Eric J in MN
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-08-08 10:28 PM
Response to Original message |
| 7. Re 2010: In midterm elections, usually the party NOT in the White House gains. |
|
We need to fight that trend in 2010.
|
| -Did Obama really change the map? Is his coalition sustainable? |
Whoa20 |
Nov-08-08 10:19 PM |
#0 |
-
He did not get 'demolished' in the white vote. |
Elrond Hubbard |
Nov-08-08 10:20 PM |
#1 |
 -
Not only that -- he got MORE of the white vote than either Kerry, Gore or Bill Clinton. |
Blondiegrrl |
Nov-08-08 11:09 PM |
#20 |
  -
in 1992, there were |
Whoa20 |
Nov-09-08 12:11 AM |
#33 |
 -
white vote: 55 to 43 |
fujiyama |
Nov-09-08 06:10 AM |
#51 |
-
South vs non-south white voters are 2 different animals politically |
Juche |
Nov-09-08 08:21 AM |
#59 |
-
YES! He's been so built up as a huge bogeyman by conservatives |
PretzelWarrior |
Nov-08-08 10:20 PM |
#2 |
-
Naw, it's all over ... we're destroyed ... may as well go on to the next liberal forum |
melody |
Nov-08-08 10:24 PM |
#3 |
 -
heh |
Mayberry Machiavelli |
Nov-08-08 10:27 PM |
#5 |
-
Word |
sniffa |
Nov-08-08 10:31 PM |
#9 |
-
Best avatar ever, sniffa! |
Mayberry Machiavelli |
Nov-08-08 10:55 PM |
#15 |
-
We (the Democratic Party) need to continue with Dean's 50 State Strategy. |
Starlight |
Nov-08-08 10:26 PM |
#4 |
-
Winning while Black. |
Mz Pip |
Nov-08-08 10:27 PM |
#6 |
 -
I'm sorry, Sir..... you're under.... |
happychatter |
Nov-09-08 05:41 AM |
#50 |
-
Re 2010: In midterm elections, usually the party NOT in the White House gains. |
Eric J in MN |
Nov-08-08 10:28 PM |
#7 |
 -
That trend has been lessened in recent years |
Marsala |
Nov-08-08 11:19 PM |
#21 |
-
Democrats may be at a ceiling in terms of flipping seats in Congress. |
tritsofme |
Nov-08-08 11:41 PM |
#25 |
-
'98 and '02 were anomalies in many ways |
fujiyama |
Nov-09-08 06:19 AM |
#53 |
-
He only won 9 red states, including 3 southern ones. Nothing major. |
SurferBoy |
Nov-08-08 10:30 PM |
#8 |
 -
but did he make permanent |
Whoa20 |
Nov-09-08 12:08 AM |
#29 |
-
Since when are VA, NC, and IN run of the mill swing states? |
hnmnf |
Nov-09-08 12:15 AM |
#35 |
-
I don't think you can call Indiana, Virginia, and North Carolina run of the mill swing states. |
SurferBoy |
Nov-09-08 12:26 AM |
#36 |
-
Whoa! You made it higher than 20 posts! |
HughMoran |
Nov-08-08 10:36 PM |
#10 |
 -
I'd like to second that |
Capn Sunshine |
Nov-09-08 12:10 AM |
#31 |
-
It's sustainable |
VADem11 |
Nov-08-08 10:45 PM |
#11 |
 -
Excellent summary |
fujiyama |
Nov-09-08 06:31 AM |
#54 |
-
Hey, is Colorado chopped liver or something? |
FrenchieCat |
Nov-08-08 10:48 PM |
#12 |
 -
No FrenchieCat........ |
rogerballard |
Nov-08-08 11:03 PM |
#16 |
 -
Dang, I forgot to include CO in my post! |
vixengrl |
Nov-08-08 11:07 PM |
#18 |
-
Hell Yes. When you get states like IN that have been Red for generations, |
Mayberry Machiavelli |
Nov-08-08 10:50 PM |
#13 |
-
dupe deleted |
Mayberry Machiavelli |
Nov-08-08 10:50 PM |
#14 |
-
I'm going to argue--maybe it'll last without being a coalition-- |
vixengrl |
Nov-08-08 11:04 PM |
#17 |
-
Right, Obama is a flash in the pan. What were we thinking? |
Lord Helmet |
Nov-08-08 11:08 PM |
#19 |
-
Well, like every other elected official, he ran on a platform |
Sinti |
Nov-08-08 11:25 PM |
#22 |
-
If you consider winning more whites than Kerry, Gore, Clinton, Dukakis, or Mondale being |
Occam Bandage |
Nov-08-08 11:27 PM |
#23 |
 -
its about margins |
Whoa20 |
Nov-09-08 12:05 AM |
#27 |
-
I disagree. 46% is quite strong for a Democrat; it requires only a modest victory in |
Occam Bandage |
Nov-09-08 12:09 AM |
#30 |
-
So? |
VADem11 |
Nov-09-08 12:10 AM |
#32 |
-
Bush Sr.'s approvals were only in the low 40's |
Whoa20 |
Nov-09-08 12:27 AM |
#37 |
-
Do you have a Clinton Fetish? |
hnmnf |
Nov-09-08 12:32 AM |
#38 |
 -
I'm not dismissing IN, NC, VA, and CO, |
Whoa20 |
Nov-09-08 12:35 AM |
#40 |
-
Duh. The answer is "let's continue what we started". If he has a successful term, |
Mayberry Machiavelli |
Nov-09-08 01:19 AM |
#46 |
-
The incumbent wasn't on the ballot in 2008 |
Hippo_Tron |
Nov-09-08 12:43 AM |
#42 |
-
same principle, |
Whoa20 |
Nov-09-08 12:48 AM |
#43 |
-
Eisenhower was a national hero and Stevenson was a horrible campaigner |
Hippo_Tron |
Nov-09-08 12:53 AM |
#44 |
-
His coalition is sustainable ONLY if he has a successful presidency |
ShadowLiberal |
Nov-08-08 11:31 PM |
#24 |
 -
Exactly, American voted for COMPETENCE not ideology |
JCMach1 |
Nov-09-08 05:17 AM |
#48 |
-
The map changes every 8 year or so |
Jake3463 |
Nov-08-08 11:42 PM |
#26 |
-
Good question - and yes, it is sustainable. |
ROh70 |
Nov-09-08 12:06 AM |
#28 |
-
Concern troll 2.0...the New Edition |
BluegrassDem |
Nov-09-08 12:13 AM |
#34 |
-
One way to sustain Obama's coalition is a pathway to citizenship |
workinclasszero |
Nov-09-08 12:34 AM |
#39 |
-
OMG It's a Rovian trap, the Republicans wanted us to elect an un-electable candidate |
Hippo_Tron |
Nov-09-08 12:39 AM |
#41 |
 -
Hell, if defining a successful president is one that wins a second term |
fujiyama |
Nov-09-08 06:44 AM |
#55 |
-
The premise of your post is silly. "Change the map", meaning long term, is unknowable right now. |
Mayberry Machiavelli |
Nov-09-08 01:16 AM |
#45 |
-
You make plenty of fantastic points |
Awsi Dooger |
Nov-09-08 01:27 AM |
#47 |
-
invalidates every success-ascribes success to "young people" then for the finale' |
happychatter |
Nov-09-08 05:37 AM |
#49 |
-
To sutain the coalition he has to have stron support in IN, NC, OH and VA |
Perky |
Nov-09-08 06:13 AM |
#52 |
-
Your premise itself is odd. The map WAS changed. |
fujiyama |
Nov-09-08 07:09 AM |
#56 |
-
Yes, the map changed. First, AR, MO, and LA are not the New South. |
Zynx |
Nov-09-08 08:01 AM |
#57 |
-
Did you pay attention to the WEST?!??!?! |
tekisui |
Nov-09-08 08:05 AM |
#58 |
 -
Evidently not... The OP is CRAZY as a loon. |
larissa |
Nov-10-08 01:35 AM |
#60 |
-
gee you're on to something |
JeffR |
Nov-10-08 02:08 AM |
#61 |