You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #11: But Mitchell didn't call it negative - she called it "Extremely Negative" [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-20-08 10:29 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. But Mitchell didn't call it negative - she called it "Extremely Negative"
what is extremely negative about the truth unless it happens to be the guy you are supporting that is getting the 'attacks'.

Obama is simply revealing the truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Dear Andrea Mitchell - if you don't know the difference between a negative ad and the truth.... LynneSin  Oct-20-08 09:39 AM   #0 
  - I was shouting at the TV over her mischaracterization  sybylla   Oct-20-08 09:43 AM   #1 
  - Even FactCheck.org backs it up!  TTUBatfan2008   Oct-20-08 09:44 AM   #2 
  - Since when has quoting fact become negative?  Tim4319   Oct-20-08 09:44 AM   #3 
  - Quoting facts IS negative  butlerd   Oct-20-08 10:20 AM   #9 
  - Yeah I've been pretty pissed about the characterizing of "negative ads"  MessiahRp   Oct-20-08 09:48 AM   #4 
  - I thought negative advertising simply meant...  targetpractice   Oct-20-08 09:49 AM   #5 
  - I believe negative is more of an attack on character  LynneSin   Oct-20-08 10:06 AM   #6 
  - You got it right.  IMModerate   Oct-20-08 10:14 AM   #8 
  - You are correct.  Left Is Write   Oct-20-08 10:42 AM   #12 
  - Andrea is just supporting the Republicans as she does 70% of the time.  Overseas   Oct-20-08 10:14 AM   #7 
  - a negative ad can be 100% true  grantcart   Oct-20-08 10:26 AM   #10 
  - But Mitchell didn't call it negative - she called it "Extremely Negative"  LynneSin   Oct-20-08 10:29 AM   #11 
  - yesterday she used the term as simply 'negative' - did she say it was untrue  grantcart   Oct-20-08 11:03 AM   #15 
  - That is not the heretofore commonly-used sense of the term "negative ad". The term is a pejorative,  WinkyDink   Oct-20-08 11:01 AM   #14 
  - Facts are un-American.  WinkyDink   Oct-20-08 11:00 AM   #13 
  - Hubby and I were shocked by her statement, too.  lady lib   Oct-20-08 11:15 AM   #16 
  - I am all to sick of faux outrage.  Laelth   Oct-20-08 10:49 PM   #17 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC