You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Reply #42: I don't know, who could possibly step in and be the dark horse? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
Aloha Spirit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-25-08 05:24 PM
Response to Reply #41
42. I don't know, who could possibly step in and be the dark horse?
Edited on Sun May-25-08 05:24 PM by beat tk
I don't see Gore doing it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
  -Is there even a remote possibility that Senator Clinton can win* BEFORE August 25th? beat tk  May-25-08 04:15 PM   #0 
  - Yes!  Bad Thoughts   May-25-08 04:17 PM   #1 
  - OH man, I would love to see a constitutional amendment passed in less than three months!  beat tk   May-25-08 04:19 PM   #3 
     - Apparently, anything can happen  Bad Thoughts   May-25-08 05:03 PM   #31 
        - That's what I'm talking about.  beat tk   May-25-08 05:08 PM   #34 
  - her chance of winning on or after August 25th is also 0  Gore1FL   May-25-08 04:18 PM   #2 
  - Maybe "winning" for her means making sure Obama loses...  polichick   May-25-08 04:20 PM   #4 
  - I just wonder if voters in the remaining contests would support her if they thought that her only  beat tk   May-25-08 04:26 PM   #5 
     - As someone who just voted last week,  LWolf   May-25-08 05:21 PM   #41 
        - I don't know, who could possibly step in and be the dark horse?  beat tk   May-25-08 05:24 PM   #42 
           - Gore is the obvious, strongest, choice.  LWolf   May-25-08 05:54 PM   #48 
  - She has a 50% chance of winning the nomination.  NJSecularist   May-25-08 04:27 PM   #6 
  - No she doesn't.  HawkeyeX   May-25-08 04:28 PM   #7 
  - Yes, she does.  NJSecularist   May-25-08 04:29 PM   #9 
     - What do you figure are Senator Clinton's odds if you use the definition of winning that I provided?  beat tk   May-25-08 04:31 PM   #11 
        - She cannot win before the convention.  NJSecularist   May-25-08 04:32 PM   #12 
           - Okay, thanks for clarifying that. Why do you say she can't win before the convention? Just curious.  beat tk   May-25-08 04:33 PM   #13 
           - Because superdelegates can change their minds on the convention floor. n/t  NJSecularist   May-25-08 04:35 PM   #14 
              - So you're saying superdelegates will not change their minds before then?  beat tk   May-25-08 04:36 PM   #16 
                 - It's a more organized format for the SDs to change their minds at the convention.  NJSecularist   May-25-08 04:38 PM   #17 
                    - I see. Thanks! I agree that if the SDs switch en masse, it will most likely be at the Convention.  beat tk   May-25-08 04:41 PM   #20 
           - But she can LOSE before the convention. We all know she can, because she did.  dicksteele   May-25-08 04:50 PM   #23 
  - How do you figure?  beat tk   May-25-08 04:28 PM   #8 
  - That poster thinks they're being reasonable, by allowing that anyone BESIDES Queen Inevitable  impeachdubya   May-25-08 06:05 PM   #51 
  - yes  swampg8r   May-25-08 04:29 PM   #10 
  - haha yes, I guess it is 50%.  beat tk   May-25-08 04:45 PM   #21 
  - She's already LOST the nomination. It's a fact. Get over it already.  dicksteele   May-25-08 04:48 PM   #22 
  - only if they decide it by coin toss  quaker bill   May-25-08 05:05 PM   #33 
  - You could say there are three possible outcomes.  beat tk   May-25-08 05:10 PM   #35 
  - If this were a truly even race I'd actually be all in favor of that  Hippo_Tron   May-25-08 05:50 PM   #47 
     - It is the only way she gets to 50:50  quaker bill   May-25-08 06:03 PM   #49 
  - Hey, look! That leprechaun is fucking that Unicorn!  impeachdubya   May-25-08 06:04 PM   #50 
  - No  Duder   May-25-08 04:35 PM   #15 
  - There are 40 SDs up for grabs. Obama needs 10. Clinton needs 200.  baldguy   May-25-08 04:39 PM   #18 
  - Before or after even if Obama implodes.  Radical Activist   May-25-08 04:39 PM   #19 
  - I agree  Swamp Rat   May-25-08 04:57 PM   #29 
  - No.  ButterflyBlood   May-25-08 04:52 PM   #24 
  - Yo, Beat:  dicksteele   May-25-08 04:53 PM   #25 
  - Oh no!  beat tk   May-25-08 04:55 PM   #26 
     - Thank you-cThat's EXACTLY why I chose that pic to label for this purpose!  dicksteele   May-25-08 05:40 PM   #43 
  - Other:  LWolf   May-25-08 04:56 PM   #27 
  - Well, what if you use the definition of winning that I included in the poll? Just curious.  beat tk   May-25-08 04:57 PM   #30 
     - I disagree with that definition of "winning."  LWolf   May-25-08 05:16 PM   #38 
        - I agree, it's not fair that the field was narrowed so quickly. You just made me think of something!  beat tk   May-25-08 05:20 PM   #40 
           - Some things that would help:  LWolf   May-25-08 05:47 PM   #46 
  - I am glad that the "other" option was not for naught.  beat tk   May-25-08 04:57 PM   #28 
  - Greater than zero  quaker bill   May-25-08 05:04 PM   #32 
  - 0.0001%... you may be right.  beat tk   May-25-08 05:12 PM   #37 
  - NO  FrenchieCat   May-25-08 05:11 PM   #36 
  - If voters knew that Hillary can't win* except at Denver, do you think they'd still vote for her?  beat tk   May-25-08 05:16 PM   #39 
  - August 2016 n/t  intaglio   May-25-08 05:44 PM   #44 
  - Please add "Fuck no because she is a heartless sack of dog excrement." n/t  greguganus   May-25-08 05:46 PM   #45 
     - Stop insulting dog excrement like that!  baldguy   May-25-08 06:57 PM   #52 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC