You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #34: Tied for 3rd with Richardson [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-25-08 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
34. Tied for 3rd with Richardson
1. Kucinich 2. Biden
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -When The Race First Started, Where Did Obama Rank On Your List Of Preferred Candidates? Magic Rat  May-25-08 01:36 PM   #0 
  - No 1. He's a clear progressive voice with a progressive record and  Radical Activist   May-25-08 01:37 PM   #1 
  - I was an Edwards guy, but it was basically a 3-way tie for me....  BlooInBloo   May-25-08 01:37 PM   #2 
  - hard to say really, probably 2-3  renegade000   May-25-08 01:37 PM   #3 
  - No. 2, not including Gore.  tridim   May-25-08 01:39 PM   #4 
  - none of my first choices ever make it  Gore1FL   May-25-08 01:39 PM   #5 
  - For me it was: Edwards, Biden then Obama  Va Lefty   May-25-08 01:40 PM   #6 
  - I went Gore-Kucinich-Edwards-Obama. nt.  Phoebe Loosinhouse   May-25-08 01:40 PM   #7 
  - Me too! BUT, I voted #2 because he was my 2nd "logical" choice.  johnaries   May-25-08 02:43 PM   #40 
  - My choices were  nichomachus   May-25-08 01:41 PM   #8 
  - I snuck the Kool-Aid into your milk while you were sleeping  hokies4ever   May-25-08 02:24 PM   #22 
  - Didn't you notice that IV tube in your arm when you woke up?  rebel with a cause   May-25-08 02:52 PM   #43 
  - As soon as he was elected to the Senate...  RichardRay   May-25-08 01:41 PM   #9 
  - The convention speech was before his election...  lisa58   May-25-08 01:45 PM   #14 
     - Yep. I was a little short on words there  RichardRay   May-25-08 01:55 PM   #20 
  - I wanted someone to break out of the second tier...  lisa58   May-25-08 01:42 PM   #10 
  - Actually first I was totally for Obama, then I heard Biden....  48percenter   May-25-08 01:43 PM   #11 
  - Edwards was my first choice , but Obama was a very close second..  Tippy   May-25-08 01:44 PM   #12 
  - I really thought Edwards would take it this year  Yael   May-25-08 01:44 PM   #13 
  - Richardson, Edwards, Obama  slackmaster   May-25-08 01:45 PM   #15 
  - In terms of being most progressive AND most capabable of beating the Rethugs  rocknation   May-25-08 01:45 PM   #16 
  - I supported Edwards. I thought Obama would crash and burn in Iowa.  orangepeel68   May-25-08 01:50 PM   #17 
  - Couldn't back anybody that voted for the IWR so went to Obama early  featherman   May-25-08 01:51 PM   #18 
  - He was tied for last place with Hillary Clinton.  LWolf   May-25-08 01:51 PM   #19 
  - still in 8th?  Magic Rat   May-25-08 02:20 PM   #21 
     - I'll alert the media  hokies4ever   May-25-08 02:25 PM   #24 
     - Still tied for 8th.  LWolf   May-25-08 02:53 PM   #44 
  - I picked #5 because he an Clinton were tied after the the more liberal candidates.  sfexpat2000   May-25-08 02:24 PM   #23 
  - Clark first, then Obama. /nt  kevsand   May-25-08 02:26 PM   #25 
  - Here's my order...  aaaaaa5a   May-25-08 02:27 PM   #26 
  - Third...behind Dennis Kucinich and John Edwards.  Fox Mulder   May-25-08 02:27 PM   #27 
  - Obama was #1 of that group  WesDem   May-25-08 02:28 PM   #28 
  - If you leave out Al Gore, he was #2 or #3. I went Gore-Kucinich-Dodd-Obama.  impeachdubya   May-25-08 02:28 PM   #29 
  - I was Kucinich, Edwards, Obama. nt  billyoc   May-25-08 02:30 PM   #30 
  - Mine went Kucinich, Edwards, Biden, Obama.  FlyingSquirrel   May-25-08 02:33 PM   #31 
  - I really didn't exactly have a list  union_maid   May-25-08 02:34 PM   #32 
  - Second to Gore.  AtomicKitten   May-25-08 02:35 PM   #33 
  - Tied for 3rd with Richardson  rucky   May-25-08 02:36 PM   #34 
  - Obama was #1 from when he announced  4_Legs_Good   May-25-08 02:38 PM   #35 
  - Kucinich, Edwards, then Obama  dethl   May-25-08 02:38 PM   #36 
  - He wasn't even anywhere on my list  DeschutesRiver   May-25-08 02:40 PM   #37 
  - He was 3rd behind Dodd and then Biden. eom  chieftain   May-25-08 02:41 PM   #38 
  - Gore was my first choice for this campaign  newmajority   May-25-08 02:42 PM   #39 
  - No.3 or 4  nxylas   May-25-08 02:46 PM   #41 
  - My first was edwards  gabeana   May-25-08 02:47 PM   #42 
  - 3rd.  Bright Eyes   May-25-08 02:54 PM   #45 
  - I almost forgot Kucinich (because I never considered him viable)  hfojvt   May-25-08 02:57 PM   #46 
  - he was the *least qualified* out of the entire field. people are going to wonder WTF is up with the  VotesForWomen   May-25-08 03:06 PM   #47 
  - Has it ever occurred to you that electing party insiders is why our party has been stagnant?  Liberal Veteran   May-25-08 03:11 PM   #51 
  - Other: Edwards was 1, Obama and Clinton tied for 2.  Liberal Veteran   May-25-08 03:08 PM   # 
  - He wouldn't have ranked.  MrsGrumpy   May-25-08 03:08 PM   #48 
  - Clark or Gore, then I was stuck between Edwards and Obama...  tokenlib   May-25-08 03:09 PM   #49 
  - Obama/Richardson has been my dream ticket since Dec. '06,  Johnny__Motown   May-25-08 03:10 PM   #50 
  - I'll be honest. I supported Edwards for "electibility" reasons.  cottonseed   May-25-08 03:11 PM   #52 
  - Gore wasn't running so I took a few of those internet quizzes that show where  TBF   May-25-08 03:12 PM   #53 
  - Honestly, second to last. I wanted Kucinich, then Edwards. After that, got to know Obama  WA98296   May-25-08 03:13 PM   #54 
  - Kucinich, Gravel, Dodd, Obama..the others didn't pass the nose test.  Tierra_y_Libertad   May-25-08 03:14 PM   #55 
  - 7th  Forkboy   May-25-08 03:15 PM   #56 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC