You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #201: Which "other candidates have now been raised from the short list in her stead?" [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-30-08 11:39 PM
Response to Original message
201. Which "other candidates have now been raised from the short list in her stead?"
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Hillary Clinton ineligible for SOS under Emolument Clause announcement to come late Friday Boz  Nov-24-08 06:29 PM   #0 
  - ....  prodn2000   Nov-24-08 06:29 PM   #1 
  - Laws are for little people.  dailykoff   Nov-24-08 06:30 PM   # 
  - "The Constitution is just a goddamn piece of paper."  AtomicKitten   Nov-24-08 07:16 PM   #47 
     - fail.  NoodleBoy   Nov-30-08 08:27 PM   #200 
  - Not having my copy of the Constitution right at hand, I would appreciate  Jackpine Radical   Nov-24-08 06:30 PM   #2 
  - It has to do with the conferring of noble titles and gifts from foreign heads of state.  Zynx   Nov-24-08 06:33 PM   #10 
  - Sorry but although I don't want Hillary to be SOS, this is NOT a valid reason to prevent it.  ddeclue   Nov-24-08 07:47 PM   #55 
  - Its not my reading Im just relaying information from a source, There were two points that failed  Boz   Nov-24-08 09:12 PM   #73 
     - There IS no merit because it requires a total misreading of the  ddeclue   Nov-24-08 09:19 PM   #79 
     - "a source"?  Terran   Nov-25-08 09:04 AM   #150 
     - A link to the "source"  prodn2000   Nov-25-08 10:56 AM   #164 
        - Arianna Huffington is a sexist  mkultra   Dec-01-08 10:24 AM   #215 
     - What's your source? nt  mycritters2   Nov-25-08 11:48 AM   #178 
  - OPERATIVE PHRASE that debunks this: "and no person HOLDING any office "  ddeclue   Nov-24-08 10:22 PM   #121 
     - Correct, here is a link to the exact wording of Section 9, clause 8 ...  mcg   Nov-25-08 01:49 PM   #181 
  - FWIW  JeffR   Nov-24-08 06:34 PM   #14 
  - Are you Kreskin? or are there links for this?...n/t  MPK   Nov-24-08 06:31 PM   #3 
  - Link?  villager   Nov-24-08 06:31 PM   #4 
  - ?  vanderRock   Nov-24-08 06:31 PM   #5 
  - Did the psychic friends network tell you that? nt  onehandle   Nov-24-08 06:32 PM   #6 
  - Looks more like  polmaven   Nov-24-08 09:56 PM   #111 
  - A link would be nice.  Kdillard   Nov-24-08 06:32 PM   #7 
  - Cool info, but how the hell do you know this?  HughMoran   Nov-24-08 06:33 PM   #8 
  - An inside source who has proven to be well connected in the past.  Boz   Nov-24-08 09:15 PM   #75 
     - maybe your source was well connected in the past. But they're not this time  onenote   Nov-24-08 09:48 PM   #103 
     - Well your anonymous sources have never failed me before  theboss   Nov-25-08 09:28 AM   #158 
     - What does this "inside source" say today, Boz?  PeaceNikki   Dec-01-08 06:28 AM   #204 
  - From wiki:  elleng   Nov-24-08 06:33 PM   #9 
  - Oh. Ha ha.  MPK   Nov-24-08 06:35 PM   #16 
  - This does NOT make her ineligible!  trayfoot   Nov-24-08 07:42 PM   #51 
     - Right. Someone's b.s.  elleng   Nov-24-08 07:49 PM   #57 
     - That was point one, that was waiverable by congress as in Nixon/Saxbe  Boz   Nov-24-08 09:16 PM   #77 
  - lulz  Bornaginhooligan   Nov-24-08 06:34 PM   #11 
  - sounds like freepers trying to say Obama isn't eligible for the presidency  wyldwolf   Nov-24-08 06:34 PM   #12 
  - Strangely familiar...  prodn2000   Nov-24-08 06:35 PM   #19 
  - Well, where do you think I read about this in the first place?  Beacool   Nov-24-08 09:39 PM   #98 
  - It is not only the Clintons.  tekisui   Nov-25-08 07:42 AM   #134 
  - yup, this is the new freeperville.  mkultra   Dec-01-08 10:27 AM   #216 
  - uh...what?  senseandsensibility   Nov-24-08 06:34 PM   #13 
  - Emoluments help moisturize dry skin.  BlueDogDemocratNH   Nov-24-08 06:37 PM   #21 
     - Now we're cooking with gas  HughMoran   Nov-24-08 06:42 PM   # 
     - Oh now I get it  senseandsensibility   Nov-24-08 06:42 PM   #28 
     - Yep. Those oily smudges on the glass ceiling were left by the Avon lady.  gkhouston   Nov-25-08 02:02 PM   #182 
  - C'mon, a few of us have asked and I'll add to that list  rvablue   Nov-24-08 06:35 PM   #15 
  - Neither it is information from a person close to the inside, who has proven to be in the know in the  Boz   Nov-24-08 09:17 PM   #78 
     - pssst  happychatter   Nov-25-08 12:36 AM   #126 
     - Well, I guess your info  senseandsensibility   Nov-26-08 12:26 PM   #184 
     - Oh Yeah? Well the evil monkey in my closet says different. n/t  LibFromWV   Nov-29-08 07:43 AM   #188 
  - Just so the rest of you don't have to...  Warren Stupidity   Nov-24-08 06:35 PM   #17 
  - Quite right, Warren No Stupidity!  elleng   Nov-24-08 06:39 PM   #26 
  - Wash. Post: Hillary Clinton's Fix  mcg   Nov-24-08 07:03 PM   #45 
  - The current term of the senate ends before Jan 1.  Warren Stupidity   Nov-25-08 06:32 AM   #128 
     - Her current term in the Senate will not end before Jan 1.  mcg   Nov-25-08 01:20 PM   #180 
  - Good thing I'm not a constitutional lawyer. Whey doesn't the second one apply?  pampango   Nov-25-08 07:40 AM   #133 
     - It's a bastardized the meaning of it.  PeaceNikki   Nov-25-08 08:55 AM   #146 
  - The lat person who went on about the Emolument Clause...  BlueDogDemocratNH   Nov-24-08 06:35 PM   #18 
  - Dale Gribble . lol. nt  sufrommich   Nov-24-08 06:37 PM   #20 
  - I'm sure those who've voted for this did so to embarass DU  wyldwolf   Nov-24-08 06:37 PM   #22 
  - 5 recs - friggin' unbelievable  emilyg   Nov-24-08 06:37 PM   #23 
  - Who knows? Some may have thought it was satire. I thought it was for a few seconds.  Mass   Nov-24-08 06:39 PM   #25 
  - some of these are just joke-trolls  Warren Stupidity   Nov-24-08 06:42 PM   #29 
  - Was she knighted by the Queen or what?\nt  Mass   Nov-24-08 06:37 PM   #24 
  - She received skin care products from a foreign government?  BlueDogDemocratNH   Nov-24-08 06:41 PM   #27 
     - Anointed a drama queen?  Jackpine Radical   Nov-24-08 06:43 PM   #31 
     - Oh, you are BAD!  scarletwoman   Nov-24-08 06:50 PM   #37 
     - She wasn't annointed. She's a natural born drama queen. n/t  Unbowed   Nov-24-08 08:29 PM   #66 
        - I assume the anointment would have merely been a recognition of  Jackpine Radical   Nov-24-08 09:37 PM   #94 
     - And then proceeded to rub some of them the wrong way...  scarletwoman   Nov-24-08 06:51 PM   #40 
     - Let's just hope those charges don't stick  Wednesdays   Nov-24-08 08:19 PM   #65 
     - ...which may explain a lot about Bill & Monica.  Jackpine Radical   Nov-24-08 09:37 PM   #95 
     - *best of* - no text  happychatter   Nov-25-08 12:23 AM   #124 
  - CALL CLARENCE THOMAS RIGHT FUCKING NOW!!!!11!!!!11!!  prodn2000   Nov-24-08 06:43 PM   #30 
  - I'm finally starting to become seriously pissed off at the Hillary threads.  OnceUponTimeOnTheNet   Nov-24-08 06:43 PM   #32 
  - Almost six months ago, Skinner announced that primary warriors who couldn't let go  QC   Nov-24-08 06:46 PM   #35 
  - if only we could be so lucky  wyldwolf   Nov-24-08 07:36 PM   #50 
  - She's being dragged through the lotion. n/t  greguganus   Nov-25-08 09:08 AM   #154 
  - Gold Bond Lotion ineligible for official White House endorsement under Emollient Clause.  QC   Nov-24-08 06:44 PM   #33 
  - Are you sure that isn't the Unguent clause?  Juniperx   Nov-24-08 06:46 PM   #34 
     - I think we're heading down a slippery slope here...  scarletwoman   Nov-24-08 06:54 PM   #42 
        - *SNORT*  Juniperx   Nov-24-08 07:00 PM   #44 
        - LOL!  No Elephants   Nov-25-08 11:32 AM   #169 
  - So what emolument did HRC receive???????  longship   Nov-24-08 06:48 PM   #36 
  - Oil of Olay. It contains a mysterious beauty fluid. n/t  QC   Nov-24-08 06:50 PM   #39 
  - ancient Chinese secret, eh?  Skip Intro   Nov-24-08 07:49 PM   #58 
     - Nah, just mineral oil. n/t  QC   Nov-24-08 07:52 PM   #62 
        - Diabolical! But I thought that stuff was not for infernal use.  Jackpine Radical   Nov-24-08 09:40 PM   #99 
  - The first point was a technicallity and can be waived by congress and prrobably would have  Boz   Nov-24-08 09:21 PM   #81 
     - New York is not a "community property state"  prodn2000   Nov-24-08 09:25 PM   #84 
        - Again, not my debate, just reporting why she was removed from consideration  Boz   Nov-24-08 09:32 PM   #89 
           - LOL  prodn2000   Nov-24-08 09:49 PM   #104 
  - Anyway, good one.  dailykoff   Nov-24-08 06:50 PM   #38 
  - Jeff Rense, is that you?  Jim Sagle   Nov-24-08 06:53 PM   #41 
  - Omg, he's gone grey~  OnceUponTimeOnTheNet   Nov-24-08 07:17 PM   #48 
     - His UFO handlers must've sucked the blood right out of his scalp.  Jim Sagle   Nov-24-08 09:24 PM   #83 
  - "Emoluments," Clinton, and That Pesky Constitution  ProSense   Nov-24-08 06:57 PM   #43 
  - Are you arguing that Obama is seeking to undermine the US constitution?  Skip Intro   Nov-24-08 07:44 PM   #52 
  - Yes, that's exactly what I'm doing. n/t  ProSense   Nov-24-08 07:47 PM   #53 
     - ok. nt  Skip Intro   Nov-24-08 07:49 PM   #56 
     - LOL!  wyldwolf   Nov-24-08 07:51 PM   #60 
  - It's an awful stretch to interpret it that way.  PeaceNikki   Nov-25-08 08:57 AM   #148 
  - Why was this clause put into the constitution and wouldn't there be lots  Kaylee   Nov-24-08 07:11 PM   #46 
  - This will not be an impediment. Congress can fix the law quick  beachmom   Nov-24-08 07:17 PM   #49 
  - They cannot "fix" the law, but they can make and adjustment as was made in Nixon/Saxbe  Boz   Nov-24-08 09:25 PM   #85 
  - Oh, if only this was true, but I don't believe in miricles or Santa Claus. n/t  wisteria   Nov-24-08 07:47 PM   #54 
  - Somebody get this to Clarence Thomas.  rug   Nov-24-08 07:51 PM   #59 
  - See post #30  prodn2000   Nov-24-08 08:48 PM   #67 
     - Ooops.  rug   Nov-24-08 08:58 PM   #71 
  - BS.  DCBob   Nov-24-08 07:52 PM   #61 
  - Your Source must be Oscar Mayer  itsrobert   Nov-24-08 07:53 PM   #63 
  - Now that was funny!!!  Beacool   Nov-24-08 09:51 PM   #105 
  - I thought for a minute they were going to post a weiner/lotion joke. n/t  greguganus   Nov-25-08 09:11 AM   #155 
  - is that john mayer's brother?  mkultra   Dec-01-08 10:28 AM   #217 
  - Notice "Boz" skipped town after posting this nonsense.  DCBob   Nov-24-08 08:19 PM   #64 
  - And 9 recs  prodn2000   Nov-24-08 08:49 PM   #68 
  - Call the humor police. Bring out the humor patrol.  Bornaginhooligan   Nov-24-08 08:50 PM   #69 
  - Didn't skip, just not sitting here watching the thread.  Boz   Nov-24-08 09:23 PM   #82 
  - As in other similar cases the situation is remedied by reducing the SOS salary.  grantcart   Nov-24-08 08:57 PM   #70 
  - The first part can and has been fixed as in Nixon/Saxbe, the second part has no such remedy  Boz   Nov-24-08 09:27 PM   #86 
     - The second part that you refer to makes no extension, as you put it, to the spouse  grantcart   Nov-25-08 12:17 AM   #123 
  - This could be why Bill Richardson was not announced (as expected) this morning  Sebastian Doyle   Nov-24-08 09:01 PM   #72 
  - !  prodn2000   Nov-24-08 09:13 PM   #74 
  - It is related.  Boz   Nov-24-08 09:28 PM   #87 
  - Hillary Clinton's Emoluments Problem  ProSense   Nov-24-08 09:16 PM   #76 
  - For part one, as in Nixon/Saxbe, the second part has no such remedy.  Boz   Nov-24-08 09:31 PM   #88 
  - It is not even THAT.. it is a willful MISreading of the Constitution  ddeclue   Nov-24-08 09:34 PM   #92 
  - I m only reporting why she was removed fom consideration, that it was ethics related to that clause  Boz   Nov-24-08 09:39 PM   #97 
  - I don't know where you are getting this because it simply isn't a  ddeclue   Nov-24-08 09:44 PM   #100 
  - "I've made a quite clear case to refute the basis of your argument", NOT MY ARGUMENT  Boz   Nov-24-08 09:54 PM   #108 
     - That's It!!!11!!  prodn2000   Nov-24-08 09:56 PM   #110 
     - Well again the argument does not hold water...  ddeclue   Nov-24-08 09:58 PM   #112 
     - relaying info from whom?  CreekDog   Nov-25-08 08:56 AM   #147 
     - ...  prodn2000   Nov-25-08 10:57 AM   #165 
     - You wipe your but with the constitution to try and block hillary!  mkultra   Dec-01-08 10:54 AM   #219 
  - there is no link.... no substantiation for your assertion that she was removed  happychatter   Nov-25-08 12:26 AM   #125 
  - You know, I can make stuff up and start an OP declaring it, too  LostinVA   Nov-25-08 07:30 AM   #131 
  - Tell that to  ProSense   Nov-24-08 09:54 PM   #107 
     - That was the part one, which was waiverable as in Nixon/Saxbe, it was the second part that removed  Boz   Nov-24-08 09:58 PM   #113 
        - This is a statute not the Constitution which was what you were citing as the disqualification..  ddeclue   Nov-24-08 10:00 PM   #114 
  - This reminds me of "it all depends what the meaning of the word 'is' is"n/t  greguganus   Nov-25-08 09:15 AM   #156 
  - Congress can rescind the pay raise to allow Hillary to become SOS  IndianaGreen   Nov-24-08 09:20 PM   #80 
  - As in Nixon/Saxbe, but the second part has no such waiverable action by congress  Boz   Nov-24-08 09:33 PM   #91 
  - That would be great, but I was just getting used to the idea of her being stuck in a cabinet post...  JVS   Nov-24-08 09:33 PM   #90 
  - Yah/ And moreover the OP sounds EXACTLY like freepers with their birth certificate crap....  BlooInBloo   Nov-24-08 09:38 PM   #96 
     - Calling someone a freeper for bringing bad news, is how circular firing squads begin,  Boz   Nov-24-08 09:45 PM   #101 
     - Lemme guess: The story will break everywhere in "24 business hours"?  BlooInBloo   Nov-24-08 09:47 PM   #102 
     - you aren't a freeper. but you're pretty gullible if you believe your "source" on this  onenote   Nov-24-08 09:52 PM   #106 
     - it speaks.  Veganistan   Nov-24-08 10:10 PM   #118 
     - you don't have a "source"  hileeopnyn8d   Nov-25-08 09:04 AM   #152 
        - Good find  LostinVA   Nov-25-08 09:46 AM   #160 
        - Oh no you d'int  cboy4   Nov-25-08 10:40 AM   #162 
     - you obviously mean bill richardson  mkultra   Dec-01-08 10:32 AM   #218 
  - ...in your mind?  rucky   Nov-24-08 09:36 PM   #93 
  - What is "the second part"?  Unsane   Nov-24-08 09:55 PM   #109 
  - The part right after the first part ?  SaveOurDemocracy   Nov-24-08 10:04 PM   #115 
     - The OP keeps mentioning "the second part," but won't write what the hell it is.  Unsane   Nov-24-08 10:09 PM   #117 
        - Its in the OP, the first part was Section 6, the second part is related to Bill Clinton and  Boz   Nov-24-08 10:20 PM   #120 
           - Any idea who'll "replace" her?  Unsane   Nov-24-08 10:22 PM   #122 
           - Ridiculous...  S_E_Fudd   Nov-25-08 08:29 AM   #142 
  - And then Obama will be out because of the natural born citizen clause  GoesTo11   Nov-24-08 10:09 PM   #116 
  - I believe the part about Hillary using Emoluments (ie. Oil of Olay)....  Blackhatjack   Nov-24-08 10:12 PM   #119 
  - When this fantasy reaches climax, Palin will be President and Democrats will be in the Camps - nt  happychatter   Nov-25-08 12:39 AM   #127 
  - tortured logic  H2O Man   Nov-25-08 06:36 AM   #129 
  - Article 1, Section 9, Clause 8  S_E_Fudd   Nov-25-08 07:26 AM   #130 
  - You copied and pasted this directly from Free Republic, didn't you?  PeaceNikki   Nov-25-08 07:37 AM   #132 
  - It's apparently ALL OVER the RW sites  LostinVA   Nov-25-08 07:43 AM   #135 
  - huh. Color me shocked.  PeaceNikki   Nov-25-08 08:04 AM   #138 
  - I believe that post #17 above was copied and pasted from the Constitution.  pampango   Nov-25-08 08:13 AM   #139 
     - Find a crediible source that discusses this.  PeaceNikki   Nov-25-08 08:16 AM   #141 
     - Why? We can't discuss issues that aren't validated by "credible" (in the eye of the beholder)  pampango   Nov-25-08 08:42 AM   #144 
        - OK, here  PeaceNikki   Nov-25-08 08:48 AM   #145 
           - Thanks.  pampango   Nov-25-08 09:03 AM   #149 
              - I repeat, it's a stupid conspiracy parroted by right-wingers  PeaceNikki   Nov-25-08 09:04 AM   #153 
                 - I repeat, I hope you're right though Saxbe (if he's still alive) might not agree.  pampango   Nov-25-08 09:18 AM   #157 
     - but which constitution?  mkultra   Dec-01-08 10:57 AM   #220 
  - bet ten bucks hil is the next SOS. n/t.  okieinpain   Nov-25-08 07:51 AM   #136 
  - Boz, you are an idiot. And I try to avoid personal attacks.  moriah   Nov-25-08 07:53 AM   #137 
  - Is there something in the water that makes Hard Left & Hard Right crazy on birth certificates?  RollWithIt   Nov-25-08 08:13 AM   #140 
  - Remember that this clause will apply to all Obama picks  PeaceNikki   Nov-25-08 08:31 AM   #143 
  - HUGH  JVS   Nov-25-08 09:04 AM   #151 
  - well IF (big if) it's true, I'm ok with it. That means she'll be staying in the senate! :)  comtec   Nov-25-08 09:43 AM   #159 
  - Hillary can resign her senate seat and THEN be appointed and confirmed..........case closed. nt  suston96   Nov-25-08 10:13 AM   #161 
  - 1500 bodies hanging in trees!! Oops....  pecwae   Nov-25-08 10:53 AM   #163 
  - Well, we'll know by Friday, won't we.  PassingFair   Nov-25-08 11:11 AM   #166 
  - Waiveable.  demokatgurrl   Nov-25-08 11:12 AM   #167 
  - Source? Sounds like some Rightwing radio nonsense.  TexasObserver   Nov-25-08 11:23 AM   #168 
  - Obama is a Constitutional Lawyer  ObamaVision   Nov-25-08 11:33 AM   #170 
  - I said that upthread and in another thread, too -- no one acknowledges it!  LostinVA   Nov-25-08 11:36 AM   #172 
     - I don't even know what this Emolument Clause stuff is all about  ObamaVision   Nov-25-08 11:43 AM   #176 
        - And they are all lawyers  LostinVA   Nov-25-08 11:44 AM   #177 
           - Exactly!  ObamaVision   Nov-25-08 11:54 AM   #179 
  - Ahahahahaha. Hahahaha. Hahahahahahahaha. *gasp*  Occam Bandage   Nov-25-08 11:35 AM   #171 
  - you are drunk with your hatred for Hillary  mkultra   Dec-01-08 10:58 AM   #221 
  - Where does the  No Elephants   Nov-25-08 11:37 AM   #173 
  - Ever notice it's never lawyers or law professors arguing these points?  TexasObserver   Nov-25-08 11:37 AM   #174 
  - First Point: Your OP Is 100% Wrong. Second Point: Your Source Is Incredibly Dumb.  OPERATIONMINDCRIME   Nov-25-08 11:39 AM   #175 
  - And forth point: AHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!! PWNED!@  mkultra   Dec-01-08 10:59 AM   #223 
  - I want to know who the 16 geniuses are who recommended this...  Stand and Fight   Nov-25-08 10:37 PM   #183 
  - I bet if I guessed who did, I would score somewhere in the range of 85-95%  prodn2000   Nov-26-08 01:02 PM   #185 
  - Hey, it's Saturday. This "announcement" never happened.  PeaceNikki   Nov-29-08 07:30 AM   #186 
  - The OP is like the rapture--it will come some day. NOT  atimetocome   Nov-29-08 07:40 AM   #187 
  - Hey, he never said which Friday!  Occam Bandage   Nov-29-08 10:39 AM   #193 
  - Friday has come and gone...  S_E_Fudd   Nov-29-08 08:58 AM   #189 
  - Hillary's appointment will come Monday, probably  wyldwolf   Nov-29-08 09:00 AM   #190 
  - I think so too...  S_E_Fudd   Nov-29-08 10:01 AM   #192 
  - I'd like to see what Boz's "inside sources" have to say.  PeaceNikki   Nov-29-08 09:11 AM   #191 
  - Where's the beef?  HughMoran   Nov-30-08 12:00 PM   #194 
  - dupe  Zombie2   Nov-30-08 12:01 PM   # 
  - Why the Hillary hate, HughMoran??  Zombie2   Nov-30-08 12:01 PM   #195 
  - Looks like you are going to find new sources  prodn2000   Nov-30-08 02:55 PM   #196 
  - Punked. n/t  mountainvue   Nov-30-08 03:14 PM   #197 
  - what other tips do those "sources" have for you?  onenote   Nov-30-08 03:48 PM   #198 
  - Yes, Winguts, Hillary Can be Secretary of State  charlyvi   Nov-30-08 07:15 PM   #199 
  - Which "other candidates have now been raised from the short list in her stead?"  Freddie Stubbs   Nov-30-08 11:39 PM   #201 
  - How's this workin' for ya?  WinkyDink   Dec-01-08 12:05 AM   #202 
  - The announcement is coming in a few hours. Looks like vetting of the Clintons went well in the end.  Hekate   Dec-01-08 02:43 AM   #203 
  - Evil monkey in closet 1, Boz 0 n/t  LibFromWV   Dec-01-08 06:32 AM   #205 
  - There She Is!!!  prodn2000   Dec-01-08 09:44 AM   #206 
  - Guess not  Autumn   Dec-01-08 09:50 AM   #207 
  - Hey Boz.... how's your Monday goin'?  PeaceNikki   Dec-01-08 09:53 AM   #208 
  - someone had better post a missing persons alert for boz  onenote   Dec-01-08 09:56 AM   #210 
     - I agree. I am very concerned.  prodn2000   Dec-01-08 12:15 PM   #227 
  - I think your source better go to this thread ASAP  LostinVA   Dec-01-08 09:54 AM   #209 
  - Oh no, someone forgot to tell our president elect about this...  kiva   Dec-01-08 09:58 AM   #211 
  - This OP is EPIC!  SIMPLYB1980   Dec-01-08 10:01 AM   #212 
  - Reminds me of this one  NoPasaran   Dec-01-08 12:14 PM   #226 
  - **** BOZ, WHERE ARE YOU!!?!??!?! ****  PeaceNikki   Dec-01-08 10:12 AM   #213 
  - Probably pulling something else  ronnykmarshall   Dec-01-08 11:49 AM   #224 
  - You must not have any faith in Obama do you?  ronnykmarshall   Dec-01-08 10:21 AM   #214 
  - Come out, come out wherever you are...nt  S_E_Fudd   Dec-01-08 10:58 AM   #222 
  - Hey Boz, is your "source" pulling his hair out right about now?  Beacool   Dec-01-08 11:53 AM   #225 
  - I'm locking this  mvd   Dec-01-08 12:16 PM   #228 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC