MoonRiver
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-28-08 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #15 |
| -In all seriousness, and let's be extremely honest here. |
cboy4 |
Nov-28-08 11:29 AM |
#0 |
-
It is frustrating |
Marrah_G |
Nov-28-08 11:31 AM |
#1 |
-
Some people don't trust her |
sandnsea |
Nov-28-08 11:32 AM |
#2 |
 -
I think the point about trust is the biggest issue. |
peace13 |
Nov-28-08 11:38 AM |
#5 |
-
Speaking of "the rules" it sounds to me like you are calling out the mods... |
ddeclue |
Nov-28-08 11:35 AM |
#3 |
-
This is about the fourth post damning non-existent posts supposedly anti-Hillary. |
indie_ana_500 |
Nov-28-08 11:35 AM |
#4 |
 -
Over the last couple of days the Hill posts have been way down. |
peace13 |
Nov-28-08 11:42 AM |
#6 |
  -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Nov-28-08 11:53 AM |
#8 |
 -
It's time for them to stop. |
Balderdash |
Nov-28-08 11:51 AM |
#7 |
 -
I almost never see any of this stuff that's supposedly going on. Should I try harder? |
patrice |
Nov-28-08 11:53 AM |
#9 |
 -
What do you think "Hillbots" mean? 3,270 hits searching DU for that word. n/t |
FormerRushFan |
Nov-28-08 11:55 AM |
#11 |
-
I've seen Reid, Pelosi, and Richardson criticized in very unconstructive manners. |
JVS |
Nov-28-08 11:53 AM |
#10 |
 -
Reid, Pelosi? |
peace13 |
Nov-28-08 12:00 PM |
#13 |
  -
And that's where the rub is. Some people really didn't and don't like the records of some... |
JVS |
Nov-28-08 12:15 PM |
#24 |
 -
Yea, but you sure as hell haven't seen them spammed |
cboy4 |
Nov-28-08 12:08 PM |
#18 |
-
Hillary criticism will arise whenever she becomes prominent in the news. |
JVS |
Nov-28-08 12:18 PM |
#26 |
-
And the same old tired untruths will arise simply because she's in the news. |
rug |
Nov-28-08 12:34 PM |
#39 |
-
The same people who hate the Clintons now... |
liberalmuse |
Nov-28-08 11:56 AM |
#12 |
-
yes, TS anyone that criticizes HRC and questions her appointment to the cabinet |
happychatter |
Nov-28-08 12:01 PM |
#14 |
-
repuke propaganda worked on more than just repukes |
Skittles |
Nov-28-08 12:03 PM |
#15 |
 -
excellent point! |
MyPetRock |
Nov-28-08 12:05 PM |
#17 |
-
I gues it's fortunate that I have had very little time to read and post here. |
MyPetRock |
Nov-28-08 12:04 PM |
#16 |
-
I don't understand it either. |
Elrond Hubbard |
Nov-28-08 12:09 PM |
#19 |
-
It's silly and makes me happy about the hide thread option. |
WI_DEM |
Nov-28-08 12:09 PM |
#20 |
 -
Yea, but it's turning into a hide forum option instead of simply |
cboy4 |
Nov-28-08 12:12 PM |
#22 |
  -
Why not ignore the posters who post things you don't like? |
ProSense |
Nov-28-08 12:23 PM |
#31 |
 -
Good idea. |
cboy4 |
Nov-28-08 12:28 PM |
#33 |
  -
You don't know me? Really? n/t |
ProSense |
Nov-28-08 12:35 PM |
#41 |
 -
Why don't "anti-Clinton" posters go to sites that are exclusively "anti-Clinton"? |
bridgit |
Nov-28-08 12:28 PM |
#34 |
 -
Did I suggest anyone go anywhere? There is an ignore button for a reason. n/t |
ProSense |
Nov-28-08 12:34 PM |
#38 |
 -
This is a forum for grown ups. There shouldn't be a need to |
cboy4 |
Nov-28-08 12:48 PM |
#50 |
  -
Then act like one and stop trying to shut down criticism of the Clintons. |
ProSense |
Nov-28-08 12:57 PM |
#55 |
 -
Here's the poetic component of what you *did* suggest... |
bridgit |
Nov-28-08 12:54 PM |
#53 |
 -
I'm seriously considering the hide DU option because there are too many threads to hide. |
elocs |
Nov-28-08 12:37 PM |
#42 |
-
There's quite a few here that pride themselves in following no rules... |
bridgit |
Nov-28-08 12:11 PM |
#21 |
-
DU rules state that personal attacks on other DUers aren't allowed. |
ProSense |
Nov-28-08 12:13 PM |
#23 |
 -
yes |
swampg8r |
Nov-28-08 12:19 PM |
#27 |
-
I think this is the bigger issue. The incivility is bad. |
JVS |
Nov-28-08 12:22 PM |
#30 |
-
Oh brother. |
cboy4 |
Nov-28-08 12:33 PM |
#37 |
-
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Nov-28-08 12:16 PM |
#25 |
 -
Stinky french garlic flavored spam! |
JVS |
Nov-28-08 12:20 PM |
#28 |
-
many long time DUers left DU for good during the Primaries due to the antiHillary venom here nt |
amborin |
Nov-28-08 12:21 PM |
#29 |
 -
no no... there all back now |
happychatter |
Nov-28-08 12:26 PM |
#32 |
-
Actually, they're not back. More than a dozen well known |
cboy4 |
Nov-28-08 12:30 PM |
#35 |
 -
And some are gone because they bullied others relentlessly. |
JVS |
Nov-28-08 12:39 PM |
#43 |
  -
I wonder why some Hillary supporters ultimately lashed out. |
cboy4 |
Nov-28-08 12:45 PM |
#48 |
 -
I find it sad that you think that they were right to break the rules of DU |
JVS |
Nov-28-08 12:47 PM |
#49 |
 -
I said I don't blame them. I didn't say I approved of posting |
cboy4 |
Nov-28-08 12:54 PM |
#52 |
 -
pffft. So are we still being honest or is this just about post-primary rehashing. |
JVS |
Nov-28-08 01:00 PM |
#57 |
 -
The bullies will not be happy until everyone who ever supported her is gone |
Marrah_G |
Nov-28-08 12:41 PM |
#45 |
-
Oh Gawd are they ever?!? With a vengeance ... or is it self-righteousness "Mission from Clinton?" |
ShortnFiery |
Nov-28-08 12:31 PM |
#36 |
-
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Nov-28-08 12:34 PM |
#40 |
-
Thanks for showing everyone exactly what I'm talking about. |
cboy4 |
Nov-28-08 12:40 PM |
#44 |
-
I wish DU had a sticter policy with regards to sites like that. |
JVS |
Nov-28-08 12:42 PM |
#46 |
-
a perfect example of venom---in fact, many antiHilll posters here spewed venom way worse |
amborin |
Nov-28-08 12:43 PM |
#47 |
-
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Nov-28-08 12:55 PM |
#54 |
-
Why are you still so angry? Do you hear me ranting still |
cboy4 |
Nov-28-08 12:59 PM |
#56 |
-
I see an amazing amount of two things |
Lerkfish |
Nov-28-08 12:51 PM |
#51 |
-
. |
DemEtienne |
Nov-28-08 01:01 PM |
#58 |
-
Locking... |
rasputin1952 |
Nov-28-08 01:01 PM |
#59 |