You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Reply #15: "We ... must ... not ... question ... authority" "We ... must ... not ... question ... authority" [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
Honeycombe8 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-08 10:12 AM
Response to Reply #3
15. "We ... must ... not ... question ... authority" "We ... must ... not ... question ... authority"
"we ... must ... not ... question ... authority." "We ... must ... not ... question ... authority." "we ... must ... not ... question ... authority." "We ... must ... not ... question ... authority."

And the war with Oceana went on and on and on. No one questioned it.

I'm gonna go out on a limb here and guess....Clinton supporter, right? Any post that even seems to question the Clinton appointment (which this post does not) is not allowed, as heretical.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
  -Richardson may be Commerce Sec'y. It's good he'll be in the cabinet...but I feel sorry for him. indie_ana_500  Nov-22-08 09:50 AM   #0 
  - I think he's over rated myself. I know I should like him, but he just seems so  glowing   Nov-22-08 09:54 AM   #1 
  - Maybe it will gain importance with Obamma's agenda  ellacott   Nov-22-08 09:55 AM   #2 
  - This really does not help  spokane   Nov-22-08 09:56 AM   #3 
  - I agree with you on this. Altho I feel Richardson's fate was sealed more because  CTyankee   Nov-22-08 10:10 AM   #14 
  - My OP was actually a positive one, a caring one. Not at all intended...  indie_ana_500   Nov-22-08 10:18 AM   #19 
  - My response was more in the spirit of "let's move past this." Not to diss you.  CTyankee   Nov-22-08 10:26 AM   #22 
  - You see how you get yourself all twisted up  spokane   Nov-22-08 11:51 AM   #38 
  - If every politician was graded on fidelity, most would fail.  genevat   Nov-22-08 11:08 AM   #32 
  - It still amazes me that the American people want to decide  janx   Nov-22-08 11:10 AM   #33 
     - Washington would be empty if fidelity was the major criteria for getting voted in. lol nt  genevat   Nov-22-08 11:12 AM   #35 
  - I always read about this  LiberalCommiePinko   Nov-22-08 12:21 PM   #39 
  - "We ... must ... not ... question ... authority" "We ... must ... not ... question ... authority"  indie_ana_500   Nov-22-08 10:12 AM   #15 
     - Your limb would be broken  spokane   Nov-22-08 11:39 AM   #37 
  - Commerce is actually a pretty important agency.  ocelot   Nov-22-08 10:00 AM   #4 
  - None of the Departments are minor positions  sandnsea   Nov-22-08 10:03 AM   #8 
  - Its an extremely important appointment... renegotiating nafta  Windy   Nov-22-08 10:14 AM   #17 
  - Don't forget international trade agreements and the Census  Jake3463   Nov-22-08 11:13 AM   #36 
  - Some people just can't let go of the fact that he chose Obama over the Clintons.  Skwmom   Nov-22-08 10:00 AM   #5 
  - Is that what's going on?  janx   Nov-22-08 10:03 AM   #6 
  - What campaign against him? nt  sufrommich   Nov-22-08 10:04 AM   #9 
     - All the Richardson-hate. How could you have missed it?  JVS   Nov-22-08 10:14 AM   #16 
        - Where?? Here on DU? Is that your proof for a  sufrommich   Nov-22-08 10:16 AM   #18 
        - Yes, there are plenty of James "Judas" Carville kindred souls here.  ClarkUSA   Nov-22-08 11:00 AM   #28 
        - I haven't really noticed much Richardson hate  BreatheOnMe   Nov-22-08 11:02 AM   #31 
  - I'd say anything to do with commerce right now will  sufrommich   Nov-22-08 10:03 AM   #7 
  - A lot of people would love to be Commerce Secretary. He's happy to have it  BrentTaylor   Nov-22-08 10:04 AM   #10 
  - I don't consider the post unimportant and I doubt he does either.  Kdillard   Nov-22-08 10:07 AM   #11 
  - Not invisible at all  demokatgurrl   Nov-22-08 10:07 AM   #12 
  - He's got to be disappointed. He wanted VP or SOS.  jesus_of_suburbia   Nov-22-08 10:09 AM   #13 
  - Yes, that's all I meant by my post. I'm not saying he SHOULD'VE been apptd something else.  indie_ana_500   Nov-22-08 10:20 AM   #20 
  - It's clear he wanted as much visibility as possible, but he'll be fine.  Katzenkavalier   Nov-22-08 10:21 AM   #21 
  - In these economic times the Commerce Secretary is extremely visible /nt  still_one   Nov-22-08 10:37 AM   #23 
  - Given this economy, do you really think Commerce is "unimportant"? n/t  emulatorloo   Nov-22-08 10:37 AM   #24 
  - I don't.  MyPetRock   Nov-22-08 10:42 AM   #25 
  - How about your choice of McCain?  BushDespiser12   Nov-22-08 10:47 AM   #26 
     - I voted for Obama.  MyPetRock   Nov-22-08 10:57 AM   #27 
  - You feel sorry for Bill Richardson?  janx   Nov-22-08 11:02 AM   #29 
  - Richardson had a great record for job creation and increased trade sounds  cooolandrew   Nov-22-08 11:02 AM   #30 
  - Trade relations  Jake3463   Nov-22-08 11:12 AM   #34 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC