You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Reply #25: That's fine because those are facts. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
rug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 11:40 AM
Response to Reply #24
25. That's fine because those are facts.
The who's the mommy threads are ludicrous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
  -Attacking Sarah Palin is Dangerous... Wolsh  Aug-31-08 10:53 AM   #0 
  - Sure seems that way.  tekisui   Aug-31-08 10:54 AM   #1 
  - No, sticking your nose up her birth canal is.  rug   Aug-31-08 10:54 AM   #2 
  - I'm very well aware of the difference, and I am 100% sure if this was Romney  Wolsh   Aug-31-08 10:55 AM   #4 
  - Robots don't reproduce  CreekDog   Aug-31-08 10:57 AM   #6 
  - Now you're claiming her Downs Syndrome son is a love child?  rug   Aug-31-08 10:58 AM   #9 
     - I was making a comparison, not calling her child a love child.  Wolsh   Aug-31-08 10:59 AM   #10 
        - I'm not sticking up for her, I'm wiping your speculative shit off my shoes.  rug   Aug-31-08 11:02 AM   #15 
           - You don't know how to win elections, that why we lose  nomad1776   Aug-31-08 02:42 PM   #60 
              - What did you study, Political Hysterics 101?  rug   Aug-31-08 07:42 PM   #64 
  - Wrong. Since, by opposing abortion and presumably birth control,  kestrel91316   Aug-31-08 11:24 AM   #21 
     - I don't know whose nose has been up your vagina but I do know you don't ensure abortion rights by  rug   Aug-31-08 11:33 AM   #23 
        - Speculation? The woman is an Assemblies of God fundie wacko.  kestrel91316   Aug-31-08 11:38 AM   #24 
           - That's fine because those are facts.  rug   Aug-31-08 11:40 AM   #25 
              - I'm not the NYT. I don't claim to publish only facts.  kestrel91316   Aug-31-08 11:58 AM   # 
                 - If you don't like being called on your bullshit, stop posting bullshit.  rug   Aug-31-08 12:16 PM   #51 
                    - Take your own advice, kid.  Wolsh   Aug-31-08 07:38 PM   #61 
                       - I usually do but in this case all the bullshit is running downstream.  rug   Aug-31-08 07:43 PM   #66 
  - No. Attack her HARD on the issues, there are PLENTY of those  PeaceNikki   Aug-31-08 10:55 AM   #3 
  - The only different standard she's being held to is an aura of protection by those among us who vote  Wolsh   Aug-31-08 10:56 AM   #5 
  - Exactly. Notice, the same people sticking up for Palin  redstate_democrat   Aug-31-08 11:03 AM   #16 
     - It's supporting women, women's issues and rights regardless of political affiliation.  PeaceNikki   Aug-31-08 11:04 AM   #17 
        - It is sad, that you will protect a woman who is against everything the Democratic Party stands for  Wolsh   Aug-31-08 11:15 AM   #19 
        - I'm not "protecting" her. There are many other reasons to attack her.  PeaceNikki   Aug-31-08 11:17 AM   #20 
        - What a silly post.  Beausoir   Aug-31-08 11:46 AM   #35 
        - It speaks nothing about, because you havn't seen me make any attacks outside of issues on Palin...  Wolsh   Aug-31-08 07:41 PM   #62 
        - Yes, Isn't that the height of sexism?  TexasObserver   Aug-31-08 12:29 PM   #55 
        - Women like Liz Dole or Eva Braun?  IndianaGreen   Aug-31-08 11:45 AM   #33 
           - Let's not forget "Maggie" Thatcher and all those beloved queens  dailykoff   Aug-31-08 11:47 AM   #36 
  - You're exactly right.  terrya   Aug-31-08 11:31 AM   #22 
     - It's a weak argument for those too stupid to educate themselves on the real issues  PeaceNikki   Aug-31-08 11:41 AM   #27 
  - We, the grassroots, need to question her ability to take over from Melanoma McCain  ClarkUSA   Aug-31-08 10:58 AM   #7 
  - Yes! Sarah Palin is OFF THE TABLE!  dailykoff   Aug-31-08 10:58 AM   #8 
  - Her teenaged daughter should be off the table.  Pamela Troy   Aug-31-08 11:42 AM   #31 
     - Her "teenaged daughter" that you keep mentioning isn't the issue.  dailykoff   Aug-31-08 11:43 AM   #32 
     - Oh please -- eagerly spreading a rumor that the girl had an unwed pregnancy  Pamela Troy   Aug-31-08 11:46 AM   #34 
        - Look, once you take the Big Lie off the table, and oh the little ones too,  dailykoff   Aug-31-08 11:49 AM   #38 
           - Baloney. Refraining from this asinine turd-throwing in no way takes the large issues off the table.  Pamela Troy   Aug-31-08 11:52 AM   #40 
              - Wrong. If you ignore the dirty laundry you're going to lose  dailykoff   Aug-31-08 11:54 AM   #41 
                 - Really? "That's all they got?" There are no large issues on which to attack Palin?  Pamela Troy   Aug-31-08 11:55 AM   #42 
                    - Well there's Alaskan oil drilling, which seems to be her talking point strong suit.  dailykoff   Aug-31-08 11:57 AM   #43 
                       - So why are you so intent on distracting attention from that larger issue?  Pamela Troy   Aug-31-08 11:58 AM   #44 
                          - Um, notice that I'm the only one to actually raise a political issue.  dailykoff   Aug-31-08 12:00 PM   #46 
                             - AFTER you were asked about it. Your first choice was rolling around in this Rovian Crap.  Pamela Troy   Aug-31-08 12:03 PM   #47 
                                - Look, YOU want to talk about the daughter, Rove, and bicycle seats.  dailykoff   Aug-31-08 12:04 PM   #48 
                                   - No, I don't. That's my point. Now run along.  Pamela Troy   Aug-31-08 12:11 PM   #49 
                                   - "go to a Hillary forum and cry your eyes out"  PeaceNikki   Aug-31-08 12:12 PM   #50 
     - I don't remember you speaking up when we went after Romney's dog killing son.  Wolsh   Aug-31-08 07:42 PM   #65 
  - No one is saying that attacking her is wrong  Ernesto-Che-Guevara   Aug-31-08 10:59 AM   #11 
  - And those Care Bears are wrong. It's as simple as that.  TexasObserver   Aug-31-08 12:31 PM   #57 
  - Don't pay any attention to the Freepers  redstate_democrat   Aug-31-08 11:00 AM   #12 
  - The wannabe "freepers" are the one's pushing this inane attack on a kid.  Pamela Troy   Aug-31-08 11:47 AM   #37 
  - no  qazplm   Aug-31-08 11:00 AM   #13 
  - You should worry about yourself, and not every other poster.  TexasObserver   Aug-31-08 12:35 PM   #58 
  - hehe, you got me there... NOT attacking Palin is More dangerous  Motown_Johnny   Aug-31-08 11:01 AM   #14 
  - agreed.  everything-bolt-up   Aug-31-08 11:07 AM   #18 
  - Are you truly having trouble grasping the difference between attacking Palin  Pamela Troy   Aug-31-08 11:40 AM   #26 
  - Stick to the judgment attacks.  backscatter712   Aug-31-08 11:41 AM   #28 
  - Nobody should attack McCain either.  lizzy   Aug-31-08 11:41 AM   #29 
  - nope, she should be attacked relentlessly for her whacked out  jonnyblitz   Aug-31-08 11:42 AM   #30 
  - strawman argument  paulk   Aug-31-08 11:51 AM   #39 
  - McCain is the one running for President. Go after him.  Clear Blue Sky   Aug-31-08 11:59 AM   #45 
  - I Havent's Seen a Single Post Asking People Not To Attack Palin  Crisco   Aug-31-08 12:20 PM   #52 
  - Hey, you can't say anything about her, because ...  TexasObserver   Aug-31-08 12:25 PM   #53 
  - Are you unable to grasp the difference between attacking  Pamela Troy   Aug-31-08 12:26 PM   #54 
  - It's the Sexist double standard by some here  nomad1776   Aug-31-08 12:30 PM   #56 
  - Yes, it is appalling.  TexasObserver   Aug-31-08 12:37 PM   #59 
  - And this is the well said point of this thread.  Wolsh   Aug-31-08 07:42 PM   #63 
  - There answer to your request is a "NO" from them.  Life Long Dem   Aug-31-08 09:47 PM   #67 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC