You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #: But that was the point. She's a lousy campaigner, and we need to win. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
godhatesrepublicans Donating Member (343 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-07-08 12:15 PM
Original message
But that was the point. She's a lousy campaigner, and we need to win.
Now I didn't have a dog in this fight after Edwards did 3rd place. But lets be honest, if she screwed up this, she'd have screwed up against McCain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -She could have won this thing by staying positive like this speech LittleBlue  Jun-07-08 12:09 PM   #0 
  - Think about all of her flubs. Did they ever occur when she had a nicely written speech?  joshcryer   Jun-07-08 12:10 PM   #1 
  - Good point.  chascarrillo   Jun-07-08 12:11 PM   #4 
  - True. But her "we women" they "latte drinkers", mocking hope,  LittleBlue   Jun-07-08 12:12 PM   #5 
  - but you don't always have a script  Carolina   Jun-07-08 12:13 PM   #8 
  - Well, she did very well during the debates where  sfexpat2000   Jun-07-08 12:47 PM   #20 
  - I think, like someone stated,  gateley   Jun-07-08 12:10 PM   #2 
  - Nah, Hillary is that gal who says stupid shit and then goes "oh damnit."  joshcryer   Jun-07-08 12:12 PM   # 
  - GAL?  mzteris   Jun-07-08 12:17 PM   #14 
  - Both Hillary and her supporters have used gal & girl.  sfexpat2000   Jun-07-08 12:45 PM   #18 
     - yeah  marions ghost   Jun-07-08 12:50 PM   #23 
  - She conceded- isn't it time to move onto the GE? Or do you prefer  bluedawg12   Jun-07-08 12:53 PM   #26 
  - Exactly; she should have had more faith in herself, but I suspect  babylonsister   Jun-07-08 12:15 PM   #10 
  - I do hope that's the case. And that she knows that, too. nt  JerseygirlCT   Jun-07-08 12:50 PM   #22 
  - Exactly what I was thinking.  OneAmerica   Jun-07-08 12:11 PM   #3 
  - Agreed.  rucky   Jun-07-08 12:12 PM   #6 
  - "Every moment spent looking back keeps us from moving forward." -HRC  Truth Hurts A Lot   Jun-07-08 12:13 PM   #7 
  - Agreed. I just wanted to point out the conspicuous contrast  LittleBlue   Jun-07-08 12:14 PM   #9 
  - Uh, renouncing racist voters would have killed her even faster.  BlooInBloo   Jun-07-08 12:15 PM   #11 
  - she could have gotten by  marions ghost   Jun-07-08 12:39 PM   #15 
     - Agreed - had her campaign been run in accordance with this speech the whole way....  BlooInBloo   Jun-07-08 12:41 PM   #16 
        - right, me too--  marions ghost   Jun-07-08 01:01 PM   #27 
           - Two words: Senator Byrd....  BlooInBloo   Jun-07-08 01:03 PM   #28 
              - she might have to live to Byrd's age  marions ghost   Jun-07-08 01:22 PM   #31 
  - But that was the point. She's a lousy campaigner, and we need to win.  godhatesrepublicans   Jun-07-08 12:15 PM   # 
  - This is an amazing speech  dmesg   Jun-07-08 12:15 PM   #12 
  - Thinking the same thing. She could have stood up to the GOP on Iraq  jazzjunkysue   Jun-07-08 12:16 PM   #13 
  - I agree, I recoiled whenever Democrats went negative on each other  CreekDog   Jun-07-08 12:44 PM   #17 
  - I agree...  yourguide   Jun-07-08 12:46 PM   #19 
  - I was just saying that as I watched the end of the speech  JerseygirlCT   Jun-07-08 12:49 PM   #21 
  - Well she did or didn't -but it's time to move on to the GE.  bluedawg12   Jun-07-08 12:51 PM   #24 
  - Agreed!  PatGund   Jun-07-08 12:52 PM   #25 
  - That's what turned me off of her initially  Cheap_Trick   Jun-07-08 01:17 PM   #29 
  - Yes. If she had stayed positive, genuine, and forward-looking, this would have been hers.  Occam Bandage   Jun-07-08 01:18 PM   #30 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC