You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #12: And even in those terms she still got the meat of the argument wrong. (eom) [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
justiceischeap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-08 11:26 AM
Response to Original message
12. And even in those terms she still got the meat of the argument wrong. (eom)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Palin Camp: "She was explaining in terms a third-grader could understand" sabra  Oct-22-08 11:21 AM   #0 
  - sad  ErinBerin84   Oct-22-08 11:22 AM   #1 
  - She basically then told the 3rd grader erroneous info.  Katzenkavalier   Oct-22-08 11:22 AM   #2 
  - Can a 3rd grader understand misinformation?  Merlot   Oct-22-08 11:23 AM   #3 
  - Ntot true. She's been intentionally blurring the line between the Executive and the Legislative  MercutioATC   Oct-22-08 11:23 AM   #4 
  - exactly....she could almost get away with it if not for her past answers.  ErinBerin84   Oct-22-08 11:25 AM   #8 
  - bwahahahahaha! How PATHETIC AND DESPERATE!  Wolfies Revenge   Oct-22-08 11:23 AM   #5 
  - Couldn't she have simply told the truth in words a 3rd grader would understand?  yardwork   Oct-22-08 11:24 AM   #6 
  - A third grader understands "policy changes"?? This doesn't come  pdxmom   Oct-22-08 11:25 AM   #7 
  - as a rule 3rd graders don't vote... however  radfringe   Oct-22-08 11:25 AM   #9 
  - Here's some data on those supporters  Indenturedebtor   Oct-23-08 06:35 AM   #55 
  - How's this, Sarah:  npincus   Oct-22-08 11:25 AM   #10 
  - By the way, I have a 3rd grader at home. And he thinks Palin is an idiot.  AtomTan   Oct-22-08 02:55 PM   #38 
     - LOL- works for me!  npincus   Oct-23-08 05:53 AM   #48 
  - What, a 3rd grader can't understand "if McCain bites it, I'm the Prez"?  AchtungToddler   Oct-22-08 11:25 AM   #11 
  - And even in those terms she still got the meat of the argument wrong. (eom)  thecorrection   Oct-22-08 11:26 AM   #12 
  - Of course she was. That's her mental level.  EstimatedProphet   Oct-22-08 11:26 AM   #13 
  - Breaking a tie vote in the senate  leftynyc   Oct-22-08 11:27 AM   #14 
  - lol! This is absurd. Why couldn't a third grader understand the truth? It's actually  OmmmSweetOmmm   Oct-22-08 11:27 AM   #15 
  - Yeah, right.  sunder   Oct-22-08 11:28 AM   #16 
  - What an insult to every teacher and parent in the country  alcibiades_mystery   Oct-22-08 11:28 AM   #17 
  - I wonder if her supporters will get that this is an insult towards them?  WI_DEM   Oct-22-08 11:28 AM   #18 
  - it's like  ErinBerin84   Oct-22-08 11:29 AM   #19 
  - LOL. Lets educate the children with "Her" version of the Constitution.  CADEMOCRAT7   Oct-22-08 11:30 AM   #20 
  - Too bad the 3rd grader couldn't explain the question so the GOVENOR could understand....  RoadRage   Oct-22-08 11:31 AM   #21 
  - I saw this on Olbermann last night  alison   Oct-22-08 11:31 AM   #22 
  - Yeah,because no 3rd grader would understand the concept of a TIE  PA Democrat   Oct-22-08 11:33 AM   #23 
  - .  spokane   Oct-22-08 11:33 AM   #24 
  - Mika thinks that was a "Great!" answer because....  GalleryGod   Oct-22-08 11:35 AM   #25 
  - Third graders deserve truthful, if simplified, answers. nt  deadparrot   Oct-22-08 11:37 AM   #26 
  - Their defense is that lying to third-graders is better than lying to adults?  No Surrender   Oct-22-08 11:38 AM   #27 
  - so, it's ok to lie to children.... nice argument  Essene   Oct-22-08 11:39 AM   #28 
  - Come to think of it, does this explain why she said basically the same  pdxmom   Oct-22-08 11:40 AM   #29 
  - The thing is, she implied exactly the same thing at a freaking debate.  Arrowhead2k1   Oct-22-08 11:42 AM   #30 
  - Actually, most people know very little about the office of the Vice-President......  suston96   Oct-22-08 11:43 AM   #31 
  - This explanation makes sense to me  rvablue   Oct-22-08 11:50 AM   #32 
  - This explanation makes sense to me  rvablue   Oct-22-08 11:50 AM   #33 
  - I taught third grade for ten years  ayeshahaqqiqa   Oct-22-08 12:41 PM   #34 
  - A 3rd grader knows what a "tie-break" is.  mwei924   Oct-22-08 02:45 PM   #35 
  - What's great about this  AtomTan   Oct-22-08 02:53 PM   #36 
  - I don't understand why make this statement  Johonny   Oct-22-08 02:53 PM   #37 
  - Third graders can understand that the VP breaks ties.  freestyle   Oct-22-08 02:55 PM   #39 
  - Ugh. "agenda" is not a third grader term. Secondly she explained it incorrectly.  vaberella   Oct-22-08 03:02 PM   #40 
  - The problem is she has no idea what a VP does.  TexasObserver   Oct-22-08 03:03 PM   #41 
  - She said that the VP was gonna get in there and "make policy" with them  DeschutesRiver   Oct-22-08 03:08 PM   #42 
  - Nope. Sorry. That excuse won't wash. I HAVE a third grader.  Left Is Write   Oct-22-08 03:09 PM   #43 
  - "so if they want to they can really get in there with the senators and make a lot of policy changes"  kineta   Oct-22-08 03:10 PM   #44 
  - so she lies to 3rd graders just like she lies to everyone else.  BklynChick   Oct-22-08 03:28 PM   #45 
  - Unbelievable. So kids are too stupid to understand the correct answer.  Cass   Oct-22-08 03:46 PM   #46 
  - "Tie-breaking vote" is too difficult for a third-grader?  Harvey Korman   Oct-22-08 03:48 PM   #47 
  - Ahhh...so she wa LYING to a third-grader?  LynnTheDem   Oct-23-08 06:14 AM   #49 
  - Sarah was right  Bad Thoughts   Oct-23-08 06:22 AM   #50 
  - She gave false information, period.  polichick   Oct-23-08 06:24 AM   #51 
  - which was more complex, BTW, than the correct explanation would have been.  npincus   Oct-23-08 06:29 AM   #53 
     - Exactly! imo she really believes that the veep can have more power...  polichick   Oct-23-08 06:35 AM   #54 
  - Nothing like confusing a 3rd grader for no good reason. If the 3rd grader can understand "Vice-  No Elephants   Oct-23-08 06:26 AM   #52 
  - Clueless. I had to put up with this crap in high school.  obiwan   Oct-23-08 06:39 AM   #56 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC