You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #23: Nonetheless, Obama needs to replace these two. (nt) [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-25-08 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. Nonetheless, Obama needs to replace these two. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -NYT: Geithner And Summers "Have Played Central Roles" In Provoking Crisis LittleApple81  Nov-25-08 12:01 PM   #0 
  - Summers: let's dump our toxic pollution on them:  amborin   Nov-25-08 12:03 PM   #1 
  - Summers is a complete idiot and I'm disappointed that he was chosen.  yardwork   Nov-25-08 03:29 PM   #33 
  - Obama has not done well with his cabinet picks. (nt)  w4rma   Nov-25-08 12:03 PM   #2 
  - I disagree. nt  Occam Bandage   Nov-25-08 12:03 PM   #4 
  - It started out so promising....then he had his meeting with Bush.  blm   Nov-25-08 12:08 PM   #7 
  - So Kerry, the guy who supported the IWR, is more of a progressive than Obama. Gotcha.  GarbagemanLB   Nov-25-08 12:21 PM   #12 
  - IWR is NOT the determining factor in who is or isn't a commited progressive. And further  blm   Nov-25-08 03:16 PM   #29 
  - Can they be confirmed by the Senate, though?  Shiver   Nov-25-08 12:29 PM   #14 
  - There were some with experience in the cabinet and under cabinet who exited as Clinton turned right.  blm   Nov-25-08 03:25 PM   #32 
     - That didn't quite answer my questions  Shiver   Nov-25-08 03:33 PM   #34 
        - Reich couldn't get confirmed? I believe he'd be able to with no problem.  blm   Nov-25-08 03:37 PM   #35 
           - You probably are right on that  Shiver   Nov-25-08 03:53 PM   #36 
  - What??  high density   Nov-25-08 01:07 PM   #22 
     - Why choose those who have been so wrong while ignoring the qualified who were so right?  blm   Nov-25-08 03:21 PM   #30 
  - I agree.  girl gone mad   Nov-25-08 04:41 PM   #38 
  - Unfortunately, just about everyone in any level of government or Wall Street  Occam Bandage   Nov-25-08 12:03 PM   #3 
  - not mary bain and the other woman...why not bain for SOT?  amborin   Nov-25-08 12:05 PM   #5 
     - Do you know if she was even interested in the position?  ellacott   Nov-25-08 12:10 PM   #8 
  - Here, freaking, here. Are B's picks the voice of the corporate masters?  Metta   Nov-25-08 12:08 PM   #6 
  - Where was the NYT objecting when Bush was crafting his  FrenchieCat   Nov-25-08 12:17 PM   #9 
  - I laugh when the rightwingers say the NYT is liberal. We owe the Iraq war to Judy Miller and her  LittleApple81   Nov-25-08 12:20 PM   #11 
  - Wrong! The NYT took a very critical stance toward Bush's appointments: here's a small sample:  amborin   Nov-25-08 12:43 PM   #18 
  - The NYT DID object STRONGLY to Bush's Picks: here's some examples:  amborin   Nov-25-08 12:46 PM   #20 
  - more bad news on Geithner: from The Nation:  amborin   Nov-25-08 12:18 PM   #10 
  - "Both served in the Clinton Treasury Department"  ProSense   Nov-25-08 12:21 PM   #13 
  - The New York (years behind) times  FrenchieCat   Nov-25-08 12:29 PM   #15 
     - They'll have to stand in line behind The Nation and behind the panel  sfexpat2000   Nov-25-08 12:30 PM   #16 
     - why bash the NYT? it's been a consistent critic of Bush  amborin   Nov-25-08 12:44 PM   #19 
  - You arent going to find someone suitable who didnt have a hand in this crisis  lessthanjake1234   Nov-25-08 12:35 PM   #17 
  - Ah, so the NYT tells us that the crisis is not Bush's fault...  high density   Nov-25-08 01:02 PM   #21 
  - Nonetheless, Obama needs to replace these two. (nt)  w4rma   Nov-25-08 01:31 PM   #23 
  - He's just appointed them, so that's not going to happen  high density   Nov-25-08 01:36 PM   #25 
  - the NYT has NEVER said that; on the contrary  amborin   Nov-25-08 01:34 PM   #24 
  - How dare the New York Times print such "shrill" and "hysterical" opinions.  PassingFair   Nov-25-08 01:37 PM   #26 
  - No one is happy with every pick. I like Geithner, dislike Summers  Jennicut   Nov-25-08 01:52 PM   #27 
  - Here's one way to look at it FWIW  butlerd   Nov-25-08 02:04 PM   #28 
  - This is a pretty shitty piece. Geithner has helped prevent the whole thing from collapsing.  Zynx   Nov-25-08 03:23 PM   #31 
  - It makes no sense why Obama is picking them  brentspeak   Nov-25-08 04:31 PM   #37 
  - NYT played a central role in Whitewater and Iraq  Jeff In Milwaukee   Nov-25-08 05:12 PM   #39 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC