You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #7: Re 2010: In midterm elections, usually the party NOT in the White House gains. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-08-08 10:28 PM
Response to Original message
7. Re 2010: In midterm elections, usually the party NOT in the White House gains.
We need to fight that trend in 2010.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Did Obama really change the map? Is his coalition sustainable? Whoa20  Nov-08-08 10:19 PM   #0 
  - He did not get 'demolished' in the white vote.  Elrond Hubbard   Nov-08-08 10:20 PM   #1 
  - Not only that -- he got MORE of the white vote than either Kerry, Gore or Bill Clinton.  Blondiegrrl   Nov-08-08 11:09 PM   #20 
  - in 1992, there were  Whoa20   Nov-09-08 12:11 AM   #33 
  - white vote: 55 to 43  fujiyama   Nov-09-08 06:10 AM   #51 
     - South vs non-south white voters are 2 different animals politically  Juche   Nov-09-08 08:21 AM   #59 
  - YES! He's been so built up as a huge bogeyman by conservatives  PretzelWarrior   Nov-08-08 10:20 PM   #2 
  - Naw, it's all over ... we're destroyed ... may as well go on to the next liberal forum  melody   Nov-08-08 10:24 PM   #3 
  - heh  Mayberry Machiavelli   Nov-08-08 10:27 PM   #5 
     - Word  sniffa   Nov-08-08 10:31 PM   #9 
        - Best avatar ever, sniffa!  Mayberry Machiavelli   Nov-08-08 10:55 PM   #15 
  - We (the Democratic Party) need to continue with Dean's 50 State Strategy.  Starlight   Nov-08-08 10:26 PM   #4 
  - Winning while Black.  Mz Pip   Nov-08-08 10:27 PM   #6 
  - I'm sorry, Sir..... you're under....  happychatter   Nov-09-08 05:41 AM   #50 
  - Re 2010: In midterm elections, usually the party NOT in the White House gains.  Eric J in MN   Nov-08-08 10:28 PM   #7 
  - That trend has been lessened in recent years  Marsala   Nov-08-08 11:19 PM   #21 
     - Democrats may be at a ceiling in terms of flipping seats in Congress.  tritsofme   Nov-08-08 11:41 PM   #25 
     - '98 and '02 were anomalies in many ways  fujiyama   Nov-09-08 06:19 AM   #53 
  - He only won 9 red states, including 3 southern ones. Nothing major.  SurferBoy   Nov-08-08 10:30 PM   #8 
  - but did he make permanent  Whoa20   Nov-09-08 12:08 AM   #29 
     - Since when are VA, NC, and IN run of the mill swing states?  hnmnf   Nov-09-08 12:15 AM   #35 
     - I don't think you can call Indiana, Virginia, and North Carolina run of the mill swing states.  SurferBoy   Nov-09-08 12:26 AM   #36 
  - Whoa! You made it higher than 20 posts!  HughMoran   Nov-08-08 10:36 PM   #10 
  - I'd like to second that  Capn Sunshine   Nov-09-08 12:10 AM   #31 
  - It's sustainable  VADem11   Nov-08-08 10:45 PM   #11 
  - Excellent summary  fujiyama   Nov-09-08 06:31 AM   #54 
  - Hey, is Colorado chopped liver or something?  FrenchieCat   Nov-08-08 10:48 PM   #12 
  - No FrenchieCat........  rogerballard   Nov-08-08 11:03 PM   #16 
  - Dang, I forgot to include CO in my post!  vixengrl   Nov-08-08 11:07 PM   #18 
  - Hell Yes. When you get states like IN that have been Red for generations,  Mayberry Machiavelli   Nov-08-08 10:50 PM   #13 
  - dupe deleted  Mayberry Machiavelli   Nov-08-08 10:50 PM   #14 
  - I'm going to argue--maybe it'll last without being a coalition--  vixengrl   Nov-08-08 11:04 PM   #17 
  - Right, Obama is a flash in the pan. What were we thinking?  Lord Helmet   Nov-08-08 11:08 PM   #19 
  - Well, like every other elected official, he ran on a platform  Sinti   Nov-08-08 11:25 PM   #22 
  - If you consider winning more whites than Kerry, Gore, Clinton, Dukakis, or Mondale being  Occam Bandage   Nov-08-08 11:27 PM   #23 
  - its about margins  Whoa20   Nov-09-08 12:05 AM   #27 
     - I disagree. 46% is quite strong for a Democrat; it requires only a modest victory in  Occam Bandage   Nov-09-08 12:09 AM   #30 
     - So?  VADem11   Nov-09-08 12:10 AM   #32 
        - Bush Sr.'s approvals were only in the low 40's  Whoa20   Nov-09-08 12:27 AM   #37 
           - Do you have a Clinton Fetish?  hnmnf   Nov-09-08 12:32 AM   #38 
           - I'm not dismissing IN, NC, VA, and CO,  Whoa20   Nov-09-08 12:35 AM   #40 
              - Duh. The answer is "let's continue what we started". If he has a successful term,  Mayberry Machiavelli   Nov-09-08 01:19 AM   #46 
           - The incumbent wasn't on the ballot in 2008  Hippo_Tron   Nov-09-08 12:43 AM   #42 
              - same principle,  Whoa20   Nov-09-08 12:48 AM   #43 
                 - Eisenhower was a national hero and Stevenson was a horrible campaigner  Hippo_Tron   Nov-09-08 12:53 AM   #44 
  - His coalition is sustainable ONLY if he has a successful presidency  ShadowLiberal   Nov-08-08 11:31 PM   #24 
  - Exactly, American voted for COMPETENCE not ideology  JCMach1   Nov-09-08 05:17 AM   #48 
  - The map changes every 8 year or so  Jake3463   Nov-08-08 11:42 PM   #26 
  - Good question - and yes, it is sustainable.  ROh70   Nov-09-08 12:06 AM   #28 
  - Concern troll 2.0...the New Edition  BluegrassDem   Nov-09-08 12:13 AM   #34 
  - One way to sustain Obama's coalition is a pathway to citizenship  workinclasszero   Nov-09-08 12:34 AM   #39 
  - OMG It's a Rovian trap, the Republicans wanted us to elect an un-electable candidate  Hippo_Tron   Nov-09-08 12:39 AM   #41 
  - Hell, if defining a successful president is one that wins a second term  fujiyama   Nov-09-08 06:44 AM   #55 
  - The premise of your post is silly. "Change the map", meaning long term, is unknowable right now.  Mayberry Machiavelli   Nov-09-08 01:16 AM   #45 
  - You make plenty of fantastic points  Awsi Dooger   Nov-09-08 01:27 AM   #47 
  - invalidates every success-ascribes success to "young people" then for the finale'  happychatter   Nov-09-08 05:37 AM   #49 
  - To sutain the coalition he has to have stron support in IN, NC, OH and VA  Perky   Nov-09-08 06:13 AM   #52 
  - Your premise itself is odd. The map WAS changed.  fujiyama   Nov-09-08 07:09 AM   #56 
  - Yes, the map changed. First, AR, MO, and LA are not the New South.  Zynx   Nov-09-08 08:01 AM   #57 
  - Did you pay attention to the WEST?!??!?!  tekisui   Nov-09-08 08:05 AM   #58 
  - Evidently not... The OP is CRAZY as a loon.  larissa   Nov-10-08 01:35 AM   #60 
  - gee you're on to something  JeffR   Nov-10-08 02:08 AM   #61 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC