You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #2: I'd say 36 of them are reasonable choices [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
Arnold Judas Rimmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-08 09:21 PM
Response to Original message
2. I'd say 36 of them are reasonable choices
though I like some better than others. And there are factors like, replacing an elected position - especially crucial since we need a bigger senate majority.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Give us the NUMBER (sum) of these potential veeps' names acceptable to you. Old Crusoe  Aug-04-08 09:17 PM   #0 
  - About 25 of them.  Zynx   Aug-04-08 09:20 PM   #1 
  - I'd say 36 of them are reasonable choices  Arnold Judas Rimmer   Aug-04-08 09:21 PM   #2 
  - 17.  blue neen   Aug-04-08 09:22 PM   #3 
  - 9  emilyg   Aug-04-08 09:23 PM   #4 
  - Maybe four.  kevsand   Aug-04-08 09:23 PM   #5 
  - You left out Melinda Gates. n/t  CK_John   Aug-04-08 09:23 PM   #6 
  - Hi, CK_John. I just threw her on there.  Old Crusoe   Aug-04-08 09:24 PM   #7 
  - Here is my case:  CK_John   Aug-04-08 09:48 PM   #20 
     - OK, I readily admit I had not considered it from that angle  Old Crusoe   Aug-04-08 09:49 PM   #21 
  - Mrs. Microsoft?  Arnold Judas Rimmer   Aug-04-08 09:24 PM   #8 
  - about 16 acceptable, but only about 6 or 7 happy. nt  JoeIsOneOfUs   Aug-04-08 09:25 PM   #9 
  - Four!  trayfoot   Aug-04-08 09:26 PM   #10 
  - I'm reasonably ok with 44 of these folks, and very enthusiastic with 13.  Old Crusoe   Aug-04-08 09:28 PM   #11 
  - Only one is acceptable to me.  prodn2000   Aug-04-08 09:30 PM   #12 
  - No argument there.  Old Crusoe   Aug-04-08 10:27 PM   #31 
  - Only one. Because we're much more likely to lose if Clinton isn't on the ticket. Polls have shown  highplainsdem   Aug-04-08 09:30 PM   #13 
  - Kaine or Schweitzer would be the smart picks  BrentTaylor   Aug-04-08 09:31 PM   #14 
  - 4  DJ13   Aug-04-08 09:31 PM   #15 
  - Six (6). All things considered.  The Village Idiot   Aug-04-08 09:33 PM   #16 
  - Bobby Jr.  floridablue   Aug-04-08 09:34 PM   #17 
  - Nine, but who's counting?  psquare   Aug-04-08 09:40 PM   #18 
  - 7. nt  blondeatlast   Aug-04-08 09:43 PM   #19 
  - 26  BlueDogDemocratNH   Aug-04-08 09:56 PM   #22 
  - BDDNH, I can see your reasons and the divisions you get using those  Old Crusoe   Aug-04-08 10:04 PM   #25 
  - Many Hillary Supporters will say 1 ... Many Obama Supporters will say 59  scheming daemons   Aug-04-08 09:59 PM   #23 
  - 24 1/2  nevergiveup   Aug-04-08 10:00 PM   #24 
  - I think over on the red team, Mitt Romney probably WOULD saw himself  Old Crusoe   Aug-04-08 10:05 PM   #27 
  - 16.  tekisui   Aug-04-08 10:05 PM   #26 
  - Seven. n/t  janx   Aug-04-08 10:07 PM   #28 
  - You forgot about the senior senator from New Jersey.  prodn2000   Aug-04-08 10:19 PM   #29 
  - Frank Lautenberg?  Old Crusoe   Aug-04-08 10:23 PM   #30 
     - And after a contentious 2002, he is gonna win re-election with a very nice margin.  prodn2000   Aug-04-08 10:40 PM   #35 
        - Great. That is good news. I want New Jersey to stay true-blue and  Old Crusoe   Aug-04-08 10:43 PM   #38 
           - Surprisingly, he has got a lot sharper since he started his term in 02.  prodn2000   Aug-04-08 10:45 PM   #40 
  - About 30 are acceptable...  YvonneCa   Aug-04-08 10:30 PM   #32 
  - Cool. Hi YvonneCa.  Old Crusoe   Aug-04-08 10:31 PM   #33 
  - 55-I excluded the Republicans and Nunn.....but then I repeat myself....  Rowdyboy   Aug-04-08 10:33 PM   #34 
  - Hi, Rowdyboy.  Old Crusoe   Aug-04-08 10:42 PM   #36 
  - 8.  emmadoggy   Aug-04-08 10:43 PM   #37 
  - Acceptable? At Least 40  ribofunk   Aug-04-08 10:44 PM   #39 
  - Why don't Gates or Reed rate numbers? Oh.. and about.. umm.... 30 of those  Motown_Johnny   Aug-04-08 10:45 PM   #41 
  - I added Gates at CK_John's suggestion and realized that I had left  Old Crusoe   Aug-04-08 10:47 PM   #42 
  - About 37, for me  Independent_Voice   Aug-05-08 12:23 AM   #43 
  - 22  Obama_for_our_future   Aug-05-08 12:44 AM   #44 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC