You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #3: They didn't make it that easy. They specifically state that she didn't violate state law. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
truthisfreedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-10-08 09:04 PM
Response to Original message
3. They didn't make it that easy. They specifically state that she didn't violate state law.
I think they wanted her to not be able to get off the hook so easily, and to be stuck as a boat anchor/albatross around John's neck.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.ph...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Sarah Palin INELIGIBLE To Be Vice President...? JFN1  Oct-10-08 09:00 PM   #0 
  - Excellent point! nt  speedoo   Oct-10-08 09:01 PM   #1 
  - Your pic has me wondering how Molly would have reacted to Palin.  Fridays Child   Oct-10-08 09:05 PM   #6 
     - Yeah, she would have had a lot to say about Palin, for sure. nt  speedoo   Oct-10-08 09:10 PM   #10 
  - Wanna bet the Scalia Gang will see it that way?  Jackpine Radical   Oct-10-08 09:03 PM   #2 
  - It'll never get that far. n/t  renie408   Oct-10-08 09:05 PM   #4 
  - They didn't make it that easy. They specifically state that she didn't violate state law.  truthisfreedom   Oct-10-08 09:04 PM   #3 
  - They also say she did.  JFN1   Oct-10-08 09:08 PM   #8 
  - 100%  johnnydrama   Oct-10-08 09:11 PM   #11 
  - They explicitly DID say she violated state ethics law  Essene   Oct-11-08 10:00 AM   #19 
  - Please read the report. She did violate the law.  OmmmSweetOmmm   Oct-11-08 10:18 AM   #24 
  - Keep her in there, JFN1  Condem   Oct-10-08 09:05 PM   #5 
  - She hasn't been elected yet, so she can't be removed from office.  BerryBush   Oct-10-08 09:07 PM   #7 
  - Not At All  ribofunk   Oct-10-08 09:09 PM   #9 
  - She didn't violate the state law  greenvpi   Oct-10-08 09:17 PM   #12 
  - Yes, she did violate state law. Not by firing Monegan, but  BigAnth   Oct-10-08 09:27 PM   #13 
  - You're wrong here.  pointsoflight   Oct-10-08 09:38 PM   #14 
  - report explicitly said she violated state ethics law  Essene   Oct-11-08 10:00 AM   #20 
  - She did violate a state law, just not the one you're thinking of  Higher Standard   Oct-11-08 10:01 AM   #21 
  - Inciting hatred  Mz Pip   Oct-10-08 09:39 PM   #15 
  - Sigh.  eyesroll   Oct-10-08 09:52 PM   #16 
  - constitutionally, a finding by a legislative committee is meaningless  unblock   Oct-10-08 10:35 PM   #17 
  - Uh...no  EstimatedProphet   Oct-11-08 09:59 AM   #18 
  - Until there is a conviction, this is no better than people going after Obama's birth certificate  slackmaster   Oct-11-08 10:10 AM   #22 
     - It will be just as ineffective, but at least this is documented behavior Palin willfully engaged in  jpgray   Oct-11-08 10:13 AM   #23 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC