 |
Latest | Greatest | Lobby | Journals | Search | Options | Help | Login |
|
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
| Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
|
BlueEyedSon
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-24-04 11:27 AM Response to Original message |
| 2. Of course not, it was illegal for the Congress to abrogate their war power |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| -Should Kerry have voted for both $87 billions? | MattNC | Aug-24-04 11:24 AM | #0 |
 -
NO! I called my senator and asked her not to vote for it. It did not |
schultzee | Aug-24-04 11:26 AM | #1 |
| -
Of course not, it was illegal for the Congress to abrogate their war power |
BlueEyedSon | Aug-24-04 11:27 AM | #2 |
| -
Absolutely not. |
goodhue | Aug-24-04 11:27 AM | #3 |
| -
The $87 billion was never in question. |
ClassWarrior | Aug-24-04 11:28 AM | #4 |
| -
If his vote had been meaningful, he would have voted for it.... |
kentuck | Aug-24-04 11:30 AM | #5 |
| -
No, but he should be more obvious in pointing out that it was a bad bill |
PurityOfEssence | Aug-24-04 11:34 AM | #6 |
 -
kicking because there WEREN'T two $87 billions. |
ClassWarrior | Aug-24-04 11:47 AM | #7 |
| Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
|
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC