You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #98: You might want to read up on that partial recount [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 04:52 PM
Response to Reply #94
98.  You might want to read up on that partial recount
in the ER forum.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -What happened in New Hampshire? helderheid  Jun-09-08 09:23 AM   #0 
  - Dean inexplicably lost in the Diebold counties also.  Skink   Jun-09-08 09:25 AM   #1 
  - No, it was very explicable  MonkeyFunk   Jun-09-08 09:35 AM   #14 
  - No one really expected Dean to win NH. The only way would've been if he won Iowa big  blm   Jun-09-08 11:33 AM   #65 
     - I was knocking on NH doors for Dean the weekends before he lost in NH...  Tesha   Jun-09-08 12:00 PM   #66 
     - Funny how the media can twist perception, even here at DU with those who believe they're immune  blm   Jun-09-08 12:15 PM   # 
     - Dean lead in New Hampshire for months and months before Iowa.  Zynx   Jun-09-08 12:37 PM   #77 
        - Corporate media polls certainly claimed so. Internals were always tighter.  blm   Jun-09-08 12:43 PM   #78 
           - He did almost always have the lead though. Granted it probably wasn't quite 20-30 pts like  Zynx   Jun-09-08 01:47 PM   #84 
  - I would say probably if we have Republicans manning the systems....  LakeSamish706   Jun-09-08 09:26 AM   #2 
  - it makes my stomach hurt.  helderheid   Jun-09-08 09:27 AM   #3 
  - The NH election was fair and accurate - stop accusing Clinton of cheating  Marrah_G   Jun-09-08 09:28 AM   #4 
  - Oh Christ, I never accused Clinton of cheating. I accuse REPUBLICANS of rigging our votes.  helderheid   Jun-09-08 09:31 AM   #7 
     - Look at your post. Anyone would look at that and think...  Marrah_G   Jun-09-08 09:34 AM   #12 
     - Marrah_G I love you too, however stating "when we make accusations that are false and yell "cheat" "  helderheid   Jun-09-08 09:39 AM   #18 
        - But there was a paper trail and it was recounted  Marrah_G   Jun-09-08 09:44 AM   #21 
           - I agree on removing these machines. I am just starting to look through this:  helderheid   Jun-09-08 09:52 AM   #24 
              - Just keep writing your reps.  Marrah_G   Jun-09-08 10:04 AM   #29 
                 - How did BB fuck up?  helderheid   Jun-09-08 10:18 AM   #33 
                    - They went way over the top making cheating accusations  Marrah_G   Jun-09-08 10:32 AM   #38 
                       - I just got this email from Kathy Dopp:  helderheid   Jun-09-08 10:36 AM   #40 
                          - They really are trying to make something out of nothing.  Marrah_G   Jun-09-08 10:40 AM   #41 
                          - I just don't know.  helderheid   Jun-09-08 10:40 AM   #42 
                          - It's tough- after Ohio and FL it is so easy to see it everywhere you look  Marrah_G   Jun-09-08 10:42 AM   #43 
                          - You have no way of knowing what happened. Nobody does.  sfexpat2000   Jun-09-08 10:43 AM   #46 
                          - No recount was denied; Kuch recounted until he decided not to pay for any further recounts.  Tesha   Jun-09-08 12:05 PM   #68 
     - Not in New Hampshire.  Tesha   Jun-09-08 12:04 PM   #67 
  - They Did A Partial Recount At The Bequest Of Dennis Kucinich And Some Other Guy  DemocratSinceBirth   Jun-09-08 09:28 AM   #5 
  - I never saw that. I need to do some googling  helderheid   Jun-09-08 09:32 AM   #9 
  - If the issue of the voting "irregularities" of the Diebold machines  panader0   Jun-09-08 09:29 AM   #6 
  - ALL Dem candidates except Hillary lost votes in the Diebold counties.  TexasObserver   Jun-09-08 09:31 AM   #8 
  - No, it doesn't make you go "hmmmm"...  MonkeyFunk   Jun-09-08 09:37 AM   #16 
     - votes were stolen from other Dems and given to Hillary.  TexasObserver   Jun-09-08 09:39 AM   #17 
     - That's a blatant lie  MonkeyFunk   Jun-09-08 11:04 AM   #56 
     - It's the truth, and you know it;.  TexasObserver   Jun-09-08 12:27 PM   #71 
        - I dont' slam Obama  MonkeyFunk   Jun-09-08 12:31 PM   #73 
           - Yes, the stats do support my statements.  TexasObserver   Jun-09-08 12:35 PM   #75 
              - What math?  MonkeyFunk   Jun-09-08 03:34 PM   #90 
     - 100% Deluded.  OPERATIONMINDCRIME   Jun-09-08 11:11 AM   #58 
        - It's the truth, and you know it;.  TexasObserver   Jun-09-08 12:29 PM   #72 
           - It's not rejecting the nominee  MonkeyFunk   Jun-09-08 12:32 PM   #74 
           - Two days and counting, hater.  TexasObserver   Jun-09-08 12:35 PM   #76 
              - Go find  MonkeyFunk   Jun-09-08 03:36 PM   #91 
           - The Truth Is That It's 100% Delusional.  OPERATIONMINDCRIME   Jun-09-08 12:46 PM   #79 
              - the truth is you can't handle the truth  TexasObserver   Jun-09-08 01:05 PM   #82 
                 - 100% Deluded.  OPERATIONMINDCRIME   Jun-09-08 02:04 PM   #85 
                    - 100% IGNORED  TexasObserver   Jun-09-08 02:19 PM   #86 
                       - Dellllllllluuuuuuuuudeddddd  OPERATIONMINDCRIME   Jun-09-08 02:54 PM   #88 
     - I've tried to explain this, but they won't listen  BlueDogDemocratNH   Jun-09-08 03:58 PM   #95 
  - It was probably the calculated "crying" moment  cbc5g   Jun-09-08 09:33 AM   #10 
  - firing up the Hillary Hate machine again I see  rodeodance   Jun-09-08 09:41 AM   #19 
     - She asked what happened...thats what happened, it wasn't RW diebold machines  cbc5g   Jun-09-08 09:44 AM   #20 
  - Obama was counting on college students and they were on winter  HopeLives   Jun-09-08 09:34 AM   #11 
  - I get it Deval is AA and Obama is AA and they are friends  goclark   Jun-09-08 12:15 PM   #70 
     - It is not the color of their skin  Marrah_G   Jun-09-08 12:51 PM   #80 
     - I'm not hardly making it about Race  goclark   Jun-09-08 04:36 PM   #96 
        - Let me try and explain a little  Marrah_G   Jun-09-08 04:51 PM   #97 
     - No, it was Axelrod running both their campaigns with the same  HopeLives   Jun-09-08 03:44 PM   #93 
  - Oh for god's sake, not this stupid shit again  MonkeyFunk   Jun-09-08 09:34 AM   #13 
  - Errrrr.... in 2004 you didnt find a problem with Ohio?  Marrah_G   Jun-09-08 09:36 AM   #15 
     - There was a recount in 2004 in New Hampshire because of the vast difference  prodn2000   Jun-09-08 10:43 AM   #45 
     - No they tried it in the NH primaries in 2004 between Dean and Kerry  HopeLives   Jun-09-08 10:58 AM   #55 
     - no, I'm talking about New Hampshire democratic primary in 2004  MonkeyFunk   Jun-09-08 11:06 AM   #57 
        - Ohhhhhhhhhhhh okay- I was confused about your post  Marrah_G   Jun-09-08 11:11 AM   #59 
  - We can't know because the ballot chain of custody was not clear.  sfexpat2000   Jun-09-08 09:48 AM   #22 
  - Thanks - I am just now sifting through this:  helderheid   Jun-09-08 09:51 AM   #23 
     - Mark Crispin Miller has an email list for breaking stories that is great.  sfexpat2000   Jun-09-08 09:57 AM   #26 
  - They had a recount which totally backed up the primary vote.  Marie26   Jun-09-08 09:53 AM   #25 
  - You can't have a good recount if the ballot chain of custody  sfexpat2000   Jun-09-08 10:03 AM   #28 
     - Thank you  helderheid   Jun-09-08 10:04 AM   #30 
     - That's shifting goalposts.  Marie26   Jun-09-08 10:11 AM   #32 
        - It's not really shifting the goal posts, it's just a fact. And, Brad aside,  sfexpat2000   Jun-09-08 10:19 AM   #34 
           - Yeah it is  Marie26   Jun-09-08 10:29 AM   #36 
              - For the record, Edwards was "my guy" at the time. I just got this email:  helderheid   Jun-09-08 10:31 AM   #37 
              - Marie26, explain to me how you can have a clean recount  sfexpat2000   Jun-09-08 10:36 AM   #39 
                 - It's a good issue  Marie26   Jun-09-08 10:43 AM   #44 
                    - I don't remember - was Clinton polling ahead there and expected to win?  helderheid   Jun-09-08 10:45 AM   #47 
                    - Obama won by more than the polls expected  Marie26   Jun-09-08 10:49 AM   #50 
                       - For the record, I'm accusing Republicans of messing with our votes, not Clinton  helderheid   Jun-09-08 10:51 AM   #52 
                          - Nope.  Marie26   Jun-09-08 01:19 PM   #83 
                             - You don't have to prove conspiracy.  sfexpat2000   Jun-09-08 02:30 PM   #87 
                    - Kelvin Mace works election reform in NC. He could give you.  sfexpat2000   Jun-09-08 10:47 AM   #48 
                       - Right, they didn't know  Marie26   Jun-09-08 10:51 AM   #53 
                          - Not exactly. The NH activists brought it up BEFORE the recount.  sfexpat2000   Jun-09-08 10:58 AM   #54 
  - A teary moment the day before we voted.  bunnies   Jun-09-08 10:03 AM   #27 
  - Same thing with Florida in '04  dmesg   Jun-09-08 10:05 AM   #31 
  - IT was RIGGED. Some of you think voting in Ohio in 04 and Florida in 00 was legit  wowimthere   Jun-09-08 10:20 AM   #35 
  - No it wasn't  MonkeyFunk   Jun-09-08 03:38 PM   #92 
  - I posted on the topic a while back, after reading these articles from the election reform forum  Emit   Jun-09-08 10:47 AM   #49 
  - Thanks for the links!  helderheid   Jun-09-08 10:49 AM   #51 
     - SKINNER: This is why we need a GOTV Forum at DU  goclark   Jun-09-08 11:13 AM   #60 
     - You do hang in the ER forum, right?  helderheid   Jun-09-08 11:16 AM   #61 
     - Here, goclark.  sfexpat2000   Jun-09-08 11:23 AM   #64 
        - Thanks ~ then it needs to be a Major Forum for this election  goclark   Jun-09-08 12:13 PM   #69 
     - Do you recall having read these articles before, helderheid?  Emit   Jun-09-08 11:19 AM   #62 
        - I don't recall - I need to take time to really read them. Thanks!  helderheid   Jun-09-08 11:21 AM   #63 
  - Consistent with Iowa and Nevada.  ieoeja   Jun-09-08 01:01 PM   #81 
  - Was she running for the popular vote way back then?  Xap   Jun-09-08 03:24 PM   #89 
  - Debunked. Repeatedly.  BlueDogDemocratNH   Jun-09-08 03:55 PM   #94 
     - You might want to read up on that partial recount  sfexpat2000   Jun-09-08 04:52 PM   #98 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC