ruggerson
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed May-21-08 09:30 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
| -Obama should not appoint any Repug to ANYTHING who is anti choice or anti GLBT rights |
ruggerson |
May-21-08 09:25 PM |
#0 |
 -
Amen. |
SemiCharmedQuark |
May-21-08 09:26 PM |
#1 |
| -
If they arent appointed to a position where that impacts their decisions |
DJ13 |
May-21-08 09:28 PM |
#2 |
 -
Which positions aren't impacted by civil and human rights? |
ruggerson |
May-21-08 09:29 PM |
#6 |
 -
Exactly. I see nothing wrong with Hagel head of the Department of Defense. |
GarbagemanLB |
May-21-08 09:29 PM |
#7 |
| -
A lot of gay and lesbian servicemembers would disagree with you |
ruggerson |
May-21-08 09:32 PM |
#12 |
| -
Er, Sam Nunn is a Democrat. |
chascarrillo |
May-21-08 09:28 PM |
#3 |
| -
In name only |
ruggerson |
May-21-08 09:30 PM |
#8 |
| -
No fan of Nunn, but he is a Democrat. |
Warren Stupidity |
May-21-08 09:29 PM |
#4 |
| -
More of a Dixiecrat, actually. |
QC |
May-21-08 10:33 PM |
#31 |
| -
Sam Nunn's actions on gays in the military were disgraceful |
Hippo_Tron |
May-22-08 01:34 AM |
#81 |
| -
What's more telling is you thinking that would be a consideration. |
AtomicKitten |
May-21-08 09:29 PM |
#5 |
| -
You don't think human rights should be a consideration? |
ruggerson |
May-21-08 09:31 PM |
#10 |
| -
Nice swerve; very Clintonian of you. |
AtomicKitten |
May-21-08 09:35 PM |
#17 |
| -
I guess you don't read that it's being bandied around in the press and here on DU |
ruggerson |
May-21-08 09:39 PM |
#18 |
| -
You do realize when you post people can read it across the internets? |
AtomicKitten |
May-21-08 09:48 PM |
#22 |
| -
I was |
ruggerson |
May-21-08 10:30 PM |
#30 |
| -
You have supported both Clintons knowing full well they threw the LGBT community under the bus. |
AtomicKitten |
May-21-08 11:13 PM |
#37 |
| -
You see the world as |
ruggerson |
May-21-08 11:41 PM |
#41 |
| -
No, ruggerson, we are dealing with a failed candidate, your candidate, that is |
AtomicKitten |
May-21-08 11:49 PM |
#44 |
| -
What does that have to do with me suggesting that Barack shouldn't |
ruggerson |
May-22-08 12:02 AM |
#48 |
| -
The point is that this is a back-door clinton ad. |
dailykoff |
May-22-08 12:05 AM |
#50 |
| -
Listen |
ruggerson |
May-22-08 12:06 AM |
#52 |
| -
Listen rudolph, I'm not playing with you. |
dailykoff |
May-22-08 12:07 AM |
#55 |
| -
then don't |
ruggerson |
May-22-08 12:09 AM |
#58 |
| -
I was agreeing with AC. |
dailykoff |
May-22-08 12:10 AM |
#60 |
| -
AK, not AC |
ruggerson |
May-22-08 12:14 AM |
#62 |
| -
get back to us when she concedes ....... |
AtomicKitten |
May-22-08 12:07 AM |
#54 |
| -
Get back to me |
ruggerson |
May-22-08 12:10 AM |
#59 |
| -
That "anger" which is shared by many will subside when she concedes. |
AtomicKitten |
May-22-08 12:17 AM |
#63 |
| -
You seem to be in denial over the fact |
ruggerson |
May-22-08 12:23 AM |
#65 |
| -
No, Hillary is in denial that Barack has won. |
AtomicKitten |
May-22-08 12:28 AM |
#68 |
| -
You seem to be confusing |
ruggerson |
May-22-08 12:30 AM |
#70 |
| -
Yep, the reindeer games are getting old. |
dailykoff |
May-22-08 12:04 AM |
#49 |
| -
Still |
ruggerson |
May-22-08 12:05 AM |
#51 |
| -
Oh is that what it said? |
dailykoff |
May-22-08 12:07 AM |
#53 |
| -
your op's were locked |
ruggerson |
May-22-08 12:08 AM |
#56 |
| -
Wrong again, yawn. |
dailykoff |
May-22-08 12:09 AM |
#57 |
| -
we agree on that |
ruggerson |
May-22-08 12:10 AM |
#61 |
| -
I second that. |
papapi |
May-21-08 10:05 PM |
#24 |
| -
You could have stopped after the word Repug and I'd still agree. |
Forkboy |
May-21-08 09:31 PM |
#9 |
| -
Agreed. And we also have to work on Obama to come around to full-blown marriage rights. |
BlooInBloo |
May-21-08 09:32 PM |
#11 |
| -
Chuck Hagel would be great in some position in an Obama administration. |
mmonk |
May-21-08 09:32 PM |
#13 |
| -
Justice, Defense and State |
ruggerson |
May-21-08 09:39 PM |
#19 |
| -
Chuck Hagel has a 100% apprioval rating from the fucking (un)Christian Coalition |
newmajority |
May-21-08 09:42 PM |
#20 |
| -
You can take that newmajority of yours and .... |
thewiseguy |
May-21-08 11:53 PM |
#46 |
| -
Do you want Pat Robertson in Obama's cabinet?? |
newmajority |
May-22-08 12:19 AM |
#64 |
| -
I guess that eliminates Clinton too |
berni_mccoy |
May-21-08 09:33 PM |
#14 |
| -
rofl |
dailykoff |
May-21-08 10:12 PM |
#26 |
| -
It's Barack's choice. |
Lucky 13 |
May-21-08 09:34 PM |
#15 |
| -
I agree -- no Republican as veep. That would just be inane |
TheDoorbellRang |
May-21-08 09:34 PM |
#16 |
| -
I agree. |
FLDem5 |
May-21-08 09:43 PM |
#21 |
| -
Nunn makes everything suspicious. |
OHdem10 |
May-21-08 09:57 PM |
#23 |
| -
At least 35% of the Democratic Party core constituency is GLBT or their supporters... |
papapi |
May-21-08 10:11 PM |
#25 |
| -
I trust Obama won't be picking any geezers who aren't au courant |
Mimosa |
May-21-08 10:14 PM |
#27 |
| -
I favor appolinting Repubs to posts where their ideological defects will have no effect when the |
Stop Cornyn |
May-21-08 10:16 PM |
#28 |
| -
that leaves |
ruggerson |
May-21-08 11:03 PM |
#33 |
| -
I could see a pro-environment Repub as secretary of the interior. Even if he or she was anti-choice, |
Stop Cornyn |
May-21-08 11:42 PM |
#42 |
| -
he taught constitution law and was a civil right attorney so why worry? |
Lord Helmet |
May-21-08 10:21 PM |
#29 |
| -
No Republicans PERIOD. PERIOD. What are we, chumps?! |
WinkyDink |
May-21-08 10:40 PM |
#32 |
| -
i agree that obama should NOT put Hagel on his ticket. |
Elrond Hubbard |
May-21-08 11:07 PM |
#34 |
| -
I'm not motivated by either of those two people but you can't expect he is going to pick a VP that |
kwenu |
May-21-08 11:08 PM |
#35 |
| -
Agreed. |
Starbucks Anarchist |
May-21-08 11:11 PM |
#36 |
| -
I don't think anyone here supports Hagel as a VP choice. |
thecatburgler |
May-21-08 11:16 PM |
#38 |
| -
why not...it could be seen as a home run by a large portion of his base. nt. |
IndianaJones |
May-21-08 11:19 PM |
#39 |
| -
Should he appoint any pro life Democrats to his cabinet? |
totodeinhere |
May-21-08 11:36 PM |
#40 |
| -
Why would he wish to? |
ruggerson |
May-21-08 11:45 PM |
#43 |
| -
He might wish to in order to be inclusive of all Democrats. |
totodeinhere |
May-22-08 01:29 AM |
#79 |
| -
Let's say, theoretically, that he appointed Bob Casey to a cabinet position |
newmajority |
May-22-08 12:34 AM |
#72 |
| -
I'd rather see Clinton as VP than Hagel. |
billyoc |
May-21-08 11:50 PM |
#45 |
| -
No republican for VP but he needs a strong national security with a good name recognition as VP |
thewiseguy |
May-21-08 11:56 PM |
#47 |
| -
There are plenty of people with strong national security cred |
ruggerson |
May-22-08 12:27 AM |
#67 |
| -
Okay, then, Russ Feingold or Barbara Boxer. |
impeachdubya |
May-22-08 12:31 AM |
#71 |
| -
I agree. |
ccharles000 |
May-22-08 12:25 AM |
#66 |
| -
I'm an Obama supporter, and I agree that putting someone anti-choice on the ticket is a dealbreaker. |
impeachdubya |
May-22-08 12:29 AM |
#69 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
May-22-08 01:06 AM |
#73 |
| -
Bull Crap |
Milo_Bloom |
May-22-08 01:16 AM |
#74 |
| -
Human rights are a dealbreaker |
ruggerson |
May-22-08 01:19 AM |
#75 |
| -
I don't support Hagel for Veep. |
Milo_Bloom |
May-22-08 01:21 AM |
#76 |
| -
There are plenty of qualified people |
ruggerson |
May-22-08 01:25 AM |
#77 |
| -
Who command the same respect and spirit of bi-partisanship? |
Milo_Bloom |
May-22-08 01:32 AM |
#80 |
| -
Well let's make Pat Robertson sec'y of Education |
ruggerson |
May-22-08 01:35 AM |
#82 |
| -
They aren't qualified for those positions. |
Milo_Bloom |
May-22-08 01:38 AM |
#84 |
| -
there are plenty of good religious people |
ruggerson |
May-22-08 01:41 AM |
#86 |
| -
So? |
Milo_Bloom |
May-22-08 10:58 AM |
#88 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
May-22-08 01:36 AM |
#83 |
| -
Sure it is |
ruggerson |
May-22-08 01:39 AM |
#85 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
May-22-08 09:19 AM |
#87 |
| -
Obama won't pick Sam Nunn or Chuck Hagel |
Hippo_Tron |
May-22-08 01:27 AM |
#78 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread