You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #56: Assassination is totally irrelevant to her point. So why keep [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
DevonRex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 08:59 AM
Response to Reply #41
56. Assassination is totally irrelevant to her point. So why keep
keep on saying it? She can easily reference Bobby Kennedy still campaigning in June without talking about him being assassinated.

OR, if she wanted to avoid the subject altogether, she could have used any number of examples.

And no, that argument is not lame. If her point is June that's all she had to say. If her point is assassination, that's what she has to say.

Pretty simple.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC