Reply #13: well...I DID READ the NYorker article in FULL...it took a long time it's a 15 pager...

[KoKo]

which most of us have little time for.

What bothered me was that the Art Work on the Cover...had NOTHING to do with Lizza's article...which one would have had to be a "policy wonk" to get through the whole 15 pages...because so much has been written about his period in Obama's life...that some folks eyes "glaze over" and those who really wanted to read the article, even though they were offended by the NYorker Cover...might have missed what Chicago Politics is all about and how Obama managed to over come it all.

The article by Lizza is such a disconnect from the "Cover Art" it's mind boggling. Yet the "Cover Art" is what the Bloggers and Cable and RW Pundits are focusing on.

Maybe this is a GOOD THING for Obama. Folks don't read the article (inside the mag) but get into arguments about the New Yorker Cover Art (which personally, I thought was disgusting because it wasn't a satire on the ARTICLE inside the Magazine but a blatant attemept to get folks to go out and BUY the MAGAZINE!

There's NOTHING in that article that would allow the "artist" to portray Michelle as a "gun toatin' Angela Davis" or Obama as "Osama." The article is all about his career in Chicago Politics.

It's all a STUNT! which kind of "pukes me out."