You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #20: Yet part of your argument is based on 'being adequately informed', belied by the hypothetical: [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #11
20. Yet part of your argument is based on 'being adequately informed', belied by the hypothetical:
"Imagine this headline: President Bush enacts law in emergency crisis that henceforth no more campaigning is allowed and all information to voters will come through approved television channels."

So, what does "campaigning is prohibited" mean, if it is allowed "through approved television channels" in the hypothetical? Doesn't this scenario insinuate a loss of information access?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC