You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #22: That breaks no DU rules, even being said off-site, thanks. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
Skip Intro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-21-08 02:57 AM
Response to Reply #14
22. That breaks no DU rules, even being said off-site, thanks.
Now we have changed the subject completely away from the topic of the thread, eh?

Missing accomplished?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Obama: "And so there is no doubt that Iran poses an extraordinary threat to Israel" Skip Intro  Jun-21-08 02:31 AM   #0 
  - ***Sigh***  Tatiana   Jun-21-08 02:33 AM   #1 
  - That's not what he is saying.......your "lets attack Iran?" is you instigating.....  FrenchieCat   Jun-21-08 02:35 AM   #2 
  - whaaaa? I quoted a Reuters report. Argue with them, ok?  Skip Intro   Jun-21-08 02:39 AM   #3 
  - Go spread you anti-Obama garbage somewhere else. I want the Democrats to win  still_one   Jun-21-08 02:41 AM   #6 
  - "Let's attack Iran?"--Who's words are these. Who is posting this question?  FrenchieCat   Jun-21-08 02:42 AM   #7 
  - .  Skip Intro   Jun-21-08 02:44 AM   #9 
     - I know you are......  FrenchieCat   Jun-21-08 02:52 AM   #18 
  - are you suggesting that Sen. Clinton has a less confrontational position regarding Iran?  Douglas Carpenter   Jun-21-08 02:55 AM   #19 
  - Obama is like GW?  fujiyama   Jun-21-08 03:18 AM   #41 
  - Oh gee, Skippy  Cheap_Trick   Jun-21-08 04:48 AM   #110 
  - This is pure flame-bait by someone who dispises Obama. He NEVER called for bombing Iran  still_one   Jun-21-08 02:44 AM   #10 
  - Gee, what are you trying to push? Did you hear his speech before AIPAC?  still_one   Jun-21-08 02:39 AM   #4 
  - At least he's not calling for Iran to be 'obliterated'  hokies4ever   Jun-21-08 02:40 AM   #5 
  - At capitalhillforum.com you say you're voting not voting for Obama anyway.  last1standing   Jun-21-08 02:43 AM   #8 
  - So what?  Skip Intro   Jun-21-08 02:45 AM   #11 
  - This is Democraticunderground.com. We vote for Democrats here.  last1standing   Jun-21-08 02:46 AM   #12 
  - Excuse me, but..  Skip Intro   Jun-21-08 02:55 AM   #20 
     - The rules state very clearly that we're here to support Democrats.  last1standing   Jun-21-08 02:58 AM   #23 
     - That is not factual. As tweety said to the rw radio jock, you don't know wtf you're talking about.  Skip Intro   Jun-21-08 03:04 AM   #28 
        - I guess reading the actual rules of DU were a little too strenuous for you.  last1standing   Jun-21-08 03:10 AM   #32 
           - HERE:  Skip Intro   Jun-21-08 03:29 AM   #49 
              - Yet your posts are extremely disruptive as can be seen here.  last1standing   Jun-21-08 03:33 AM   #55 
                 - how disruptive?  Skip Intro   Jun-21-08 03:36 AM   #59 
                    - Sorry, but you said the article indicated Obama wants to bomb Iran. It does nothing of the sort  still_one   Jun-21-08 03:37 AM   #62 
                    - I asked the question.  Skip Intro   Jun-21-08 03:40 AM   #69 
                       - You weren't asking a question, you were flamebaiting and you know it  still_one   Jun-21-08 03:50 AM   #83 
                          - OP is asking a question. Respond in kind--not with flamebait  rodeodance   Jun-21-08 07:50 AM   #114 
                    - So lying about the Democratic nominee's intent isn't disruptive?  last1standing   Jun-21-08 03:38 AM   #63 
                    - Show me the lie.  Skip Intro   Jun-21-08 03:39 AM   #65 
                       - "Let's attack Iran?"  last1standing   Jun-21-08 03:40 AM   #67 
                          - Comment as a question. How can a question be a lie?  Skip Intro   Jun-21-08 03:40 AM   # 
                             - How pathetic.  last1standing   Jun-21-08 03:41 AM   #73 
                             - Not in kindergarten here? Meanings?  Skip Intro   Jun-21-08 03:44 AM   #76 
                                - Why not tell us that you won't vote for McCain?  last1standing   Jun-21-08 03:46 AM   #79 
                                   - *yawn* off topic and getting really boring  Skip Intro   Jun-21-08 03:47 AM   #80 
                                      - You find Democratic ideals boring?  last1standing   Jun-21-08 03:48 AM   #82 
                                      - No, I find you boring.  Skip Intro   Jun-21-08 03:52 AM   #85 
                                      - And I find your inability to deny your intent to vote repub disgusting.  last1standing   Jun-21-08 03:54 AM   #86 
                             - bullshit, that is the same crap like, "is Obama a Muslim". You know what you are trying to paint  still_one   Jun-21-08 03:45 AM   #77 
                                - Obama is cheerleading Israel as they have wargames to prep for an attack in Iran.  Skip Intro   Jun-21-08 03:52 AM   #84 
                                   - Slanderous, go ahead and sue me. You are a riot. I didn't say YOU called Obama a Muslim  still_one   Jun-21-08 04:06 AM   #101 
                                   - He has said before that he would do whatever is necessary to keep Iran in check. His words, not mine  Skip Intro   Jun-21-08 04:13 AM   #105 
                                      - Nothing in that article states that Obama wants to attack Iran so you lied.  last1standing   Jun-21-08 04:15 AM   #106 
                                   - are you suggesting that Sen. Clinton has a less confrontational position regarding Iran?  Douglas Carpenter   Jun-21-08 04:24 AM   #109 
                    - No...  sendero   Jun-21-08 07:28 AM   #113 
     - No, but you are trying to undermine the current Democratic nominee  still_one   Jun-21-08 03:00 AM   #25 
     - I'm not trying to undermine anything.  Skip Intro   Jun-21-08 03:08 AM   #31 
        - You are self-delusional alright. In the Reuters article Obama NEVER said bomb Iran  still_one   Jun-21-08 03:14 AM   #37 
        - Repukes want to bomb Iran, so how is Obama "as anti-Iran as most repukes?"  Swamp Rat   Jun-21-08 03:16 AM   #40 
     - If you can't say that you'll vote for Obama,  FrenchieCat   Jun-21-08 03:02 AM   #26 
        - You opinion, and I might remind you that it is against the rules to call other DUers freepers.  Skip Intro   Jun-21-08 03:11 AM   #33 
           - She didn't call you a freeper.  last1standing   Jun-21-08 03:16 AM   #39 
              - Guilty?  Skip Intro   Jun-21-08 03:23 AM   #44 
                 - Supporting repubs should make anyone feel guilty.  last1standing   Jun-21-08 03:24 AM   #45 
                    - Where in the fuck did I say I was supporting any repuke? Back up your BS.  Skip Intro   Jun-21-08 03:26 AM   #47 
                       - You have refused to say they you weren't several times now.  last1standing   Jun-21-08 03:31 AM   #51 
                          - Refusing to pledge some bs that you dredged up is not the same as me saying the opposite.  Skip Intro   Jun-21-08 03:32 AM   #53 
                             - And again you refuse and try to change the subject.  last1standing   Jun-21-08 03:34 AM   #56 
                                - I refuse to play your game, yeah.  Skip Intro   Jun-21-08 03:38 AM   #64 
                                   - LOL! Now you allude to Nazism. Anything to change the subject, huh?  last1standing   Jun-21-08 03:40 AM   #70 
                                      - ROFL!!!!!!!!  Skip Intro   Jun-21-08 03:41 AM   #72 
                                         - And still no answer to whether you support McCain.  last1standing   Jun-21-08 03:42 AM   #75 
                                            - I don't answer to you, pal.  Skip Intro   Jun-21-08 03:45 AM   #78 
                                               - It's beginning to look like you don't even answer to your conscience.  last1standing   Jun-21-08 03:48 AM   #81 
  - If you are not supporting the Democratic nominee, GET LOST!!! /nt  still_one   Jun-21-08 02:48 AM   #16 
  - I'm sure that is the case.  FrenchieCat   Jun-21-08 02:46 AM   #13 
  - I'm just going by his/her own posts.  last1standing   Jun-21-08 02:47 AM   #14 
  - Oh, I believe you . Members of the Capital Hill gang are all of that  FrenchieCat   Jun-21-08 02:49 AM   #17 
  - That breaks no DU rules, even being said off-site, thanks.  Skip Intro   Jun-21-08 02:57 AM   #22 
     - Not supporting Democrats breaks DU rules.  last1standing   Jun-21-08 02:59 AM   #24 
        - Technically no. However, in this case the OP is obviously trying to  still_one   Jun-21-08 03:05 AM   #29 
        - The rules do state that we're here to support Dems.  last1standing   Jun-21-08 03:12 AM   #34 
           - The key point is "Democrats and other progressives." which mean's not necessarily Democrats  still_one   Jun-21-08 03:22 AM   #42 
              - "support Democratic candidates for political office"  last1standing   Jun-21-08 03:25 AM   #46 
                 - Progressives are included also. However, in my view the OP is doing pure flamebait  still_one   Jun-21-08 03:29 AM   #50 
                    - The O/P is pure lies of course.  last1standing   Jun-21-08 03:32 AM   #54 
                       - I hear you, I just think it might be considered a gray issue, though my bias  still_one   Jun-21-08 03:36 AM   #60 
        - Well, no it doesn't. And you are using quotes from off site to make that failed point anyway.  Skip Intro   Jun-21-08 03:12 AM   #35 
           - Yes it does as I pointed out above.  last1standing   Jun-21-08 03:13 AM   #36 
              - You're wrong. Skinner's response to my question months ago about supportong Obama  Skip Intro   Jun-21-08 03:22 AM   #43 
                 - Maybe you need to reread his post.  last1standing   Jun-21-08 03:29 AM   #48 
                    - Good Lord.  Skip Intro   Jun-21-08 03:31 AM   #52 
                       - I didn't understand the part where you thought you weren't being disruptive.  last1standing   Jun-21-08 03:35 AM   #58 
                          - I quoted the article. What part was a lie?????  Skip Intro   Jun-21-08 03:37 AM   #61 
                             - "Let's attack Iran?"  last1standing   Jun-21-08 03:39 AM   #66 
                             - You beat me to it, bravo!!!  still_one   Jun-21-08 03:41 AM   #74 
                             - When YOU said the article indicated Obama said "Let's attack Iran?" /nt  still_one   Jun-21-08 03:40 AM   #68 
                             - Where does it say Obama wants to attack Iran?  Cali_Democrat   Jun-21-08 03:41 AM   #71 
  - Deleted message  Name removed   Jun-21-08 02:56 AM   #21 
  - If the OP is that person, than the OP has made his or her mind up not to get on the train  still_one   Jun-21-08 02:48 AM   #15 
  - Busted!!  Cali_Democrat   Jun-21-08 03:34 AM   #57 
  - He said Iran is a threat. He never said obliterate Iran  Cali_Democrat   Jun-21-08 03:02 AM   #27 
  - Absolutely, which only demonstrates the bias of the OP or the lack of comprehension /nt  still_one   Jun-21-08 03:07 AM   #30 
  - Ummm...You're a Hillary Supporter for God's sakes  fujiyama   Jun-21-08 03:16 AM   #38 
  - Wow, no one wants to address the substance of the article.  Skip Intro   Jun-21-08 03:55 AM   #87 
     - That's because there is no substance to the article.  last1standing   Jun-21-08 03:56 AM   #88 
     - Reuters published it, not me.  Skip Intro   Jun-21-08 04:00 AM   #92 
        - You just added the lie at the end.  last1standing   Jun-21-08 04:02 AM   #93 
           - So there is substance to the article?  Skip Intro   Jun-21-08 04:04 AM   #96 
              - No there's really no substance. We all knew Obama's policy. You're the one who tried to lie.  last1standing   Jun-21-08 04:05 AM   #99 
     - Now you're scared??? WTF. Were you scared when YOUR candidate  Kahuna   Jun-21-08 07:15 AM   #111 
  - I will ask the mods to lock this thread now. Instead of the message being the topic, the messenger  Skip Intro   Jun-21-08 03:58 AM   #89 
  - Obama never said "Let's attack Iran."  Cali_Democrat   Jun-21-08 03:59 AM   #90 
  - Your reality is pure spin in the attempt to discourage Democratic voters.  last1standing   Jun-21-08 04:03 AM   #95 
     - None so blind  Skip Intro   Jun-21-08 04:04 AM   #98 
        - As those who need to make up bullshit.  last1standing   Jun-21-08 04:05 AM   #100 
  - I'm sorry if you expect anything different from any candidate running for President.  Political Heretic   Jun-21-08 04:00 AM   #91 
  - Then where does the change begin?  Skip Intro   Jun-21-08 04:02 AM   #94 
     - It begins with admitting that Obama didn't advocate attacking Iran. You did.  last1standing   Jun-21-08 04:04 AM   #97 
        - No, he just praised a nation that had wargames in evident prepartation to attack Iran.  Skip Intro   Jun-21-08 04:06 AM   #102 
           - Which they are totally entiled to do. And Iran IS a threat.  Political Heretic   Jun-21-08 04:08 AM   #103 
           - Unless he suggested attacking Iran in that article you lied about his intentions.  last1standing   Jun-21-08 04:09 AM   #104 
           - When you're in a hole....  Cali_Democrat   Jun-21-08 04:19 AM   #107 
           - . are you suggesting that Sen. Clinton has a less confrontational position regarding Iran?  Douglas Carpenter   Jun-21-08 04:21 AM   #108 
  - He gave a diplomatic answer.  tekisui   Jun-21-08 07:19 AM   #112 
  - This divisive thread should be locked and skip intro (who is an undercover rethug) should be banned.  malik flavors   Jun-21-08 07:53 AM   #115 
  - Locking  Skinner   Jun-21-08 07:54 AM   #116 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC