer. |
napi21 |
Dec-12-08 11:56 PM |
#3 |
  -
But how do you prove a negative? |
question everything |
Dec-13-08 12:13 AM |
#6 |
| -
Welcome to our legal system, my friend. I don't agree with it either, |
napi21 |
Dec-13-08 01:18 AM |
#16 |
| -
Why do you need us to answer this question? |
Hanse |
Dec-13-08 12:07 AM |
#4 |
| -
Try not to be such an ass. Someone doesn't understand something |
acmavm |
Dec-14-08 08:54 AM |
#31 |
| -
Hiring a lawyer does not mean he is guilty of anything. |
murielm99 |
Dec-13-08 12:08 AM |
#5 |
| -
If you "lie" to the federal investigators you can be charged and |
merh |
Dec-13-08 12:18 AM |
#7 |
| -
Scary. But I can see your point (nt) |
question everything |
Dec-13-08 12:25 AM |
#9 |
| -
I'll give you a perfect example of that happening. |
merh |
Dec-13-08 12:41 AM |
#10 |
| -
as you are indirectly pointing out, prosecutors are judged by how well they get convictions |
Douglas Carpenter |
Dec-13-08 01:06 AM |
#13 |
| -
Sadly, your brother is correct. |
merh |
Dec-13-08 01:11 AM |
#15 |
| -
My wife's thesis advisor |
Vattel |
Dec-13-08 05:23 AM |
#20 |
| -
This is horrible. Of course we've heard of many cases where |
question everything |
Dec-13-08 10:12 PM |
#29 |
| -
Yep |
Jake3463 |
Dec-13-08 11:15 AM |
#28 |
| -
JJ is a "target" in Fitz' investigation.. |
ananda |
Dec-13-08 12:24 AM |
#8 |
| -
Where'd you hear that? |
janeaustin |
Dec-13-08 01:39 AM |
#17 |
| -
You ALWAYS need a lawyer when talking to investigators |
alcibiades_mystery |
Dec-13-08 12:45 AM |
#11 |
| -
Amen to that! |
shayes51 |
Dec-14-08 08:44 AM |
#30 |
| -
Here, this lawyer's website explains it. |
merh |
Dec-13-08 12:54 AM |
#12 |
| -
Thanks for the link |
question everything |
Dec-13-08 01:09 AM |
#14 |
| -
Unfortunately, it doesn't "look" great for Jackson.....based on appearances |
FrenchieCat |
Dec-13-08 01:48 AM |
#18 |
| -
OH PLEASE!!!!!!! |
bigdarryl |
Dec-13-08 05:00 AM |
#19 |
| -
Frenchiecat is right. |
Vattel |
Dec-13-08 05:33 AM |
#21 |
| -
Yup, on the surface,it doesn't look good for JJJ -- I think he pulled some shenanigans |
LostinVA |
Dec-13-08 06:52 AM |
#23 |
| -
Getting a lawyer is the smart thing to do. I'm wondering why JJJ wasn't on Rahm's list... |
polichick |
Dec-13-08 06:50 AM |
#22 |
| -
He doesn't strike me as the brightest bulb..... |
Clio the Leo |
Dec-13-08 07:37 AM |
#25 |
| -
I shed no tears for the Jesse Jackson clan |
Unsane |
Dec-13-08 07:24 AM |
#24 |
| -
"they're a motley, crooked bunch" - How so? nt |
polichick |
Dec-13-08 11:04 AM |
#27 |
| -
He's a democrat. 'nuff said. nt |
LaydeeBug |
Dec-13-08 08:29 AM |
#26 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread