CreekDog
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-23-08 01:37 AM
Response to Original message |
|
I find the disagreement on the Gloria Estefan thing unacceptable! 
|
| -Should we, as Democrats, be in lockstep? Yes or No? |
political_Dem |
Nov-23-08 01:19 AM |
#0 |
-
No, we shouldnt, but its suspect when some people bitch about literally everything. |
hnmnf |
Nov-23-08 01:20 AM |
#1 |
 -
How so? |
political_Dem |
Nov-23-08 01:21 AM |
#2 |
-
Certain people on DU have complained about every pick Obama has made |
hnmnf |
Nov-23-08 01:24 AM |
#5 |
-
Do you expect them to just be quiet about their dissent? |
political_Dem |
Nov-23-08 01:27 AM |
#7 |
 -
No, but these people have judged Obama's presidency before he spent a day in office |
hnmnf |
Nov-23-08 01:28 AM |
#10 |
-
I agree with you about some of the folks who are the hand-wringers. |
political_Dem |
Nov-23-08 01:31 AM |
#13 |
-
it's a fine line. Some people do sow doubt and fear when it's not helpful. |
Voice for Peace |
Nov-23-08 08:33 AM |
#79 |
-
the only choices aren't Kucinich or the DLC sellouts--and what the hell is wrong with Kucinich? |
yurbud |
Nov-23-08 01:29 AM |
#11 |
 -
There you go. Who said Obama appointment of Hillary was made? |
Life Long Dem |
Nov-23-08 01:48 AM |
#23 |
-
I don't think anyone has |
Two Americas |
Nov-23-08 03:10 AM |
#46 |
-
I haven't complained at all about Obama's picks, but I'm going to complain about YOUR |
1monster |
Nov-23-08 09:16 AM |
#89 |
 -
Indeed. Dennis deserves no one's contempt. |
Ken Burch |
Dec-03-08 04:58 PM |
#120 |
-
so. let them bitch. shutting up discussion is bullshit. nothing anyone |
roguevalley |
Nov-23-08 12:31 PM |
#97 |
-
Nope, but we must be able to discern "Concern!" from concern |
prodn2000 |
Nov-23-08 01:22 AM |
#3 |
 -
How would you do that? |
political_Dem |
Nov-23-08 01:24 AM |
#4 |
-
Prima facie is a useful tool |
prodn2000 |
Nov-23-08 01:30 AM |
#12 |
-
Using the old adage of "hindsight being 20/20 " could be even better. |
political_Dem |
Nov-23-08 01:35 AM |
#14 |
-
I am really happy with my political party |
prodn2000 |
Nov-23-08 01:37 AM |
#16 |
-
So am I. I am even estatic that the man I voted for is business-like, efficient and very organized. |
political_Dem |
Nov-23-08 01:42 AM |
#20 |
-
In complete agreement. Lockstep=worship |
prodn2000 |
Nov-23-08 01:43 AM |
#21 |
-
No, I figured it all out today: |
napoleon_in_rags |
Nov-23-08 01:24 AM |
#6 |
 -
Where does dissent fit into that realm of thought? |
political_Dem |
Nov-23-08 01:28 AM |
#9 |
-
It fits in as an important part of the process. |
napoleon_in_rags |
Nov-23-08 11:50 PM |
#110 |
-
No. Never. |
emilyg |
Nov-23-08 01:28 AM |
#8 |
-
Absolutely |
CreekDog |
Nov-23-08 01:37 AM |
#15 |
 -
Don't you mean Gloria Estephan? Estephen? Eserphone? |
prodn2000 |
Nov-23-08 01:38 AM |
#17 |
 -
LOL. |
political_Dem |
Nov-23-08 01:38 AM |
#18 |
-
Doesn't matter if we should. We're not. |
Jim Sagle |
Nov-23-08 01:41 AM |
#19 |
 -
Then why are there instances of trying to get people to be silent about their dissent? |
political_Dem |
Nov-23-08 01:44 AM |
#22 |
-
But we aren't really a party of leftist. There is a broad spectrum |
sufrommich |
Nov-23-08 07:04 AM |
#73 |
-
No one is trying to get others to be quite. They are just disagreeing. |
tekisui |
Nov-23-08 08:23 AM |
#78 |
-
"why is there a push toward centrist and center-right paradigms? " |
Jim Sagle |
Nov-24-08 02:36 AM |
#115 |
-
No, but some level of cohesion and a unified front would be cool |
TheKentuckian |
Nov-23-08 01:51 AM |
#24 |
 -
There are going to be some people who are rather nervous about all these changes. |
political_Dem |
Nov-23-08 02:01 AM |
#26 |
-
push.fucking.poll |
FrenchieCat |
Nov-23-08 01:59 AM |
#25 |
 -
This is more of a rhetorical question. |
political_Dem |
Nov-23-08 02:03 AM |
#27 |
  -
And you got your answer. |
last1standing |
Nov-23-08 02:04 AM |
#29 |
 -
It is pretty sad. |
political_Dem |
Nov-23-08 02:05 AM |
#30 |
 -
My glimmer of hope seems to dwindle every time I visit this site lately. |
last1standing |
Nov-23-08 02:15 AM |
#31 |
 -
My take on this. |
political_Dem |
Nov-23-08 02:48 AM |
#41 |
  -
Very well put. |
last1standing |
Nov-23-08 03:20 AM |
#49 |
   -
Thanks and no problem. |
political_Dem |
Nov-23-08 03:34 AM |
#55 |
  -
I think we all should be in lock-step when it comes to MSM. |
Life Long Dem |
Nov-23-08 03:42 AM |
#60 |
 -
I agree. Because the messages concerning progressive/liberal values have to be re-introduced. |
political_Dem |
Nov-23-08 03:51 AM |
#61 |
 -
It's all a rating's game to MSM. |
Life Long Dem |
Nov-23-08 05:11 AM |
#66 |
 -
I stopped posting after the 2004 election |
illuminaughty |
Nov-23-08 03:12 AM |
#47 |
 -
Agreed. |
last1standing |
Nov-23-08 03:22 AM |
#50 |
 -
I would certainly hope so. |
political_Dem |
Nov-23-08 03:36 AM |
#58 |
 -
Why do you object to people expressing their views, FrenchieCat? |
last1standing |
Nov-23-08 02:04 AM |
#28 |
-
Dissatisfied.....? |
FrenchieCat |
Nov-23-08 02:22 AM |
#34 |
-
Are you the judge of superficial, impatient, petty, and shortsightedness? |
last1standing |
Nov-23-08 02:26 AM |
#35 |
 -
I'm as much of a judge as you are....... |
FrenchieCat |
Nov-23-08 02:29 AM |
#36 |
-
I asked a question, you passed judgment. |
last1standing |
Nov-23-08 02:33 AM |
#37 |
-
Don't think so. |
FrenchieCat |
Nov-23-08 02:46 AM |
#40 |
 -
Oh Frenchie, nothing you say could be so low as to surprise me. |
last1standing |
Nov-23-08 03:03 AM |
#44 |
-
Just because you call something a fact doesn't mean it is a fact (or remotely resembles one) |
zlt234 |
Nov-23-08 03:25 AM |
#51 |
 -
Thanks for your opinion. |
last1standing |
Nov-23-08 03:34 AM |
#56 |
-
Let me break it down so that even you can understand...... |
FrenchieCat |
Nov-23-08 03:29 AM |
#52 |
-
So much for suggesting mutual respect. |
last1standing |
Nov-23-08 03:32 AM |
#54 |
-
Excellent! |
FrenchieCat |
Nov-23-08 03:35 AM |
#57 |
-
And stop screaming at the cat! I'm pretty sure it doesn't even CARE who Obama appoints. |
Ken Burch |
Dec-03-08 09:50 PM |
#127 |
-
At least I have "IF" Obama does this or that in my rants. |
Life Long Dem |
Nov-23-08 02:58 AM |
#43 |
-
What about those who didn't vote for Obama? |
Milo_Bloom |
Dec-04-08 11:06 AM |
#134 |
-
No to lockstepping, |
Undercurrent |
Nov-23-08 02:18 AM |
#32 |
-
Oh, hell to the NO! |
meowomon |
Nov-23-08 02:20 AM |
#33 |
-
Straw man. No one is demanding any such thing. |
cali |
Nov-23-08 02:34 AM |
#38 |
 -
What would you call it then? |
political_Dem |
Nov-23-08 02:37 AM |
#39 |
  -
Yes to the first question and no to the second. |
cali |
Nov-23-08 02:57 AM |
#42 |
 -
On the question of irony, it would be ironic for someone to quiet another person |
political_Dem |
Nov-23-08 03:05 AM |
#45 |
 -
ROFL |
Two Americas |
Nov-23-08 03:14 AM |
#48 |
  -
yeah, because that's what I said. NOT. |
cali |
Nov-23-08 03:31 AM |
#53 |
 -
Correct. n/t |
H2O Man |
Nov-23-08 07:09 AM |
#75 |
 -
Agree. nm |
rhett o rick |
Nov-23-08 09:10 AM |
#87 |
-
Never have, |
elleng |
Nov-23-08 03:38 AM |
#59 |
-
Yes, we are BORG. |
TexasObserver |
Nov-23-08 04:19 AM |
#62 |
 -
When does dissent stop from being described as a "conniption fit"? |
political_Dem |
Nov-23-08 04:34 AM |
#63 |
-
When it is rational and sane. |
TexasObserver |
Nov-23-08 05:08 AM |
#65 |
-
I do? How do you figure that? |
political_Dem |
Nov-23-08 06:08 AM |
#68 |
-
Easy. Did you forget to carry the two? |
TexasObserver |
Nov-23-08 06:33 AM |
#71 |
-
I voted for Dems to run the government, not to run my brain. |
agentS |
Nov-23-08 04:53 AM |
#64 |
-
Hell no |
chemp |
Nov-23-08 05:41 AM |
#67 |
-
Nah - we're more like a team of rivals. :) |
polichick |
Nov-23-08 06:23 AM |
#69 |
 -
"best of" responses in this rhetorical, loaded and insulting OP - no text |
happychatter |
Nov-24-08 01:31 AM |
#113 |
-
I'm sorry that you were so offended. |
political_Dem |
Nov-24-08 06:55 AM |
#117 |
-
Not lockstep but at least united and working together for the main goal. |
DCBob |
Nov-23-08 06:29 AM |
#70 |
-
of course not. |
atimetocome |
Nov-23-08 06:48 AM |
#72 |
-
Of course we shouldn't walk in lockstep, but we should be smart enough |
Vinca |
Nov-23-08 07:07 AM |
#74 |
-
Until he actually does some governing, I'd wonder how people are |
Arkana |
Nov-23-08 07:49 AM |
#76 |
-
Look, I've never said we have to be in lockstep. |
Elrond Hubbard |
Nov-23-08 08:05 AM |
#77 |
-
Your view of the Republican party is simplistic and not current, and my answer is No |
slackmaster |
Nov-23-08 08:42 AM |
#80 |
 -
The work of John Dean and Bob Altemeyer is not current enough? |
political_Dem |
Nov-23-08 10:21 AM |
#94 |
-
We should be, as Democrats.. |
stillcool47 |
Nov-23-08 08:46 AM |
#81 |
-
No one ever said that |
treestar |
Nov-23-08 08:48 AM |
#82 |
-
No, but comparing Clinton to Stalin and Pol Pot and identifying as "Independent" due to the SoS pick |
PeaceNikki |
Nov-23-08 08:51 AM |
#83 |
-
Not just NO but HELL NO!!! |
Froward69 |
Nov-23-08 08:59 AM |
#84 |
-
Cute. |
jefferson_dem |
Nov-23-08 09:00 AM |
#85 |
-
Did you actually expect anyone to honestly answer Yes? First we had to get Bush out. |
rhett o rick |
Nov-23-08 09:08 AM |
#86 |
-
Oh, yes. Most definitely. |
gristy |
Nov-23-08 09:11 AM |
#88 |
-
No! We shouldn't be like the Republicans. We should be Democrats that respects all points of view |
Liberal_Stalwart71 |
Nov-23-08 09:17 AM |
#90 |
 -
Thank you, Liberal_Stalwart71. You mentioned one of the points that needed to be said. |
political_Dem |
Nov-23-08 10:19 AM |
#93 |
 -
I too despise the DLC and for some reason people forget what happened in the 90's |
Raineyb |
Nov-23-08 10:56 AM |
#96 |
  -
Exactly, Raineyb. You've said it better than I could. :) |
political_Dem |
Nov-23-08 06:21 PM |
#102 |
 -
For some of them, it's still about 1972. |
Ken Burch |
Dec-03-08 05:03 PM |
#121 |
-
It would be nice at least until we actually see Obama making bad policies |
high density |
Nov-23-08 09:49 AM |
#91 |
-
Ideally yes, but the cost of achieving it would be too great. |
Donald Ian Rankin |
Nov-23-08 10:13 AM |
#92 |
-
Both. Yes and no. |
Gregorian |
Nov-23-08 10:25 AM |
#95 |
-
No |
Uzybone |
Nov-23-08 12:32 PM |
#98 |
-
Aren't we on many issues? Choice, Environmentalism, etc. |
LanternWaste |
Nov-23-08 12:44 PM |
#99 |
-
No, but we should give our nominee at least one day in office |
mzmolly |
Nov-23-08 01:45 PM |
#100 |
-
Yeah, in the congress we can contest congress but Obama is not really in any office at > |
cooolandrew |
Nov-23-08 03:32 PM |
#101 |
-
pD, how the hell could we ever agree on anything? |
old mark |
Nov-23-08 06:32 PM |
#103 |
 -
old mark, I agree. It is part of the whole deal. |
political_Dem |
Nov-23-08 07:07 PM |
#105 |
  -
How boring would all this shit be if we aggreed on everything? |
old mark |
Nov-24-08 06:06 AM |
#116 |
 -
Even the answers in this thread proves that our party is not boring in the least. |
political_Dem |
Nov-24-08 06:58 AM |
#118 |
 -
In the immortal words of the racistly-named Tonto... |
BlooInBloo |
Nov-23-08 07:11 PM |
#107 |
-
No |
bigwillq |
Nov-23-08 06:34 PM |
#104 |
-
Totally. In fact, we should change our names to "nazi", just so DU whiny ass titty babies... |
BlooInBloo |
Nov-23-08 07:09 PM |
#106 |
-
No dissent or ignoring it is what caused our present situtatio.... |
fadedrose |
Nov-23-08 07:18 PM |
#108 |
-
no, yes, No, Yes, NOOOO! |
TexasObserver |
Nov-23-08 07:21 PM |
#109 |
-
Only between the time we choose a nominee... |
Iggo |
Nov-24-08 01:12 AM |
#111 |
-
Less than a month after electoral victory? TWO months before actual Inauguration? |
smalll |
Nov-24-08 01:25 AM |
#112 |
-
Nope |
Breeze54 |
Nov-24-08 01:51 AM |
#114 |
-
I can't get behind Pres Obama on his choice of Larry Summers |
ElsewheresDaughter |
Nov-24-08 07:30 AM |
#119 |
-
Depends |
quakerboy |
Dec-03-08 05:20 PM |
#122 |
-
No, and all of you had best agree. |
Forkboy |
Dec-03-08 06:33 PM |
#123 |
-
This is the internet-forum version of "when did you stop beating your wife", no? |
camera__obscura |
Dec-03-08 06:33 PM |
#124 |
-
Dems NEVER march in lockstep........... |
trayfoot |
Dec-03-08 06:44 PM |
#125 |
-
Should we, as Democrats, constantly be posting straw man arguments? Yes or No? |
zlt234 |
Dec-03-08 06:45 PM |
#126 |
 -
I think the question is posed to say "You know we need to put aside |
harun |
Dec-04-08 11:15 AM |
#135 |
-
never, but we do need to prune some trolls on this board. |
mkultra |
Dec-03-08 10:38 PM |
#128 |
 -
I'm not a troll. |
political_Dem |
Dec-04-08 03:36 AM |
#131 |
-
the idea that people shouldnt express thier distaste for your dissent |
mkultra |
Dec-04-08 11:02 AM |
#132 |
-
Thank you. |
political_Dem |
Dec-04-08 11:16 AM |
#136 |
-
your welcome. so cut it the fuck out. |
mkultra |
Dec-04-08 11:50 AM |
#137 |
-
No. I'll do as I please on this board according to the rules. I don't need your fingerwagging. |
political_Dem |
Dec-04-08 11:59 AM |
#138 |
-
good point, i guess everyone else will to. No silencing for anyone |
mkultra |
Dec-04-08 12:03 PM |
#140 |
-
Should we, as Democrats, complain about absolutely everything on principle? |
Occam Bandage |
Dec-03-08 10:43 PM |
#129 |
-
factionalism is the essence of democracy |
amborin |
Dec-04-08 02:19 AM |
#130 |
-
Of course not. |
Milo_Bloom |
Dec-04-08 11:04 AM |
#133 |
-
For the next four years, yes. |
olkaz |
Dec-04-08 12:00 PM |
#139 |
-
No, but dissent isn't the same thing as sky-is-falling panic |
EstimatedProphet |
Dec-04-08 12:06 PM |
#141 |
-
no, we shouldn't. But, it is what it is, around here. |
Laura PackYourBags |
Dec-04-08 12:06 PM |
#142 |
-
The fact that you give us a choice reveals your bias n/t |
Tom Rinaldo |
Dec-04-08 01:48 PM |
#143 |
-
Maybe (because I refuse to let you lock me into your "yes or no" ideology). n/t |
ieoeja |
Dec-04-08 01:56 PM |
#144 |