You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #26: I am sorry that that HAD to be banned. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
last1standing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-17-08 12:52 AM
Response to Reply #16
26. I am sorry that that HAD to be banned.
They were definitely disruptive and not helping in any way with the stated goal of DemocraticUnderground.com. They were spreading lies about the presumptive Democratic nominee and refused to stop despite repeated chances to do so. They had to go.

As I'm sure you know, constructive criticism of Democrats is and always was allowed at DU. What they did was something different.

I'm not saying they were trolls, but they let their hatred consume them, as did so many others. Why?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC