woolldog
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jun-27-08 07:16 PM
Response to Reply #28 |
| 30. They are not comparable. |
| -Earl Warren Part II - Hillary Clinton On The Supreme Court |
Median Democrat |
Jun-27-08 06:19 PM |
#0 |
-
What are her qualifications for the job of SCOTUS? |
blogslut |
Jun-27-08 06:20 PM |
#1 |
 -
What are Fat Tony, Thomas, Scalito and Roberts? |
sasquatch |
Jun-27-08 06:22 PM |
#3 |
  -
They were judges for one thing |
blogslut |
Jun-27-08 06:27 PM |
#8 |
 -
What William Howard Taft? |
Median Democrat |
Jun-27-08 06:36 PM |
#14 |
 -
Taft was a judge |
blogslut |
Jun-27-08 06:39 PM |
#16 |
 -
Please . . . |
Median Democrat |
Jun-27-08 06:42 PM |
#18 |
  -
I'm saying there is a marked difference between being a lawyer |
blogslut |
Jun-27-08 06:44 PM |
#20 |
 -
They don't even have to be lawyers, never mind judges |
WesDem |
Jun-27-08 06:50 PM |
#23 |
 -
Please . . . |
Median Democrat |
Jun-27-08 06:42 PM |
#19 |
 -
You're right, he was. Some justices who weren't judges |
bornskeptic |
Jun-27-08 07:33 PM |
#31 |
 -
She knows more than Clarence Thomas. |
Octafish |
Jun-27-08 06:27 PM |
#7 |
-
I think the two people I know are more qualified |
blogslut |
Jun-27-08 06:29 PM |
#10 |
-
Agree wholeheartedly -- Judge Robinson is most qualified. |
Octafish |
Jun-28-08 09:00 AM |
#38 |
-
Why, thank you for recognizing that |
blogslut |
Jun-28-08 11:29 AM |
#39 |
-
What a waste of her brilliance, remarkable abilites and |
JoFerret |
Jun-27-08 06:21 PM |
#2 |
 -
Yes, but what about her qualifications for the job of SCOTUS? |
blogslut |
Jun-27-08 06:23 PM |
#4 |
-
I don't think it is a job she is particularly suited to or qualified for. |
JoFerret |
Jun-27-08 06:28 PM |
#9 |
 -
Who Would Not Want A SCOTUS Appointment? |
Median Democrat |
Jun-27-08 06:35 PM |
#13 |
-
If that's what she would like then |
JoFerret |
Jun-27-08 08:14 PM |
#33 |
-
HRS Is More Qualified Than Sandra Day O'Connor |
Median Democrat |
Jun-27-08 06:32 PM |
#11 |
 -
O'Connor was a judge before she became a SCOTUS |
blogslut |
Jun-27-08 06:37 PM |
#15 |
-
And explain why that renders Hillary unqualified? |
Median Democrat |
Jun-27-08 06:46 PM |
#21 |
-
Being a judge is not a token position |
blogslut |
Jun-27-08 06:53 PM |
#24 |
 -
We need a judge ready to judge on day 1. |
woolldog |
Jun-27-08 07:03 PM |
#26 |
 -
That's quite a bio she has.. but at 82 that's a serious detriment, indeed. |
ReadTomPaine |
Jun-27-08 10:15 PM |
#36 |
-
O'Connor was much more qualified than Clinton. |
woolldog |
Jun-27-08 07:02 PM |
#25 |
-
Much More Qualified? O'Conor and HRC Are Comparable |
Median Democrat |
Jun-27-08 07:07 PM |
#28 |
-
They are not comparable. |
woolldog |
Jun-27-08 07:16 PM |
#30 |
-
Explain, I Offered Analysis And Facts |
Median Democrat |
Jun-28-08 12:07 AM |
#37 |
-
You didn't offer any analysis. |
woolldog |
Jun-28-08 12:04 PM |
#40 |
-
Ah, so there is an incorrect assumption in your analysis... |
Median Democrat |
Jun-28-08 07:02 PM |
#42 |
-
Bush said the same thing when he nominated Harriet Myers. |
woolldog |
Jun-29-08 12:24 PM |
#43 |
-
What are the qualifications for the SC required by the |
Thothmes |
Jun-27-08 07:13 PM |
#29 |
-
Last Word - If There's A Deal, Neither Obama Nor HRC Will Mention It |
Median Democrat |
Jun-27-08 07:36 PM |
#32 |
-
Appointment by the President |
Jake3463 |
Jun-27-08 08:34 PM |
#35 |
-
Some one that understands the Constitution. |
Thothmes |
Jun-28-08 06:10 PM |
#41 |
-
I can see Hillary on the Court. She almost certainly won't be VP. |
Hieronymus |
Jun-27-08 06:24 PM |
#5 |
-
We better win a lot of seats in the Senate. |
MGKrebs |
Jun-27-08 06:24 PM |
#6 |
-
I'd rather see John Edwards. n/t |
ReadTomPaine |
Jun-27-08 06:34 PM |
#12 |
 -
Edwards - Great Trial Lawyer, But Super Smart? |
Median Democrat |
Jun-27-08 06:40 PM |
#17 |
-
He's one of the sharpest people in politics and his command of the facts is legendary.. |
ReadTomPaine |
Jun-27-08 06:49 PM |
#22 |
-
TOO OLD |
Hippo_Tron |
Jun-27-08 07:04 PM |
#27 |
-
She's too old |
Jake3463 |
Jun-27-08 08:30 PM |
#34 |