mrreowwr_kittty
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-29-08 02:30 PM
Response to Original message |
| 1. So you're for candidates using bogus petition signatures? nt |
| -You want a rigid adherence to the rules? THIS is what you get. |
zlt234 |
May-29-08 02:28 PM |
#0 |
-
So you're for candidates using bogus petition signatures? nt |
thecatburgler |
May-29-08 02:30 PM |
#1 |
-
Oh boy |
Straight Shooter |
May-29-08 02:30 PM |
#2 |
-
There is no such "principle" about voting in primaries |
Sundoggy |
May-29-08 02:31 PM |
#3 |
 -
Hillary's Base: |
bvar22 |
May-29-08 03:48 PM |
#46 |
-
And your point is |
JoFerret |
May-29-08 05:19 PM |
#51 |
-
Give an example, please: "want to modify voting rights to adhere to the rules" |
FSogol |
May-29-08 02:31 PM |
#4 |
 -
Um, OK. |
zlt234 |
May-29-08 03:15 PM |
#28 |
  -
And Obama is solely responsible for the agreement that every candidate signed, including Clinton? |
Lerkfish |
May-29-08 03:24 PM |
#36 |
  -
Has Obama promoted taking away their rights? Nope. n/t |
FSogol |
May-29-08 03:25 PM |
#38 |
  -
If Obama supporters decided to arbitrarily hold the GE this afternoon, |
bvar22 |
May-29-08 03:50 PM |
#47 |
  -
There is no "right to vote" in primaries |
casus belli |
Jun-01-08 05:22 AM |
#65 |
 -
There's no "right" involved |
nichomachus |
May-29-08 05:02 PM |
#49 |
-
I said in the OP that I knew it wasn't a legal issue. |
zlt234 |
May-29-08 07:10 PM |
#54 |
-
So I can just load up my petitions with bogus signatures |
IWantAnyDem |
May-29-08 02:31 PM |
#5 |
-
LOL |
Bornaginhooligan |
May-29-08 02:31 PM |
#6 |
-
This violates the 4 paragraph rule on DU |
Bluebear |
May-29-08 02:32 PM |
#7 |
-
how many times do we have to recommend this? |
grantcart |
May-29-08 02:32 PM |
#8 |
-
It's over. Obviously one candidate (Obama) knows what he's doing... |
Connie_Corleone |
May-29-08 02:34 PM |
#9 |
-
Hillbot cricket pls meet hillbotzlt234 |
grantcart |
May-29-08 02:34 PM |
#10 |
-
Clinton praised those "who work hard and play by the rules". |
Tierra_y_Libertad |
May-29-08 02:35 PM |
#11 |
-
Duplicate post - already posted earlier, and the answer is still the same |
CakeGrrl |
May-29-08 02:36 PM |
#12 |
-
LOL, I bet it's burning your ass that she was beaten by a rookie |
Jersey Devil |
May-29-08 02:39 PM |
#13 |
-
What this really tells me is that Obama can be as tough as ANYONE else!! |
futureliveshere |
May-29-08 02:40 PM |
#14 |
 -
yeah, Saint Obama is "tough;" hillary's a dirty-trick playing bitch. give it up please. |
VotesForWomen |
Jun-01-08 05:16 AM |
#64 |
-
Do you understand why the primary system is scheduled as it is? |
Abacus |
May-29-08 02:41 PM |
#15 |
 -
Evidence of this can be found... |
casus belli |
Jun-01-08 05:30 AM |
#67 |
-
This raises a few issues |
JackintheGreen |
May-29-08 02:42 PM |
#16 |
 -
Turning in bogus signatures is a sign that a candidate is unethical or a sloppy amateur |
thecatburgler |
May-29-08 03:04 PM |
#21 |
-
So you're agreeing with me? |
JackintheGreen |
May-29-08 03:13 PM |
#26 |
-
Yep! nt |
thecatburgler |
May-29-08 03:14 PM |
#27 |
-
LOL ... "We're not BREAKING the rules, we're just adhering in non-rigid manner" |
DanTex |
May-29-08 02:43 PM |
#17 |
-
Yeah, I'm down with it |
Teaser |
May-29-08 02:50 PM |
#18 |
-
None Of This Is Very New, Sir |
The Magistrate |
May-29-08 02:57 PM |
#19 |
-
EVERYBODY does that. Petition challenges are done all the time in NY . |
Stephanie |
May-29-08 03:00 PM |
#20 |
 -
Damn straight. The Dems got Nader knocked off the ballot here in AZ in 2004. |
thecatburgler |
May-29-08 03:06 PM |
#23 |
-
Here are dozens of stories about petition challenges - it is standard practice |
Stephanie |
May-29-08 04:13 PM |
#48 |
-
How was your conference call today? |
Jake3463 |
May-29-08 03:05 PM |
#22 |
-
Hey.. You Forgot to Link back to your SOURCE... |
K Gardner |
May-29-08 03:07 PM |
#24 |
 -
No. |
zlt234 |
May-29-08 03:17 PM |
#32 |
-
then why bother? |
Lerkfish |
May-29-08 03:27 PM |
#40 |
-
Yeah, because it was Obama--not Harold Ickes, Terry McAuliffe, and Howard Dean... |
Liberal_Stalwart71 |
May-29-08 03:08 PM |
#25 |
-
So you support election fraud? |
Bleachers7 |
May-29-08 03:16 PM |
#29 |
-
They shouldn't have depended on invalid signatures |
Raine |
May-29-08 03:17 PM |
#30 |
-
Not necessarily bad |
GihrenZabi |
May-29-08 03:17 PM |
#31 |
 -
Thank you for saying that - letter vs. spirit of the law |
LisaM |
May-29-08 05:50 PM |
#53 |
-
The details weren't leaked. |
BalancedGoat |
May-29-08 07:26 PM |
#55 |
-
Well, I read this in the NYT piece on Axelrod |
LisaM |
May-29-08 07:40 PM |
#56 |
-
I assumed you were talking about Jack Ryan. |
BalancedGoat |
May-29-08 07:50 PM |
#57 |
-
Funny how it happened twice in a row, eh? |
LisaM |
May-29-08 07:54 PM |
#58 |
-
This act showed a glimpse of the manipulator he would become |
GoesTo11 |
May-29-08 03:17 PM |
#33 |
-
Yeah who needs rules anyways? |
Indenturedebtor |
May-29-08 03:18 PM |
#34 |
 -
Yes, they're very desperate now. They're even citing things that are |
indie_ana_500 |
May-29-08 07:57 PM |
#60 |
-
"respect voting rights"? |
Lerkfish |
May-29-08 03:22 PM |
#35 |
-
GOOD!! Damn that's great news! I like rules! |
SoonerPride |
May-29-08 03:25 PM |
#37 |
-
Big K&R! What's inside the box draped with shiny hope and change paper? |
Skip Intro |
May-29-08 03:25 PM |
#39 |
 -
Thanks for the K&R! Obama won't let his opponents cheat! Yay, Obama! |
scheming daemons |
May-29-08 03:29 PM |
#42 |
-
"It is how Barack Obama destroyed his enemies back in 1996 that conflicts with his message today.... |
Skip Intro |
May-29-08 03:35 PM |
#44 |
-
The irony of a Hillary supporter having an issue with that is staggering |
Chulanowa |
May-29-08 03:40 PM |
#45 |
-
i am SO HAPPY we have a nominee who knows how to enforce the rules! |
unblock |
May-29-08 03:28 PM |
#41 |
-
Get rid of the rules, chaos is much better. |
IsItJustMe |
May-29-08 03:30 PM |
#43 |
-
This story has been out there for a while |
democrattotheend |
May-29-08 05:16 PM |
#50 |
-
The rules committee |
quaker bill |
May-29-08 05:19 PM |
#52 |
-
Actually, you are wrong that Obama supporters want to modify rules re MI/FL. It is Clinton... |
indie_ana_500 |
May-29-08 07:55 PM |
#59 |
-
Call a WAAMBULANCE. |
undeterred |
Jun-01-08 03:53 AM |
#61 |
-
! |
FrenchieCat |
Jun-01-08 03:55 AM |
#62 |
-
O-ists sure love their rules, don't they? |
VotesForWomen |
Jun-01-08 05:14 AM |
#63 |
-
"Knock out your opposition, challenge their petitions..." |
Azathoth |
Jun-01-08 05:24 AM |
#66 |