You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #29: Deleted message [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-27-08 09:39 PM
Response to Original message
29. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
  -Bill Clinton's President status allows him to get information Whisp  Nov-27-08 08:08 PM   #0 
  - right -- the clintons will automatically misuse natioanl security info.  xchrom   Nov-27-08 08:11 PM   #1 
  - I think it's a fair question -  Whisp   Nov-27-08 09:03 PM   #9 
     - Maybe we should retroactively impeach him and take away his presidential  BlueStateGirl   Nov-27-08 09:07 PM   #13 
        - I don't trust the Clintons. They've said and done things to Obama  Whisp   Nov-27-08 09:11 PM   #15 
           - I'm sorry, but I think you are being ridiculous. n/t  BlueStateGirl   Nov-27-08 09:18 PM   #19 
           - Give some examples if you're going to make a statement  Maccagirl   Nov-27-08 09:21 PM   #20 
           - Obama has no Tuzla stories.  Whisp   Nov-27-08 09:31 PM   #26 
           - Give it up.  emilyg   Nov-27-08 11:52 PM   #38 
           - Just not true. nt  MookieWilson   Nov-28-08 11:55 AM   #49 
  - Shut up and go eat some turkey n/t  Kerry2008   Nov-27-08 08:16 PM   #2 
  - For God's sakes... He was President for 8 years... She's a  hlthe2b   Nov-27-08 08:23 PM   #3 
  - Freeperish. Yes, that's exactly the word that best describes  TheDebbieDee   Nov-27-08 09:14 PM   #17 
  - And historically ignorant.  MookieWilson   Nov-27-08 09:48 PM   #32 
  - Oh just great. ALL past presidents? Shrub will be a past president soon.  Unbowed   Nov-27-08 08:24 PM   #4 
  - Definitely a reason to prosecute (as if we needed another one).  polichick   Nov-27-08 08:25 PM   #5 
  - Bush behind bars... the stuff that dreams are made of.  Unbowed   Nov-28-08 10:05 AM   #45 
  - Hardly... He's too damned lazy to read his daily briefings now...  hlthe2b   Nov-27-08 08:26 PM   #6 
  - True, but it's still an unsettling thought.  Unbowed   Nov-28-08 09:53 AM   #43 
  - He doesn't read it now so what's the difference.  hobbit709   Nov-27-08 08:29 PM   #7 
  - his Poppy has been doing that for years now.  Whisp   Nov-27-08 09:04 PM   #10 
  - That's disturbing. Unlike Jr, he can read. n/t  Unbowed   Nov-28-08 09:51 AM   #42 
  - I don't think you should worry too much about  murielm99   Nov-27-08 10:59 PM   #35 
  - Big words would be problematic for him, I agree.  Unbowed   Nov-28-08 09:58 AM   #44 
  - He doesn't like to read. n/t  mountainvue   Nov-28-08 02:24 PM   #52 
  - Access to current top secret classified information is a "privilege" of all past presidents?  rug   Nov-27-08 08:58 PM   #8 
  - I believe so, it's something I read here awhile ago and  Whisp   Nov-27-08 09:06 PM   #12 
  - I'm saying the government will not give top secret information to anyone out of office for years.  rug   Nov-27-08 09:07 PM   #14 
  - Past presidents are entitled to continue to recieve the President's  BlueStateGirl   Nov-27-08 09:16 PM   #18 
  - I think this is the link you meant.  rug   Nov-27-08 09:22 PM   #21 
     - If you keep reading you find this...  BlueStateGirl   Nov-27-08 09:24 PM   #22 
        - I didn't see that. That's very curious.  rug   Nov-27-08 09:36 PM   #27 
  - Past Presidents are entitled to see the President's daily intelligence briefing  Hippo_Tron   Nov-27-08 09:27 PM   #23 
     - I'll have to find the statutory authority for that entitlement.  rug   Nov-27-08 09:38 PM   #28 
        - Yea I know it's in the law somewhere  Hippo_Tron   Nov-27-08 09:57 PM   #33 
        - Prez's often talk to their predecessors about policy. nt  MookieWilson   Nov-28-08 11:54 AM   #48 
  - Lousy implication, but if it makes you feel any better, as far as I have  BlueStateGirl   Nov-27-08 09:06 PM   #11 
  - True  Shiver   Nov-27-08 09:13 PM   #16 
  - ...  xchrom   Nov-27-08 09:28 PM   #24 
  - Page one 2 egg Mcmuffins for 2 dollars top secret.  Skink   Nov-27-08 09:29 PM   #25 
  - Deleted message  Name removed   Nov-27-08 09:39 PM   #29 
  - I don't believe he gets them because reading them would require travel restrictions and a larger  MookieWilson   Nov-27-08 09:46 PM   #30 
  - First ladies generally are considered to have access to just about everything.  MookieWilson   Nov-27-08 09:47 PM   #31 
  - Huh? Link?? nt  babylonsister   Nov-27-08 11:24 PM   #37 
     - Long term practice. They go through no clearance process and neither does the prez...  MookieWilson   Nov-28-08 11:53 AM   #47 
  - As Secretary of State, Hillary would have access to far more information than Bill does  Hippo_Tron   Nov-27-08 10:01 PM   #34 
  - Oh goody CLinton has had this access for years and now you  LibFromWV   Nov-27-08 11:09 PM   #36 
  - The Clintons are *not* misusing any confidential information. (nt)  w4rma   Nov-28-08 12:48 AM   #39 
  - Wow. Ignored really seems to hate you!  JVS   Nov-28-08 05:24 AM   #40 
  - All that information would be given to SoS as well.  lojasmo   Nov-28-08 08:49 AM   #41 
  - Not true. See this discussion....  indie_ana_500   Nov-28-08 10:13 AM   #46 
  - I can't remeber where I read or heard this  mountainvue   Nov-28-08 02:23 PM   #50 
  - I could care less. Bill Clinton is no longer part of OUR government system.  ShortnFiery   Nov-28-08 02:24 PM   #51 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC