You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Reply #22: It doesn't have to say "satire" [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-08 10:25 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. It doesn't have to say "satire"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
  -Do you think the New Yorker Obama cover is funny and positive or disgraceful and negative? Katzenkavalier  Jul-13-08 09:39 PM   #0 
  - It only helps Obama if he laughs at it  Kurt_and_Hunter   Jul-13-08 09:40 PM   #1 
  - He's not laughing at it... at least so far...  Katzenkavalier   Jul-13-08 09:41 PM   #3 
  - Yeah, I added to the reply in light of that  Kurt_and_Hunter   Jul-13-08 09:44 PM   #6 
  - Indeed. Black people should always laugh when white people depict them as terrorists...  BlooInBloo   Jul-13-08 09:46 PM   #9 
     - (sigh)  IntravenousDemilo   Jul-13-08 10:02 PM   #14 
     - That's right -  cliffordu   Jul-13-08 10:15 PM   #16 
     - Come on Bloo  Goblinmonger   Jul-13-08 10:17 PM   #18 
        - As if "the point of the cartoon" were the only thing that mattered...  BlooInBloo   Jul-13-08 10:24 PM   #21 
           - It does matter  Goblinmonger   Jul-13-08 10:29 PM   #25 
              - I used the words I did correctly.  BlooInBloo   Jul-13-08 10:30 PM   #27 
                 - So do you think the intent was not satirical? n/t  Goblinmonger   Jul-13-08 10:32 PM   #31 
                    - We're not communicating....  BlooInBloo   Jul-13-08 10:36 PM   #36 
  - Neither, but it's clearly satirical.  ocelot   Jul-13-08 09:40 PM   #2 
  - It's satirical. But, it's another campaign distraction which he doesn't need right now.  mucifer   Jul-13-08 09:44 PM   #5 
  - It's an accurate depiction of the picture being painted by the insane.  BuyingThyme   Jul-13-08 09:44 PM   #4 
  - It's the New Yorker......  Bennyboy   Jul-13-08 09:44 PM   #7 
  - It doesn't matter how I think about it...  HereSince1628   Jul-13-08 09:45 PM   #8 
  - Exactly! And the crash of the banking industry will never be as important in the media  mucifer   Jul-13-08 09:49 PM   #10 
  - To me, just a sign of continued breakdown of meaningful discourse, and a miscalculation  NRaleighLiberal   Jul-13-08 09:49 PM   #11 
  - It ridicules the Obamas instead of the iditos who believe those portrayals  eleny   Jul-13-08 09:50 PM   #12 
  - Nope  MonkeyFunk   Jul-13-08 10:02 PM   #15 
     - But that's not how it will be used  eleny   Jul-13-08 10:16 PM   #17 
     - It's not clear at all  KingFlorez   Jul-13-08 10:19 PM   #19 
        - It doesn't have to say "satire"  MonkeyFunk   Jul-13-08 10:25 PM   #22 
           - Do you think the average American will read it as satire? Honestly.  Katzenkavalier   Jul-13-08 10:28 PM   #24 
           - sigh  MonkeyFunk   Jul-13-08 10:29 PM   #26 
              - They will see it. Bill O'Reilly and the other hacks will show it to them.  Katzenkavalier   Jul-13-08 10:31 PM   #29 
                 - Maybe  MonkeyFunk   Jul-13-08 10:32 PM   #30 
                    - They'll spin it so bad you can't even imagine... that's what they are there for.  Katzenkavalier   Jul-13-08 10:34 PM   #32 
           - You completely missed my point  KingFlorez   Jul-13-08 10:30 PM   #28 
           - So you think the New Yorker  Goblinmonger   Jul-13-08 10:34 PM   #33 
           - It doesn't matter what the New Yorker thinks. What matters is what  Katzenkavalier   Jul-13-08 10:37 PM   #37 
           - But the shitheads already believe that stuff.  Goblinmonger   Jul-13-08 10:42 PM   #38 
           - The magazine's intent isn't what I was questioning  KingFlorez   Jul-13-08 10:42 PM   #39 
           - sorry  MonkeyFunk   Jul-14-08 12:59 AM   #46 
           - Do you think Average Joe American understands that?  AZBlue   Jul-13-08 10:35 PM   #35 
              - The average Joe American doesn't read the New Yorker  MonkeyFunk   Jul-14-08 01:00 AM   #47 
  - Kick.  Katzenkavalier   Jul-13-08 09:59 PM   #13 
  - I don't think "the average American"  jkshaw   Jul-13-08 10:23 PM   #20 
  - I agree 100%!  Katzenkavalier   Jul-13-08 10:26 PM   #23 
  - No vote until  madamesilverspurs   Jul-13-08 10:35 PM   #34 
  - If I were a subscriber, I'd cancel  minnesota_liberal   Jul-13-08 10:44 PM   #40 
  - I think it would have been more effective INSIDE with the ARTICLE for those of us who READ.  IanDB1   Jul-13-08 11:11 PM   #41 
  - Fodder For MSM - At Least Entire Week  otohara   Jul-13-08 11:12 PM   #42 
  - None of the above (OTHER)  prodn2000   Jul-13-08 11:14 PM   #43 
  - If they do a cartoon on the next issue lampooning John & Cindy McCain it will feel fairer.  bob_weaver   Jul-13-08 11:15 PM   #44 
  - I look at it more like Freedom of the Press...  rasputin1952   Jul-13-08 11:20 PM   #45 
  - Neither: it's a satirical magazine cover - the New Yorker isn't a house organ for the Obama campaign  ruggerson   Jul-14-08 01:03 AM   #48 
  - It's funny  Blue_In_AK   Jul-14-08 01:28 AM   #49 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC