Coexist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-29-08 08:01 PM
Response to Original message |
| 6. cut UNDER 200k, NO CHANGE 200-250k, TAX CUT ROLLBACK over $250k |
| -Not Trying To Show "Concern," But Did Anyone Notice When It Said People Making < $200,000 |
malik flavors |
Oct-29-08 08:00 PM |
#0 |
-
He always said people making under $ 250,000 will pay no new taxes... |
WCGreen |
Oct-29-08 08:00 PM |
#1 |
-
200-250,000 No change, greater than 250,000 a tax increase |
dmordue |
Oct-29-08 08:01 PM |
#2 |
-
I'm still in the 20K-50K group, so I'm cool |
NightWatcher |
Oct-29-08 08:01 PM |
#3 |
-
$200K for single people |
sniffa |
Oct-29-08 08:01 PM |
#4 |
 -
Oh really? Never heard about that. |
malik flavors |
Oct-29-08 08:02 PM |
#8 |
 -
No..that's not right.. |
stillcool47 |
Oct-29-08 08:09 PM |
#21 |
-
D'oh! |
sniffa |
Oct-29-08 08:58 PM |
#32 |
-
It's always been like that |
phusion |
Oct-29-08 08:01 PM |
#5 |
-
cut UNDER 200k, NO CHANGE 200-250k, TAX CUT ROLLBACK over $250k |
FLDem5 |
Oct-29-08 08:01 PM |
#6 |
-
He's always said ... under $250,000 gets no increase... under $200,000 gets a CUT |
scheming daemons |
Oct-29-08 08:02 PM |
#7 |
 -
That was the difference in language. That's why the media didn't jump on him!!! n/t |
vaberella |
Oct-29-08 08:03 PM |
#12 |
 -
Oh, ok. So btwn 200,000 and 250,000 just doesn't get raised, but no cut either. Got it. |
malik flavors |
Oct-29-08 08:04 PM |
#14 |
-
I noticed it..shows we're |
zidzi |
Oct-29-08 08:02 PM |
#9 |
-
If you make less then $250,000 your taxes will NOT go up - not your payroll taxes, not your |
Pirate Smile |
Oct-29-08 08:03 PM |
#10 |
-
And Obama always said even people around 300K would |
vaberella |
Oct-29-08 08:03 PM |
#11 |
-
It has always been "People making 250k and under won't see their taxes raised a single dime |
TheKentuckian |
Oct-29-08 08:03 PM |
#13 |
-
I thought it was over $250,000, your taxes won't go up - not that you'll get a tax cut. |
always_saturday |
Oct-29-08 08:04 PM |
#15 |
 -
It's not new. It's always been the plan. |
nsd |
Oct-29-08 08:06 PM |
#17 |
 -
no...under 200,000 gets a cut... |
stillcool47 |
Oct-29-08 08:08 PM |
#19 |
 -
def. not over. Under $250,000. |
malik flavors |
Oct-29-08 08:09 PM |
#20 |
-
It's what he's always been saying |
WallStreetNobody |
Oct-29-08 08:05 PM |
#16 |
-
under 200,000 gets a cut... |
stillcool47 |
Oct-29-08 08:07 PM |
#18 |
-
Sigh. |
BlooInBloo |
Oct-29-08 08:10 PM |
#22 |
 -
Wow, sorry I asked a question. Freaking elitist... |
malik flavors |
Oct-29-08 08:15 PM |
#23 |
-
This question has been asked multiple times tonight |
endthewar |
Oct-29-08 08:22 PM |
#25 |
-
I listen. I read. Therefore I am elitist. We're a stupid, stupid country. |
BlooInBloo |
Oct-29-08 08:32 PM |
#29 |
-
You're sigh, was a snobish response. Are you claiming that you've never asked a question? |
malik flavors |
Oct-29-08 08:36 PM |
#30 |
-
the Rethugs have had a field day over Biden saying $150K |
Mystery2Me |
Oct-29-08 08:16 PM |
#24 |
 -
Paris Hilton, socialist, domestic terrorist, celebrity, Britney Spears, teaches sex to kids |
endthewar |
Oct-29-08 08:28 PM |
#26 |
-
Yep. I caught that too. Always heard $250K before. WAAASSSUUPPP with that? |
bertman |
Oct-29-08 08:28 PM |
#27 |
-
Wow.....I was waiting for a freeper to come over and post that! |
FrenchieCat |
Oct-29-08 08:29 PM |
#28 |
-
Just because McSame's little mind can't figure it out, doesn't mean no one else can't figure it out. |
Life Long Dem |
Oct-29-08 08:39 PM |
#31 |